CFA L2 Portfolio Management Flashcards
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
Shares in an index-tracking portfolio that trade on a secondary market. While most ETFs are based on direct investments in underlying securities, ETFs can also utilize derivatives, invest via American depositary receipts (ADRs), or use leverage.
- ETFs tend to distribute far less in capital gains relative to mutual funds. This is mostly due to the fact that ETFs have historically had significantly lower turnover than mutual funds have had.
- Return-of-capital (ROC) distributions are generally not taxable.
Market maker
A firm/individual who actively quotes two-sided markets in a particular security by providing bids and asks.
Authorized participants (APs)
Large broker-dealers (BDs) that make the market in an ETF. APs are permitted to create additional shares, or redeem existing shares, for a service fee payable to the ETF manager. This creation/redemption process is in-kind.
Since the large BDs often have the securities inside the ETF, they will give the ETF manager the securities in exhange for shares in the ETF. This process creates tax efficiencies.
Creation basket
The list of required in-kind securities that go into the ETF. The ETF manager will publicly disclose these each day.
- The creation basket is a key input in determining the net asset value (NAV).
Redemption basket
The specific securities the AP receives after redeeming the ETF.
Redemption process: opposite of the creation process- the AP receives the basket of securities and gives back their shares of the ETF.
What are the 3 purposes that the in-kind process serves?
- Lower cost: eliminates transaction costs.
- Tax efficiency: The creation/redemption process IS NOT a taxable event
- Keeping market prices in line w/ NAV: APs will engage in arbitrage transactions if the ETFs trade at a price significantly different from their NAV. If the ETF trades at a premium, APs can sell the ETF and if it trades at a discount, they can buy.
True or false: The APs incur any transaction costs associated w/ creating the basket as well as any service fees the ETF manager charges for redeeming the basket?
True
Arbitrage gap
The transaction costs/service fees that APs incur creates an arbitrage gap: a range of prices that an ETF should trade at.
- Because the liquidity of the securities in the basket determines the transaction cost, the arbitrage gap tends to be wider for ETFs with illiquid holdings
- ETFs that track foreign indices may have wider gaps due to time zone differences.
- APs pass on these costs in the form of bid-ask spreads on ETFs, which means that only transacting shareholders pay these costs, unlike with mutual funds where all shareholders bear this cost. Similarly, unlike mutual funds, ETFs are tax fair because redemptions are in kind and do not affect the nontransacting shareholders.
- Even the closing price of the ETF on the exchange includes a premium or discount to the NAV, driven by supply and demand factors on the exchange and the market impact costs of executing an exchange transaction.
National Security Clearing Corporation (NSCC)
The organization in the U.S. that guarantees the performance of parties to a trade on an exchange.
The Depository Trust Company (DTC)
A subsidiary of NSCC that transfers the securities from the account of the seller’s broker to the account of buyer’s broker. There is a two-day settlement period for ETFs.
- Six day period for APs.
Tracking difference
The difference between the return on the ETF and the index’s return.
- An ETF is most likely to underperform its benchmark by the expense ratio.
Tracking error/rolling return assessment
The ANNUALIZED standard deviation of the DAILY tracking difference. There are 2 types of tracking error:
1. Ex-post tracking error (backward looking): A measure of a portfolio’s tracking error relative to a benchmark portfolio over a lookback period
2. Ex-ante tracking error (forward looking)
- Also known as a rolling return assessment.
Sources of tracking error:
- Fees and expenses that ETF holders pay to the ETF manager(s).
- Sampling and optimization: ETFs may use statistical techniques to replicate the performance of a benchmark without investing in all the securities that the index covers.
- Depository receipts: Any difference between the price of the DR and the price of the security.
- Index changes: Periodically the composition of the index that the ETF tracks may be changed. Since the ETF manager and AP may have to sell/buy new securities this will cost a fee.
- Regulatory and tax requirements
- Fund accounting practices
- Asset manager operations: ETF managers may try to lower their cost by lending their shares to short sellers, and by foreign dividend capture (i.e., by working with foreign governments to minimize the taxes on distributions received). These methods tend to improve ETF performance relative to their benchmark.
- ETF ownership costs are least likely to be increased by security lending.
- Changes to the underlying index is most likely to be the smallest contributor to tracking error.
Primary determinants of bid-ask spreads
liquidity and market structure of underlying securities
- Spreads on fixed-income ETFs tend to require a higher spread
- Specialized ETFs that focus on one commodity, sector, etc. demand a higher spread.
Maximum spread
creation/redemption fee + other trading costs + spread of the underlying securities + risk premium for carrying the trade until the end of closing + APs normal profit margin - discount based on probability of offsetting the trade in secondary market
* the bid-ask spread on an ETF cannot be higher than this
Indicated NAVs
Intraday estimates of NAV
- A price of an ETF trading above its NAV is trading at a premium and vice versa at a discount
ETF premium/discount formula:
(Price of ETF - NAV) ÷ NAV
Sources of ETF premiums/discounts
- Timing differences: ETFs on foreign securities may experience gaps between the time the ETF is traded and the time when the underlying trades in a foreign market. Similarly, OTC bonds that do not trade on an exchange will not have a true closing price; hence, the price of an ETF that comprises such bonds may not be equal to estimated NAV.
- Stale pricing: Infrequently traded ETFs may reflect noncurrent prices and, therefore, their value may differ from NAV.
Costs of owning an ETF
- Mgmt fees: Since passively managed, these tend to be lower than mutual funds
- Trading fees: Includes brokerage/commission fees and bid-ask spreads.
- Long-term investors will be more concerned w/ mgmt. fees whereas short-term investors are more concerned w/ trading fees.
Round-trip trading cost of owning an ETF
Round-trip commission + spread
Total cost of owning an ETF
Round-trip trading cost + mgmt. fees
Example: Costs of owning an ETF
Z&E ETF is quoted at a bid-ask spread of 0.15%. ETF commissions are 0.10% of the trade value. Management fees are 0.08% per year
Calculate the cost of holding the ETF for 3 months, for 1 year, and for 5 years. For the 5-year holding period, also calculate the average annual total cost.
3 months: [ (0.10 * 2) + 0.15 ] + [ (3/12) * 0.08 ] = 0.37%
1 year: [ (0.10 * 2) + 0.15 ] + 0.08 = 0.43%
5 years: [ (0.10 * 2) + 0.15 ] + [ 5 * 0.08 ] = 0.75%
Avg. annual cost = 0.75 ÷ 5 = 0.15%
Types of ETF risks:
- Counterparty risk
- Settlement risk: ETFs using OTC derivative contracts as part of their strategy expose investors to the settlement risk of such contracts.
- Security lending: Like mutual funds, ETFs may lend their securities to short sellers for a fee.
- Fund closure: ETF closures involve selling the underlying holdings and making cash distributions to the investors, potentially with adverse tax consequences for them.
- Expectation-related risk:
True or false: Exchange-traded notes (ETNs) have low counterparty risk?
False, ETNs have high counterparty risk
Exchange-traded note (ETN)
Unsecured debt securities that track an underlying index of securities and trade on a major exchange like a stock. If the underlying index returns 5%, the ETN will return 5% to its investors. Just like a bond, if the underwriter of the ETN goes bankrupt, the investor risks total loss.
- Unlike ETFs, ETNs do not hold the underlying securities.
- Similar to ETFs, ETNs use the creation/redemption process and trade on major exchanges.
How do banks use ETNs?
If a bank wants to issue unsecured debt at a fixed rate but the market int. rate is significantly higher than the swap rate, the bank may instead issue an ETN that pays the return on an equity index. The bank then would simultaneously enter into an equity swap as the equity return receiver and the (swap) fixed rate payer. The index return received is used to service the ETF, and the bank’s effective borrowing cost becomes the swap fixed rate.
Portfolio uses of ETFs
- Efficient portfolio mgmt.
- Asset class exposure mgmt.
- Active investing
Efficient portfolio management
- Portfolio liquidity mgmt: Excess cash can quickly and easily be invested into ETFs
- Portfolio rebalancing: ETFs can be used to cost-effectively rebalance portfolios to target specific asset class weights.
- Portfolio completion: ETFs can be used to fill temporary gaps in portfolio allocation that can arise due to new PMs coming in or investors wanting different exposures to new asset classes
- Transition manager: A new PM can temporarily invest in ETFs when winding down the allocations of the old PM, so as to maintain market exposure during the transition period.
True or false: ETFs are often suitable for very high net worth individuals?
False, often these individuals will invest in separately managed accounts (SMAs) that can offer lower costs.
Factor ETFs/Smart beta ETFs
An ETF that is benchmarked to an index but has pre-defined rules. These are active ETF strategies that seek to outperform the benchmark. Long-term buy-and-hold investors seeking a desired factor exposure may choose to invest in these ETFs in the expectation of outperformance of that factor.
Alternatively weighted ETFs
ETFs constructed using portfolio weights that differ from standard market cap weights (ex: equally weighted, weightings based on fundamentals).
Discretionary Active ETFs
Actively managed and are similar to closed-end mutual funds. The largest of these are fixed-income ETFs, which include exposures to senior bank loans, mortgage securities, and floating rate notes.
Dynamic asset allocations and multi-asset strategies
Dynamic top-down asset allocation ETFs that invest in stocks and bonds based on risk/return forecasts. These are popular among global asset managers and hedge funds for their discretionary asset allocation.
Capital asset pricing model
A model that is used to calculate the expected return of a security based on its systematic risk. This model says that there is only one priced risk factor- systematic risk (a.k.a. market risk).
Formula: Rp = Rf + β(market risk premium)
- Ri = Return on asset/portfolio i.
- The more systematic risk, the higher the expected return, according to this model.
- This model was created by William Sharpe in 1964.
- Multifactor models, as opposed to CAPM, say that there are multiple risk factors priced in by the market as opposed to one.
Arbitrage pricing theory (APT)
An alternative to the CAPM model that is a multifactor linear model w/ multiple systematic risk factors priced by the market. However, unlike CAPM, APT does not identify the specific risk factors (or even the number of factors).
- This model was created by Stephen Ross in 1976.
- This is an equilibrium pricing model.
- APT does not require that security returns be normally distributed.
Assumptions of APT:
- Unsystematic risk can be diversified away in a portfolio.
- Returns are generated using a k-factor model.
- No arbitrage opportunities exist.
Arbitrage pricing model
The asset pricing model developed by the APT.
Formula: Rp = Rf + β1 λ1 … + βnλn
- λ = expected risk premium associated with each risk factor
- β = the factor sensitivity of Portfolio P to that risk factor.
- Unlike the CAPM, the APT does not require that one of the risk factors is the market portfolio.
Arbitrage opportunity example:
Given:
Portfolio A has an expected return of 10% and a beta of 1.0
Portfolio B has an expected return of 20% and a beta of 2.0
Portfolio C has an expected return of 13% and a beta of 1.5
Construct an arbitrage opportunity
- We can construct a new portfolio, portfolio X
- If we allocate 50% of portfolio X to hold portfolio A and the other 50% to portfolio B- beta of portfolio X = 0.5(1) + 0.5(2) = 1.5
- Expected return of portfolio X = 0.5(0.1) + 0.5(0.2) = 0.15
- Therefore, Portfolio X has the same beta as portfolio C but a higher expected return.
- We can short portfolio C and long portfolio X to where there’s no risk and also no upfront cost.
- Generally, we want to go long assets that have a high ratio of return-per-unit-of-factor-exposure, and short assets that have a low return-to-factor-exposure ratio
3 classifications of multifactor models:
- Macroeconomic multifactor models
- Fundamental factor models
- Statistical factor models
Macroeconomic multifactor models
Returns on assets are a result of surprises in macroeconomic results.
Ex: If GDP was expected to grow at 2% but it actaully grows at 2.5%, this difference will drive positive results.
- Betas in these models are regression based
- The error term in a macroeconomic multifactor model is company-specific risk.
Fundamental factor models
Asset returns are explained by multiple firm-specific factors. Factors in these models are returns, not surprises.
Ex: P/E ratio, market cap, leverage ratio
- Betas in these models are standardized from attribute data
- Returns are based on multiple regression analysis.
- The intercept of a fundamental factor model with standardized sensitivities has no economic interpretation; it is simply the regression intercept necessary to make the unsystematic risk of the asset equal to zero.
Statistical factor models
Use statistical models to explain asset returns. The two primary types of statistical factor models are:
1. Factor analysis
2. Principal component models
- The main weakness w/ these models is that they do not lend themselves well to economic interpretation.
Differences between macroeconomic multifactor models and fundamental factor models
Macroeconomic multifactor models
* The regression is a time series of economic surprises
* The betas are regression-based
* The factors are surprises in macroeconomic variables
* The intercept is the expected return
Fundamental multifactor models
* The regression is cross sectional asset returns
* The betas are standardized from attribute data
* The factors are computed from multiple regression
* The intercept is undefined
Factor analysis models
Models where factors are portfolios that explain covariance in asset returns.
Principal component models
Models where factors are portfolios that explain the variance in asset returns.
Priced risk factors
1/2 main features of the macroeconomic multifactor model. These are risks that are priced into the market that CANNOT be diversified away.
- Risks that can be diversified away ARE NOT priced.
Factor sensitivities
1/2 main features of the macroeconomic multifactor model. Since different assets/stocks have different magnitudes of reactions to stocks, we need to account for this w/ sensitivities.
Ex: Cyclical industries will react differently to negative macroeconomic surprises compared to defensive industries.
Beta for fundamental multifactor model calculation:
(value of attribute k for asset i - avg. value of attribute k) ÷ st. deviation of avg. values of attribute k
Most common uses of multifactor models:
- Return attribution
- Risk attribution
- Portfolio construction
Return attribution
Being able to pinpoint where a portfolio’s returns are coming from.
Active return
The difference between an actively managed portfolio’s returns and its benchmark
Formula: Rportfolio - Rbenchmark
- Can be measured ex-ante (based on expectations) or can be measured ex-post (after-the-fact).
Sources of active return
factor return + security selection
Factor return
Return that is generated from deviations of asset class portfolio weights from benchmark weights. Ex: PMs weighting their portfolios towards more Mid-cap banks than what is in the benchmark.
Formula: Σ[ (βportfolio - βbenchmark) * λk ]
Active risk/Tracking error/Tracking risk
Standard deviation of active return
Formula:
√[ (Rportfolio - Rbenchmark) ÷ (n - 1) ]
Information Ratio
Active return per unit of active risk
Formula: (average return on portfolios - average return on benchmarks)
OR
(Rportfolio - Rbenchmark) ÷ σ(Rportfolio - Rbenchmark)
- The higher the IR, the more active return the manager earned per unit of active risk.
Sources of active risk
Active risk squared = Active factor risk + active specific risk
Active factor risk
Active risk attributable to factor tilts
Active specific risk
Active risk attributable to stock selection
Formula: Σ(Weight of portfolio - weight of benchmark)^2 * active risk squared
Example: Factor return
Fund A generated a return of 11.2% over the past 12 months, while the benchmark portfolio returned 11.8%. Suppose we are provided a fundamental factor model with two factors as given in the following:
Factor: P/E
Portfolio beta: 1.1
Benchmark beta: 1
Factor risk premium: -5%
Factor: Size
Portfolio beta: 0.69
Benchmark beta: 1.02
Factor risk premium: 2%
(1) Attribute the cause of the difference in returns.
(2) Describe the manager’s apparent skill in factor bets as well as in security selection.
(1)
P/E return = (1.1 - 1) * -5% = -0.5%
Size return = (0.69 - 1.02) * 2 = -0.66%
-0.5% + -0.66% = -1.16%
Total return = 11.2% - 11.8% = -0.6%
Return from factor tilts = -1.16%
Return from stock selection = -0.6% = -1.16% + x = 0.56%
(2)
The active manager’s regrettable factor bets resulted in a return of –1.16% relative to the benchmark. However, the manager’s superior security selection return of +0.56% resulted in a total active return of –0.60% relative to the benchmark.
Example: Active Risk
Investor A is analyzing the performance of three actively managed mutual funds using a two-factor model. The results of his risk decomposition are shown in the following table:
Fund A, B, C (respectively)
Size factor = 6.25, 3.20, 17.85
Style factor = 12.22, 0.80, 0.11
Total factor = 18.47, 4.00, 17.96
Active specific risk = 3.22, 12.22, 19.7
Active risk squared = 21.69, 16.22, 37.66
(1) Which fund has the highest level of active risk?
(2) Which fund has the highest style factor as a % of active risk?
(3) Which fund has the highest size factor as a % of active risk?
(4) Which fund has the lowest level of active specific risk as a % of active risk?
(1)
√21.69 = 4.66
√16.22 = 4.03
√37.66 = 6.14
(2)
12.22 ÷ 21.69 = 56%
0.80 ÷ 16.22 = 4.9%
0.11 ÷ 37.66 = 0.29%
(3)
6.25 ÷ 21.69 = 28.8%
3.20 ÷ 16.22 = 19.7%
17.85 ÷ 37.66 = 47.4%
(4)
3.22 ÷ 21.69 = 14.85%
12.22 ÷ 16.22 = 75.34%
19.7 ÷ 37.66 = 52.31%
Tracking portfolios
Portfolios that attempt to have the same set of risk exposures as a benchmark index.
Ex: A PM that tries to create a portfolio w/ the same risk exposures as the S&P.
- Multifactor models can be used to determine the risk exposures
Factor portfolio
A portfolio that has been constructed to where there is a sensitivity of 1 (100%) to one risk factor and sensitivities of 0 for all other factors.
Ex: PM believes that GDP growth will be stronger than expected but wants to hedge against all other factors.
- Factor portfolios are particularly useful for speculation or hedging purposes.
- Multifactor models are used to predict alpha generated from active bets on certain factors.
Rules-based/Algorithmic active management
Essentially a mean reversion model. This strategy uses rules to make factor tilts to where if something outperforms in one period of time it will regress in the next.
- This is a low cost strategy.
Carhart Model
A multifactor model that builds on the 3-part Fama and French model to include market risk, size, value, and momentum as factors.
Formula: Er = Rf + βRMRF + βSMB + βHML + βWML
- RMRF = Return on value-weighted equity index
- SMB = avg. return on small cap stocks - avg. return on large cap stocks
- HML = avg. return on high book-to-market stocks - avg. return on low book-to-market stocks
- WML = avg. returns on past winners - avg. returns on past losers
Value at risk (VaR)
Measures downside risk of a portfolio. There are 3 components to VaR:
1. the loss size
2. the probability of a loss >= the specified loss size
3. the time frame.
Ex: There is a 5% probability that the company will experience a loss of $25k or more in any given month = monthly VaR of $25k.
- VaR can also be expressed in percentage terms so that for a portfolio, we could state that the 5% monthly VaR is 3%, meaning that 5% of the time the monthly portfolio value will fall by at least 3%.
- We can also state VaR as a confidence level: we are 95% (i.e., 100% – 5%) confident that the portfolio will experience a loss of no more than 3%.
Selections that must be made when estimating VaR
We must either choose the size or probability of the loss.
If we choose the size of the loss, we will estimate the probability of losses of that size or larger.
If we choose the probability of the loss, we will estimate the minimum size of the losses that will occur w/ that probability.
3 ways to estimate VaR:
- Parametric/Variance-covariance
- Historical simulation
- Monte carlo simulation
Parametric/Variance-covariance method to estimating VaR
The first step w/ any of the 3 approaches to estimating VaR is to identify the relevant risk factors (ex: market risk, currency risk, etc.)
W/ the parametric approach, each risk factor is assigned a distribution, often assumed to be normal to avoid skewness and kurtosis. Since a normal distribution can be completely described by its variance, these are all we need w/ this method. Mean and variance is usually found through a lookback period where we take the avg. over history. We could also estimate future values.
Then, we can estimate VAR by choosing a probability. Ex: A 5% VaR will be 1.65 standard deviations away from the mean.
- In cases where normality cannot be assumed, the parametric approach has limited usefulness.
- An assumption of a normal distribution is invalid if options are in the portfolio.
Example: Estimating VaR using the parametric approach given:
Security A
σ = 0.0158
μ = 0.0004
Security B
σ = 0.0112
μ = 0.0003
Covariance = 0.000106
Use this info to estimate the 5% annual VaR for a portfolio that is 60% invested in security A and 40% invested in security B and has a value of $10mm.
Weighted mean = 0.6(0.0004) + 0.4(0.0003) = 0.00036
Variance of the portfolio = (wa^2 * σa^2) + (wb^2 * σb^2) + (2 * wa * wb * covariance of a & b) = (0.6)^2(0.0158)^2 + (0.4)^2(0.0112)^2 + (2 * 0.6 * 0.4 * 0.000106) = 0.000161
σ of portfolio = √0.000161 = 0.012682
1.65 * 0.012682 = 0.020925
0.00036 - 0.020925 = -0.0206
-0.0206 * $10mm = -$206k
VaR = There is a 5% chance on any given day the portfolio will lose $206k in value.
There are 250 trading days in the year:
0.00036 * 250 = 0.09
√250 * 1.65 * 0.012682 = 0.330858
0.09 - 0.330858 = -0.240858
$10mm * -0.240858 = -$2,409,000
VaR = There is a 5% chance in any given year the portfolio will lose $2.409mm in value.
We use √250 because the daily returns are independent distributed.
Variance of two asset portfolio calculation
wa^2σa^2 + wb^2σb^2 + (2 * wa * wb * covariance of a & b)
Historical simulation method of estimating VaR
This method is based on the actual periodic changes in risk factors over a lookback period.
Ex: For a period of 100 days, the 5% daily VaR is just the observation below the 5 biggest losses during that period.
- The VaR estimate under the historical simulation approach is the smallest of the largest x% losses
Pros and cons of historical simulation method
Pros: No need to assume a distribution. This method can be used to estimate the VaR for portfolios that include options.
Cons: If the lookback period has abnormal observations, this will skew the VaR.
Monte Carlo simulation method to estimating VaR
This method is based on an assumed probability distribution of the correlations for each risk factor. Then, software generates random values for each risk factor and computes periodic returns based on these values. Then, we will use the generated outcomes and use the same steps as the historical simulation method.
- If asset returns are correlated, this method will assume a multivariate normal distribution.
- Rolling-window backtesting (not Monte Carlo simulation) is a proxy for actual investing.
Advantages of VaR
- Simple and easy concept
- Risk of different portfolios, asset classes, or trading operations can be compared to known relative risk.
- VaR can be used for performance evaluation.
- Can be a good tool when determing asset allocation of a portfolio
- Regulators accept VaR as a measure of risk.
- Reliability of VaR can be verified by backtesting.
Disadvantages of VaR
- Estimation of VaR requires many sensitive assumptions
- The assumption of normality leads to underestimates of downside risk
- VaRs that do not take into account liquidity risks when an asset price falls will understate downside risk.
- VaR will not capture every risk factor.
- VaR does not consider risk-return trade offs.
Conditional VaR (CVaR)
The expected loss, given that the loss is >= the VaR. It’s the expected loss if that worst-case threshold is ever crossed.
W/ the historical simulation or monte carlo methods, we just take the average of all observations that are worse than the VaR. The only way to do this w/ the parametric method is mathematically complex.
Incremental VaR (IVaR)
The change in VaR from a change in the portfolio allocation to a security. It’s the amount of uncertainty added to or subtracted from a portfolio by purchasing or selling an investment.
IVaR will tell you that the expected loss that will happen x% of the time will increase/decrease by the IVaR.
Marginal VaR (MVaR)
The additional amount of risk that a new investment position adds to a firm or portfolio.
MVaR is the slope of a curve that plots VaR as a function of a security’s weight in the portfolio. IVaR and MVaR are similar; however, MVaR explains the sensitivity of VaR to an x% change in the portfolio’s weight.
Relative VaR/Ex-ante tracking VaR
Measures the VaR of the difference between the return on a portfolio and the return on the benchmark portfolio.
Ex: A 5% monthly VaR implies that 5% of the time, the portfolio’s relative underperformance will be x%.