Ch2: Methods in the Study of Personality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Gathering Information
1.1 Sources-Observe Yourself & Observe Others:
A) Introspection

A
  • looking at your own experiences

- problem: special relationship between you and your memories can distort information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

B) Observing others:

A
  • looking at someone else’s experiences

problem: impossibility of really knowing what is going inside the person’s mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2.1 Seeking Depth: Case studies

Point 1: Personology

A

-need to study the person as coherent entity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Point 2: Case study

A

in depth study of one person

  • usually over a long period of time
  • multiple observations
  • rich in detail; compelling examples illustrate broader themes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2.2 Depth from Experience Sampling

Point 1: Experience Sampling

A
  • diary studies
  • conducted over a long period of time
  • person prompted to repeatedly report own experience
  • reduces distortion of faulty memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Point 2: Idiographic method: the specifics and characteristics of individuals

A

-focuses on individual: NOMOTHETIC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2.3 Seeking Generality: studies of many people

Point 1: Generality or generalizability

A
  • how widely a conclusion can be applied
  • generalizable conclusions based on study of many people
  • need to study many types of people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Point 2: Limits to generalizability

A
  • types of people used in the sample

- cultural or sociodemographic differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correlation

A
  • as variables are assessed over many instances, the values on one tend to go together with values on the other in a systematic way
  • direction & strength are two independent aspects of a correlation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Direction

A

positive correlation: if low values on one variable tend to go with low values on the other variable/ or high values match with high values
negative correlation: if high values on one variable to go with low values on the other variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strength

A

degree of accuracy that values of one variable can be predicted with values on another variable
-expressed by a number or correlation coefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Variable

A
  • dimension along which there are at least two values or levels
  • no cause & effect/ inferential correlated
  • suggests a certain level of difference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2 kinds of Significance

A
  1. Statistical significance: when there is a very small probability of obtaining a correlation that is as large or larger than the correlation observed due to chance
    - statistical significance is less than 5%
  2. Clinical significance: when effect is both statistically and clinical significant and its large enough to have practical imporance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Causality

A

relationship between a cause & an effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Experimental method

A
  • manipulate and create at least two levels of independent variables
  • use of random assignment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Experimental control

A

where all conditions are the same except the variable being manipulated

17
Q

Correlational studies

A
  • a study that makes comparisons between groups

- groups represent naturally occurring differences

18
Q

Advtanges & Disadvantages of Experiments

A

can show cause and effect

disadvantages: unclear with aspect of manipulation produced the effect
- results may have something to do with personality

19
Q

Advantages & Disadvantages of Correlational studies

A

advantage: allows study of complex events & conditions that would be unethical to manipulate
disadvantage: cannot show cause and effect

20
Q

Multifacto studies

A

2 or more variables are varied separately

  • uses all combinations of levels of predictor variables
  • can include experimental manipulations & personality variables
21
Q

Experimental personality research

A

-combines experimental procedures and individual differences

22
Q

Main effect

A

-when a predictor variable is linked to the outcome in a systematic way, completely separate of the other predictor

23
Q

Interaction

A
  • when the effect of one predictor variable differs across the levels of the other predictor variables
  • need to study more than one factor at a time