CH 12: Hunger, Eating & Health Flashcards
Describe the process of DIGESTION.
DIGESTION:
- GI process of breaking down food & absorbing its constituents into body
- -> Break down food via gut micro biome = bacteria that live inside our GI tract
Explain how energy is stored in the body.
- E delivered to body in 3 forms (lipids, AA’s, glucose)
- E stored in body in 3 forms (fats, proteins, glycogen)
- -> Most E stored as FAT (rather than glycogen) bc:
1. 1g fat can store 2x E as 1g glycogen
2. Glycogen, unlike fat, attracts & holds ^quantities of H2O - -> weighs more
List the 3 phases of energy metabolism.
- Cephalic Phase
- Absorptive Phase
- Fasting Phase
Describe the CEPHALIC PHASE.
- Cephalic Phase:
= Preparatory phase
- Begins w/ sight, smell or thought of food
- Ends when food starts to be absorbed into bloodstream
Describe the ABSORPTIVE PHASE.
- Absorptive Phase:
- When E absorbed into bloodstream from meal is meeting the body’s immediate E needs
Describe the FASTING PHASE.
- Fasting Phase:
- When all unstirred E from previous meal has been used & body is withdrawing E from its reserves to meet its immediate E requirements
- Ends w/ beginning of next cephalic phase
Describe the SET-POINT ASSUMPTION.
Set-Point Assumption:
- Meal continues until the E level (required for physiological functioning) returns to its set point & the person no longer feels hungry
- (-) feedback sys
- -> Acts to maintain homeostasis
- aka assumes hunger & eating work in same way as a thermostat-regulated heating system in cool climate
Describe the GLUCOSTATIC Set-Point Theory.
What is it thought to account for?
Glucostatic Theory:
- We become hungry when our blood glucose levels drop significantly below their set point
- We become satiated (not hungry) when eating returns our blood glucose levels to their set point
–> Thought to account for meal initiation & termination
Describe the LIPOSTATIC Set-Point Theory.
What evidence supports this?
What is it thought to account for?
Lipostatic Theory:
- Every person has a set point for body fat, & deviations from this set point produce compensatory adjustments int he level of eating that return levels of body fat to their set point
- Support: adults’ body weight stay relatively consistent
–> Thought to account for long-term regulation.
Outline 3 problems w/ set-point theories of hunger & eating.
- They’re inconsistent w/ basic eating-related evolutionary pressures
- Ancestors didn’t know when get next meal
- -> Eat large quantities of food when available - Major predictions of these theories haven’t been confirmed
- ie) efforts to reduce meal-size by having ppl unknowingly consume high-calorie drink before eating have been unsuccessful - These theories are deficient bc they fail to recognize the major influences on hunger & eating ie) taste, learning, social influences
Describe the POSITIVE-INCENTIVE THEORY
Positive-Incentive Theory:
- we’re drawn to eat via anticipated pleasure of eating (rather than by internal E deficits)
- The degree of hunger you feel at depends on interaction of all the factors that influence the positive incentive value of eating
- -> ie) food flavour, amount of time since last ate, quantity of food in gut, social aspects, etc.
Describe 2 factors that determine WHAT we eat.
- LEARNED TASTE PREFERENCES & AVERSIONS:
- Learn to prefer tastes followed by ^^calories
- Learn to avoid tastes followed by illness
- Influenced by conspecifics (i.e. cultural preferences) - LEARNING TO EAT VITAMINS & MINERALS:
- Vitamin deficiencies influence diet selection
- Low Na+ –> imm. preference for sodium salt taste
- Low vitamin/mineral –> learn to consume foods that are rich in the missing nutrient by experiencing their positive effects
Describe 2 factors that determine WHEN we eat.
- PREMEAL HUNGER:
- Right before usual meal time, body defends its homeostasis by entering the CEPHALIC phase
- -> Takes steps to soften impact of impeding homeostasis-disturbing influx
- -> Releases insulin into blood
- -> Reduces blood glucose
- **Mealtime hunger is caused by expectation of food, NOT by an E deficit
- PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONING OF HUNGER:
- Experiment where rats trained to eat each time buzzer & light were presented, even though recently completed a meal
List 6 factors that influence HOW MUCH we eat.
- Satiety signals
- Sham eating
- Appetizer effect & satiety
- Serving size & satiety
- Social influences & satiety
- Sensory-specific satiety
Define SATIETY.
Describe how Satiety Signals influence HOW MUCH we eat.
SATIETY:
= Motivational state that causes us to stop eating a meal when there’s food remaining
–> Triggered by food in gut & glucose entering blood
- Satiety signals depend on V of NUTRITIVE DENSITY (=calories per unit V) of the food
- -> Once a stable baseline of consumption established, nutritive density of diet changes
- -> Learn to adjust food V to maintain stable caloric intake & body weight
Define SHAM EATING.
Describe how Sham Eating influences HOW MUCH we eat.
SHAM EATING:
= Experimental protocol where animal chews & swallows food, after which the food immediately exits the body through a tube implanted in its esophagus
- Predict that sham eating meals would be ^^larger
- -> But experiments w/ rats showed that meal size were the same
- -> ***aka satiety is function of previous experience, not the current increases in body’s E resources
Define APPETIZER EFFECT.
Describe how the Appetizer Effect & satiety influence HOW MUCH we eat.
APPETIZER EFFECT:
= The increase in hunger produced by the consumption of small amounts of food
- Occurs bc consumption of small amounts of food elicits cephalic-phase responds
–> Appetizer Effect decreases satiety?
Describe how Serving Size & satiety influence HOW MUCH we eat.
- Amount consumed informed by serving size
- -> Larger servings = more we eat