Ch.10, Attraction Flashcards

1
Q

Williams, Ostracism Study

A

When need to belong is thwarted by acts of excluding/ignoring
Ostracism has worse effects on children than bullying
Ostracized people show deficits in brain mechanisms that inhibit unwanted behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cyberostracism

A

Cyberostracism: ostracism on social media, occurs when you feel ignored on social media,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Friendship and Attraction: Proximity

A

Proximity: powerful predictor of whether any two people will become friends
Proximity can also bring hostility, but usually prompts liking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anticipatory Liking:

A

expecting that someone will be pleasant and compatible; increases the chance of a rewarding friendship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mere Exposure Effect

A

Familiarity fosters fondness
People prefer things they have seen more frequently
Violates the common-sense myth of boredom: decreased interest with exposure
Mere exposure effects even occur when people have received the stimuli previously without awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Zajonc and Instant Emotions

A

amygdala acts before cortex
Emotions are often more instant than thinking
Emotions are semi-independent of thinking: affect may precede cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When does physical appearance matter less in dating

A

PHYSICAL APPEARANCE MATTER LESS AMONG COUPLES WHO WERE FRIENDS BEFORE THEY STARTED DATING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Physical-Attractiveness Stereotype:

A

People tend to select people who are similar to their level of intelligence, popularity and self-worth
Physical-Attractiveness Stereotype: what is beautiful is good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evolution and Attraction

A

Beauty signals higher fertility; this is found to be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social Comparisons and attractiveness

A

After we see someone unattractive, we rate ourselves as more attractive and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

False Consensus Bias:

A

assume others share our attitudes
We tend to see those we like as being like us
Attitude alignment helps promote and sustain close relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cultural racism

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Complementarity:

A

may evolve as a relationship progresses, how opposites complement each other, yet most people tend to gravitate toward people similar to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ingratiation:

A

when someone gives us a compliment but it is really just self-serving to themselves?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Self esteem and self-fulfilling prophecies in relationships

A

People with low self-esteem tend to underestimate how much potential partners will like and accept them, then they act as less outgoing and warm than people with high self esteem (kind of brings about a self-fulfilling prophecy effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reward Theory of Attraction

A

those who reward us, or whom we associate rewards with, we like
Conditioning creates positive feelings towards things and people linked with rewarding events
Proximity is rewarding: lives close by
Others have similar opinions = we feel rewarded because we presume they like us in return
We like those who like us

17
Q

Difference between passionate and compassionate love

A

Passionate: Functions on testosterone, dopamine, adrenaline
Compassionate: Functions on oxytocin and attachment

18
Q

Vassopressin

A

Genes associated with vasopressin activity predicts marital stability; vasopressin produces good feelings

19
Q

Attachment styles and internal working models, causes of attachment styles

A

Secure attachment: distress when leaves, run to mother when comes back, then relax
Avoidant: doesn’t care
Anxious attachment: distress when leaving, be indifferent or hostile when comes back
Internal Working Models: characteristic ways of thinking about relationships from young age
THERE IS INTERGENERATIONAL CONSISTENCY OF ATTACHMENT STYLES
MAY BE PARTIALLY BASED IN INHERITED TEMPERAMENT

20
Q

EQUITY Principle of Attraction pg. 376

A

What you and your partner get out of a relationship should be proportional to what you each put into it
Long term equity
Those who perceive that they are in an equitable relationship are typically content
Those who perceive more inequity are less happy

21
Q

Self-Disclosure/ Disclosure Reciprocity effect

A

Free to open up about ourselves without fear of losing the other’s affection
Self disclosure in general is correlated with being happier
Disclosure Reciprocity Effect: disclosure begets disclosure, we reveal more to those who have been open with us

22
Q

Passive vs active responses to relational distress

A

Passive Responses to relational distress: loyalty by awaiting improvement and neglect by ignoring partner
Active Responses to relational distress: voice, seek to improve relationship or exit and end relationship

23
Q

Two factor theory of emotion

A

The two-factor theory of emotion suggests that in a romantic context, arousal from any source, even painful experiences, can be steered into passion.

24
Q

Communal Relationships:

A

giving and receiving is based on the principle of need, you expect these relationships to be longterm, relationship where you feel special responsibility for the wellbeing of that person; Family members, romantic partners, friends

25
Q

Exchange relationships

A

Exchange Relationships: no responsibility for the wellbeing of that person, based on RECIPROCITY and equity, not expected to be longterm in nature, relationships health and needs interactions, business interactions

26
Q

Equity Theory vs equality

A

feeling psychologically that you have when you are psychologically interpreting how things are going in a relationship and evaluating the inputs and outs of that relationship between you and the other person (ITS AN EQUATION WHERE THE BALANCE COMPLETELY RESIDES IN THE RATIO)
NOT maximizing the benefits
We proportionally have the benefits to the costs that the relationship comes with
NOT equality: you don’t get the same outputs out of the relationship as the other person; you can get more out of it, which is fine if you put more in yourself, ratio should be proportional on either side but numbers dont have to be the same

27
Q

Westgate West Housing Study and proximity

A

students randomly assigned to residences, asked which students they socialize the most with, every student that responded said that two of these people lived in their building and at least one of those people was living next door to them

28
Q

Primary School Classroom Study, proximity and friendships

A

students randomly assigned seating, boys who sat together were much more likely to be friends and same with girls, boy and girl sitting next to each other are not very likely to be friends

29
Q

Homophily

A

Homophily: tendency for friendships to form between those who are alike; similar age, gender, race, education, status, behavior, political views, etc. (tend to think of our own traits as good and therefore seek others with them)

30
Q

Mere Exposure Effect

A

Tendency for novel stimuli to be liked more or rated more positivity after the rater has been repeatedly exposed to them
Prefer familiarity: if you have seen someone several times and there hasn’t been a negative interaction, you know that they are safe

31
Q

Functional Distance

A

Likelihood that people will have the opportunity to interact based on schedules and general opportunities

32
Q

Anticipation of Interaction and ratings study

A

Anticipation of Interaction Study: participants were asked to rate people as pleasant or unpleasant before meeting them agreeable/disagreeable, then told they would meet the person but their rating of them wouldn’t be shared
RESULTS: if you expect to meet someone, even though they are unpleasant and you disagree with them, your rating of liking increases
THIS IS ADAPTIVE: if you’re inevitably going to meet someone and you have no choice, you need to at least try and give them a chance/avoid conflict by at least perceiving them as a bit more likable

33
Q

Fateous Love

A

Passion and commitment
Romantic: passion and intimacy
Compassionate: commitment and intimacy