Ch. 8 Flashcards
Extinction
Extinction is the non reinforcement of a previously reinforced response, the result of which is a decrease in the future strength of that response.
As with the classical conditioning version of extinction, the term extinction in operant conditioning refers to both a procedure and a process.
The procedure of extinction is the nonreinforcement of a previously reinforced response; the process of extinction is the resultant decrease in response strength
An error students sometimes make is to use the term extinction when referring ___
to any decrease in the strength of a behavior.
This is incorrect.
The term extinction should be used only when referring to a decrease in the future strength of a behavior that is caused by the removal of the reinforcer for that behavior.
A behavior can be weakened or eliminated in several ways, extinction being only one of them.
A behavior can be weakened or eliminated in several ways, extinction being only one of them.
For example, we can get a rat to stop pressing a lever for food by
(1) no longer giving it food when it presses the lever,
(2) giving it a shock when it presses the lever. or
(3) giving it lots of free food ahead of time so that it is no longer hungry.
Only the first is an example of extinction; the second is an example of positive punishment; and the third is an example of an abolishing operation (specifically a satiation procedure) which reduces the value of the reinforcer.
We could also stop the rat from pressing the lever by simply removing the lever from the chamber, in the same way that parents might take away a child’s iPad to stop them from playing with it. That too is not an example of extinction because it simply prevents the behavior from occurring.
Side Effects of Extinction
When an extinction procedure is implemented, it is often accompanied by certain side effects.
It is important to be aware of these side effects because they can mislead one into believing that an extinction procedure is not having an effect when in fact it is.
Note, too, that these side effects can be inadvertently strengthened if one suddenly gives in and provides the subject with the sought-after reinforcer.
Extinction Burst
The implementation of an extinction procedure does not always result in an immediate decrease in responding. Instead, one often finds an extinction burst, a temporary increase in the frequency and intensity of responding when extinction is first implemented.
Increase in Variability
An extinction procedure can also result in an increase in the variability of a behavior.
For example, a rat whose lever pressing no longer produces food might vary the manner in which it presses the lever. If the rat typically pressed the lever with its right paw, it might now try pressing it with its left paw.
Emotional Behavior
Extinction is often accompanied by emotional behavior.
The hungry pigeon that suddenly finds that key pecking no longer produces food soon becomes agitated (as evidenced, for example, by quick jerky movements and wing flapping).
Likewise, people often become upset when confronted by a candy machine that does not deliver the goods.
Such emotional responses are what we typically refer to as frustration.
Aggression.
One type of emotional behavior that is particularly common during an extinction procedure is aggression.
In fact, extinction procedures have been used to study aggressive behavior in animals.
For example, research has shown that a pigeon whose key pecking for food is placed on extinction will reliably attack another pigeon (or model of a pigeon) that happens to be nearby
Extinction-induced aggression (also called frustration-induced aggression) is also common in humans.
People often become angry with those who block them from obtaining an important goal.
Resurgence
A rather unusual side effect of extinction is resurgence, the reappearance during extinction of other behaviors that had previously (sometime in the past) been effective in obtaining reinforcement.
Resurgence resembles the psychoanalytic concept of regression, which is the reappearance of immature behavior in reaction to frustration or conflict.
Thus, someone whose partner largely ignores them might begin spending increasing amounts of time at their parents’ house. Faced with the lack of reinforcement in a romantic relationship, they return to a setting that once provided a rich source of reinforcement.
Depression.
Extinction can also lead to depressive-like symptoms.
For example, Klinger, Barta, and Kemble (1974) had rats run down an alleyway for food and immediately followed this with an assessment of the rats’ activity level in an open field test.
Thus, each session consisted of two phases:
(1) running down an alleyway for food, followed by
(2) placement in an open area that the rats could freely explore.
When extinction was implemented on the alleyway task, activity in the open field test first increased to above normal (a sort of generalized extinction burst), then decreased to below normal, followed by a return to normal
Resistance to Extinction
is the extent to which responding persists after an extinction procedure has been implemented.
A response that is very persistent is said to have high resistance to extinction, while a response that disappears quickly is said to have low resistance to extinction.
partial reinforcement effect
The schedule of reinforcement is the most important factor influencing resistance to extinction.
According to the partial reinforcement effect, behavior that has been maintained on an intermittent (partial) schedule of reinforcement will extinguish more slowly than behavior that has been maintained on a continuous schedule.
Resistance to extinction is particularly strong when behavior has been maintained on a variable interval (VI) or variable ratio (VR) schedule.
One way of thinking about the partial reinforcement effect is that the less frequent and less predictable the reinforcer, the longer it takes the person or animal to “discover” that reinforcement is no longer available
A less mentalistic interpretation is that there is a much greater contrast between a CRF schedule and extinction than between a VR 100 schedule and extinction.
The partial reinforcement effect helps account for certain types of __
annoying or maladaptive behaviors that are difficult to eliminate.
Dogs that beg for food are often extremely persistent.
Paradoxically, as mentioned earlier, this is sometimes the result of previously unsuccessful attempts at extinction. Imagine, for example, that all family members agree to stop feeding the dog at the dinner table.
If one person nevertheless slips the dog a morsel when it is making a particularly big fuss, the begging will become both more intense and more persistent.
This means that the next attempt at extinction will be even more difficult.
Of course, the partial reinforcement effect also suggests a possible solution to this problem.
If behavior that has been continuously reinforced is less resistant to extinction, it might help to first spend several days reinforcing each instance of begging.
Then, when extinction is implemented, the dog’s tendency to beg might extinguish more rapidly
History of reinforcement
In general, the more reinforcers that an individual has received for a behavior, the greater the resistance to extinction.
a child who has only recently picked up the habit of whining for candy should stop whining relatively quickly when the behavior is placed on extinction, as opposed to a child who has been at it for several months.
From a practical perspective, this means it is much easier to extinguish an unwanted behavior, such as whining for candy, when it first becomes evident (hence the saying, “nip it in the bud”).
There is, however, a limit in the extent to which further reinforcers will produce increased resistance to extinction.
Furomoto (1971), for example, found that resistance to extinction for key pecking in pigeons reached its maximum after about 1,000 reinforcers.
Magnitude of the Reinforcer
The magnitude of the reinforcer can also affect resistance to extinction.
For example, large-magnitude reinforcers sometimes result in greater resistance to extinction than small-magnitude reinforcers.
Thus, lever pressing might take longer to extinguish following a training period in which each reinforcer consisted of a large pellet of food than if the reinforcer were a small pellet of food.
Lever pressing might also take longer to extinguish if the reinforcer was a highly preferred food item than if it were a less-preferred food item.
From a practical perspective, this means that a dog’s behavior of begging at the dinner table might extinguish more easily if you first spend several days feeding it small bites of less-preferred morsels.
Unfortunately, one problem with this strategy is that the effect of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to extinction is not entirely consistent.
In fact, researchers sometimes find that smaller reinforcers result in greater resistance to extinction
Degree of Deprivation
Not surprisingly, the degree to which an organism is deprived of a reinforcer also affects resistance to extinction.
In general, the greater the level of deprivation, the greater the resistance to extinction.
A rat that is only slightly hungry will cease lever pressing more quickly than a rat that is very hungry. This suggests yet another strategy for extinguishing a dog’s tendency to beg at the table: feed the dog before the meal.
Previous Experience with Extinction
When sessions of extinction are alternated with sessions of reinforcement, the greater the number of exposures to extinction, the quicker the behavior will extinguish during subsequent exposures.
For example, if a rat experiences several sessions of extinction randomly interspersed with several sessions of reinforcement, it will eventually learn to stop lever pressing soon after the start of an extinction session.
The rat has learned that if it has not received reinforcement soon after the start of a session, it is likely that no reinforcement will be forthcoming for the remainder of the session.
This also leads to the prediction that people who have been through relationship breakups on numerous occasions will more quickly get over such breakups, when compared to people who have had fewer breakup experiences.