CH2 - Stakeholders & Social Responsibility Flashcards

1
Q

Agency Relationship Definition

A

(Jensen & Meckling 1976)
Is a contract under which 1 or more persons (‘the principals’) engage another person (the agent) to perform some service on their behalf that involves delegating their decision-making authority to the agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Agency Theory => Use

A

Agency theory is used to study the problems of motivation and control when a principal needs the help of an agent to carry out activities

Agency Theory, according to Berle and Means (The Modern Corporation and Private Property) is:

  • separation of ownership and control
  • division of authority and responsibility
  • agents are accountable towards their principal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Agency Problem

A

Potential conflicts of interest between management (agent) and shareholders (principal)

  • Agent => short-term thinking, principal => long-term
  • Agent => personal wealth of agent which may be detrimental to the principals wealth or long-term goals/strategy
  • Principals may suffer from a lack of visibility of whats going on within the Company. Principal will have to trust the info & that the agent is acting in the principals best interests.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Agency Monitoring Systems

- Principles can take a no. of steps to monitor their agents:

A
  • Increase number of NEDs
  • Request formation of committees
  • Employ consultants
  • Attend AGM & questions board
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Agency Solution

A
  • Shareholders (principals) posses the right to remove directors from office
  • Shareholders can take steps to exercise control (expensive, time-consuming and difficult to manage)
    => any steps taken by shareholders are likely to incur ‘agency costs’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Agency issues

=> why shareholders may become concerned about management:

A
- Deteriorations in:
=> share price
=> profits
=> market reaction
- poor transparency
- economic factors
- loss of staff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ways in which principals can align their interests with agents:

A
Incentives (increase agents personal wealth):
- Bonuses
- Shares
- Share options
=> performance related pay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stakeholder Claims:

A
  • Direct

- Indirect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Classifying stakeholders

A
Classified by proximity to Org:
- Internal
- Connected
- External
Or classified as:
- Active
- Passive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why Orgs need to recognise its stakeholders when making significant strategic decisions

A
  • to identify way of communicating with and managing stakeholders
  • to pre-empt negative reactions and manage stakeholder conflicts
  • to assess level of interest and power
  • to establish support for strategic goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Power and Interest

Mendelow 1991

A

(Mendelow 1991)
=>Low power, low interest = Minimal effort
=>Low power, high interest = Kept informed (community representatives)
=>High power, low interest = Kept satisfied (Institutional Investors)
=>High power, high interest = Acceptable (Key players)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Level of Power:

Mendelow 1991

A
  • Who can exercise the most influence over a particular decision.
  • Those who actively participate in decision making
  • Those who’s views are regularly consulted
  • Those who have right of veto over decisions
  • Can be more influential if their power is combined with:
    => Legitimacy
    => Urgency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Level of Interest:

Mendelow 1991

A

Reflects the effort stakeholders put in to attempting to participate in the org’s activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Problems with stakeholder mapping

Mendelow 1991

A
  • Difficult to measure each stakeholders power & influence
  • Map is not static. Changing circumstances may mean stakeholders change positions
  • Map is based on the idea that strategic positioning, rather than moral or ethical concerns, should govern org’s attitudes to stakeholders
  • If there are a no. of key players and their views conflict, it can be very difficult to resolve the situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fiduciary Duty:

A

Is a duty of care and trust which 1 person or entity owes to another. It can be a legal or ethical obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 fundamentally different motivations for considering stakeholders

A
  • Instrumental view => justifies considering stakeholders purely because of the economic benefits to the company
  • Normative view => based on the idea that the Co. has moral obligations towards its stakeholders
17
Q

Corporate Social Responsibility

A

Is a concept whereby Orgs consider the interest of society by taking responsibility for the impact of their activities on wider stakeholder groups.
This obligation can be seem to extend beyond their statutory obligations to comply with legislation.

18
Q

Carrol 1991 describes and categorises CSR

A

Carrol, 1991 - CSR Categorised:

  • Economic ( Basic Level)
  • Legal
  • Ethical
  • Philanthropic (High Level)
19
Q

Corporate Citizenship

Mattern & Crone, 2005

A

Corporate Citizenship (Mattern & Crone, 2005):

  • Limited view (mostly imposed)
  • Equivalent view (part voluntary, part imposed)
  • Extended view (mostly voluntary)
20
Q

Ethical Stances (Johnson et al 2017)

A

Ethical Stances (Johnson et al 2017):

  • Short-term shareholder interests
  • Long-term shareholder interests
  • Multiple stakeholder obligations
  • Shaper of society
21
Q

CSR viewpoints (Grey et al, 1996)

A

CSR viewpoints (Grey et al, 1996):

  • Pristine capitalist (traditional view)
  • Expedient (cynical view)
  • Social Ecologist (Use natural resources)
  • Socialist (Address imbalance in society)
  • Radical Feminist (Promote feminine values)
  • Deep Ecologist (Promote habit conservation)
22
Q

CSR 2.0 (Visser 2011)

A

CSR 2.0 (Visser 2011):
Suggests that we should be responsible for making the changes ourselves.
5 principles should be adopted in order to do this:
- Creativity (embrace new ideas)
- Scalability (translating them across borders)
- Responsiveness (the ability to change)
- Glocality (local solutions on a global scale)
- Circularity (recognising the cycle of events)

23
Q

Arguments for/against CSR

A
For:
- Reputation
- Attractive 
- Advantage
Against:
- Taking money away from Shareholders
- Time-consuming (lose focus on actual business)
- Public Relations activity only
24
Q

Social and Environmental Reporting

- Reporting guidelines to serve as frameworks:

A
  • IS0 14000 Environmental Management Standard (prescribes a general framework on which a no. of specific standards have been based)
  • Global Report Initiative (GRI) sustainability reporting guidelines (develop: transparency, accountability, reporting and sustainable development)
  • AA1000 Standard on triple-bottom line (3BL) reporting (people, planet, profit)
  • EU EMAS emphasising targets and improvements (voluntary scheme)
25
Q

Integrated Reporting

- What is an integrated report

A

An integrated report is a concise communication about how an Orgs strategy, governance, performance & prospects, in the context of its external environment, lead to the creation of value in the short, medium and long term.

26
Q

Categories of Capital

A
  • Financial
  • Manufactured
  • Human
  • Intellectual
  • Natural
  • Social
27
Q

7 guiding principles that IR requires an org’s reporting to follow:

A
  • Strategic and forward-looking
  • Connectivity across all relationships that create value
  • Stakeholder relationships & how they work to create value
  • Materiality, disclosing those matters that substantially affect value creation
  • Reliability & completeness, avoiding any bias
  • Conciseness (to encourage people to read about IR)
  • Consistent & comparable presentation with other Orgs & over time
28
Q

Social & Environmental Reporting - 4 standards/reports

A
  • AA1000 Standard - Triple bottom line (3BL) reporting
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
  • EU Ecomanagement & Audit Schemes (EU EMAS)
  • ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standard
29
Q

AA1000 Standard - Triple bottom line (3BL) reporting

A

People
Planet
Profit

30
Q

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

A

Aims to develop:

  • transparency
  • accountability
  • reporting
  • sustainable development
31
Q

EU Ecomanagement & Audit Schemes (EU EMAS)

A
  • voluntary scheme
  • requirements for registration:
    => environmental policy containing commitment to comply with legislation
    => on-site environmental review
    => environmental management system
32
Q

ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standard

A

provides a general framework on which a no. of specific standards have been based