Ch. 12 Flashcards
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
Ex: backwards conditioning
Fear conditioning is one form of classical conditioning in which preparedness seems to play an important role.
backward conditioning —> the US precedes the NS typically produces little if any conditioning.
However, under some circumstances, backward conditioning can be achieved, such as when the NS is a “biologically relevant” stimulus for fear.
Some proposed that many species of animals (including people) have an inherited predisposition to fear certain types of events.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
taste aversion conditioning,
a form of classical conditioning in which a food item that has been paired with gastrointestinal illness becomes a conditioned aversive stimulus.
Simply put, an animal that becomes sick after ingesting a food item associates the food with the illness and subsequently finds it distasteful.
Taste aversion conditioning involves many of the same processes found in other forms of classical conditioning.
— For example, stimulus generalization often occurs when food items that taste similar to the aversive item are also perceived as aversive.
A conditioned taste aversion can be extinguished if the aversive food item is repeatedly ingested without further illness.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
overshadowing
In keeping with the overshadowing effect, the strongest-tasting item in a meal is most likely to become associated with a subsequent illness.
As well, a food item that was previously associated with illness will likely block the development of aversive associations to other items in a meal.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
latent inhibition
We are more likely to associate a relatively novel item, such as an unusual liqueur, with sickness than we would a more familiar item such as beer.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
preparedness
The term preparedness refers to an innate tendency for an organism to more easily learn certain types of behaviors or to associate certain types of events with each other.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
Although taste aversion conditioning is in many ways similar to other forms of classical conditioning, there are also major differences.
- The Formation of Associations over Long Delays.
—In most classical conditioning procedures, the neutral stimulus (NS) and uncond itioned stimulus (US) must occur in close temporal proximity, separated by no more than a few seconds.
—By contrast, taste aversions can develop when food items are consumed several hours before the sickness develops.
—ability to associate food with illness after lengthy periods of time is highly adaptive. If animals were unable to form such delayed associations, they would be at great risk of repeatedly consuming a poisonous food item and eventually perishing. - One-Trial Conditioning.
—Strong conditioned taste aversions can usually be achieved with only a single pairing of food with illness, particularly when the food item is novel.
— this sometimes occurs in other forms of conditioning, especially fear conditioning, but not as consistently as it does in taste aversion conditioning.
—is highly adaptive insofar as it minimizes the possibility of a repeat, possibly fatal, experience with a poisonous substance. - Specificity of Associations.
—When you feel nauseous following a meal, do you associate the nausea with that episode of American Idol you are watching (even though, given the quality of some of the singing, that might seem appropriate), or with the meal? —> the meal
—seems to be a strong, inherited tendency to associate a gastrointestinal illness with food or drink rather than with any other kind of item
—This type of preparedness is sometimes referred to as CS-US relevance, an innate tendency to more readily associate certain types of stimuli with each other.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
excellent example of the role of CS-US relevance in taste aversion conditioning by Garcia and Koelling
In this experiment:
- rats initially drank sweet water that was paired with a light and a noise (each time they licked the water tube, they heard a click and saw a light flash). (compound stimulus)
- some of the rats received a slight foot shock that elicited a fear reaction.
- while other rats received a dose of X-ray irradiation that made them nauseous
- Finally, all of the rats were given a choice between two water bottles
Conditioning trial:
Bright, noisy, sweet water (NS): X-ray irradiation (US) -› Nausea (UR)
Test trial:
Sweet water (CS) -› Nausea(CR)
Bright, noisy water (NS) -› No nausea (—)
- Rats made nauseous by the X-ray irradiation avoided the sweet water and
drank the bright, noisy water. - rats that received a foot shock avoided the bright, noisy water but not the sweet water.
—they developed a fear of the noise and lights that had been combined with the water, but not the taste, and were therefore quite willing to drink the sweet water.
Conditioning trial:
Bright, noisy, sweet water (NS): Foot shock (US) -> Fear (UR)
Test trial:
Bright, noisy water (CS) -> Fear(CR)
Sweet water (NS) -› No fear (—)
- rats have a predisposition to readily associate nausea with taste and a predisposition to associate actually painful events with visual and auditory stimuli.
Preparedness in Classical Conditioning
Distinctive features of taste aversion conditioning, compared to other types of classical conditioning, include the fact that the associations can be formed over ___ delays, typically require ___ pairing(s) of the NS and US, and ___ specific to certain types of stimuli.
In the experiment on taste aversions in quail and rats, the rats avoided the ___ water, while the quail avoided the ___ water.
- long
- One
- Are
- Sour
- Blue
Preparedness in Operant Conditioning
- Chaffinches easily learn to associate perching with the consequence of hearing a song and pecking with with the consequence of obtaining food.
—biologically prepared to associate - Rats are biologically prepared to learn to avoid a painful stimulus by running, while pigeons are biologically prepared to learn to avoid a painful stimulus by flying.
—Biological dispositions for certain types of avoidance responses - According to Bolles, these types of avoidance responses are species specific defence reactions (abbreviated) SSDR that are naturally elicited by the aversive stimulus.
—in the natural environment is often effective in countering danger
—some avoidance responses are actually not operants (in the sense of being controlled by their consequences) but are instead elicited behaviors (that are controlled by the stimuli that precede them.
Instinctive Drift
which is a type of classical conditioning in which an innate fixed action pattern gradually emerges and displaces a behavior that is being operantly conditioned.
In the experiment with the raccoon, the coin became a ___that elicited a(n) ___
of washing and rubbing.
Marian and Keller Breland were former students of Skinner’s.
- CS/SD
- CS:CR
They encountered some rather interesting limitations in what certain animals could be taught.
—attempted to train a pig to deposit a wooden coin in a piggy bank. Using processes of shaping and chaining, which went smoothly at first
— pig no longer simply deposited the coin in the bank but started tossing the coin in the air and then rooting at it on the ground. Eventually, the tossing and rooting became so frequent that the coin never made its way to the bank.
For pig:
Coin (SD): Deposit coin in bank (R) - > Food (SR)
Coin (NS): Food (US) - >Rooting (UR)
Coin (CS) —> rooting (CR)
sign tracking
In sign tracking, an organism approaches a stimulus that signals the presentation of an appetitive event.
The approach behavior seems very much like an operant behavior because it appears to be quite goal directed, yet the procedure that produces it is more closely akin to classical conditioning.
Thus, sign tracking is yet another way in which classical and operant conditioning appear to overlap.
autoshaping
a type of sign tracking in which a pigeon comes to automatically peck at a response key because the key light has been associated with the noncontingent (response-independent) delivery of food.
Thus, a behavior that starts off as an elicited behavior (controlled by the stimulus that precedes it) becomes transformed into an operant behavior (controlled mostly by its consequence).
Autoshaping is one type of classical conditioning that fits well with Pavlov’s stimulus-substitution theory.
Because of its association with food, the key light appears to become a substitute for food, with the bird attempting to consume it.
negative automaintenance
pigeons will peck a lit response key that signals food delivery even though the act of pecking prevents the delivery of food.
Adjunctive behavior
is an excessive pattern of behavior that emerges as a by-product of certain types of intermittent schedules of reinforcement for some other behavior.
In other words, as one behavior is being strengthened through intermittent reinforcement, another quite different behavior emerges as a side effect of that procedure.
Adjunctive behavior is sometimes referred to as schedule-induced behavior.