CFA L2 Corporate Issuers Flashcards
Types of dividends
- Cash dividends
- Extra/special/irregular dividends
- Liquidating dividend
- Stock dividend
- Stock split
Cash dividend
Periodic dividend payments made in cash on the ex-dividend date.
- Firms generally want stable dividends.
- U.S. firms pay out quarterly, while Euro and Asian companies pay out semiannually and annually, respectively.
- Cash dividends reduce cash assets and equity. This results in a lower quick and current ratio and higher leverage (D/E ratio).
Extra/special/irregular dividend
A cash dividend supplementing a regular dividends, or dividends from a firm that typically does not pay out dividends.
- These may be paid if a firm has a particularly profitable year but does not want to make dividending a regular occurrence.
Liquidating dividend
Dividends paid by a firm when the whole firm or part of the firm is sold, or when dividends in excess of cumulative RE are paid. A liquidating dividend is a RETURN OF CAPITAL versus a return on capital.
Stock dividend
A non-cash dividend in the form of additional shares. A stock dividend will provide equity holders more shares and the cost per share will be lower. This DOES NOT change proportionate ownership since every equity holder is given the same percentage stock dividend.
- Shareholders are usually not taxed on stock dividends.
- Does not affect a firm’s capital structure. No change in ratios.
Stock dividend example:
Imagine a firm earning $100,000 annually has 100,000 shares outstanding w/ a price per share of $10. EPS thus equals ($100,000 ÷ 100,000) = $1. P/E = $10 ÷ $1 = 10. Suppose the firm declares a 10% stock dividend, what are the new shares outstanding and EPS? What is the new value of the shareholders stocks?
Shares outstanding = 100,000 * (1.1) = 110,000
EPS= ($100,000 ÷ 110,000) = 0.9091
Stock price per share= 0.9091 * 10 (original PE) = $9.09
Total value of shares= $999,900 (virtually identical)
Benefits of stock dividends
- Makes long-term investing more desirable.
- May reduce COE.
- Increases liquidity.
- Decreases stock price.
True or false: Firms that pay the same regular cash dividend per share following a stock dividend have effectively decreased their cash dividend?
False, they have effectively increased it.
Stock split
When a company increases the # of its shares to boost the stock’s liquidity by lowering its price per share. The number of shares outstanding increases by some multiple.
- 2-for-1 splits and 3-for-1 splits are the most common.
- A 2-for-1 split is equal to a 100% stock dividend.
- Does not affect a firm’s capital structure. No change in ratios.
Reverse stock split
Much less common than regular stock splits. This is where a firm decreases its # of shares outstanding to increase the price per share. Typically, this is done to attract institutional investors and mutual funds.
Dividend reinvestment plans (DRP)
Offered by some companies that reinvest dividends on behalf of the shareholders that opt out of receiving cash dividends. So essentially the shareholders is just buying more shares instead of taking the dividend. DRPs can be open market where the shares are bought from the capital markets or DRPs can be newly issued stock.
3 theories of dividend policy
- Dividend irrelevance
- Dividend preference theory/bird-in-hand argument for dividend policy
- Tax aversion
Dividend irrelevance
Based on the M&M assumptions that maintain that dividend policy has no effect on the price of a firm’s stock or cost of capital. This based on M&M’s homemade dividend concept where if a dividend is too big, the shareholder can reinvest part or all of the dividend and if the dividend is too small, they can sell part or all of their stock to make up for it. The conclusion here is that investors don’t care about the dividend policy since they can create their own.
- This theory only holds in a perfect world with no taxes, brokerage costs, and infinitely divisible shares.
- MM discussion pertains to the firm’s total payout policy versus just the dividend policy.
Dividend preference theory/bird-in-hand argument for dividend policy
This is based on theory from Myron Gordon and John Lintner. These two argue that since ROE decreases as dividend payouts increase, investors are less certain of receiving future capital gains since there is less RE. The main argument here is that investors place more importance on receiving a certain $ of dividends than $ of capital gains. The argument is based on the fact that when measuring total return, dividend yield has less risk than the growth component. Recall, the Gordon growth model = [ D ÷ (r - g) ].
- Higher dividends lead to higher stock prices.
Tax aversion theory
This theory states that since dividend taxes are higher than capital gains taxes, shareholders will prefer to not receive dividends and instead see NI reinvested through RE. The result of this is that smaller dividends result in higher stock price and lower COE. In 2003, tax laws in America changed to where dividends and long-term capital gains are now taxes at 15%. This makes this theory untrue in the U.S.
Info Asymmetry
Differences in info available to a company’s board/mgmt (insiders) and the investors (outsiders).
True or false: A dividend initiation is always a positive signal to the markets?
False, a dividend intitiation is ambiguous. It could mean that a company is optimistic about the future and wants to share its wealth- a positive signal. Or it could mean that a company has a lack of profitable reinvestment opportunities- a negative signal.
True or false: A dividend omission (decrease) is usually a negative signal to the markets?
True.
- In rare cases it may be a positive sign as mgmt may believe that profitable reinvestment opportunities are available.
True or false: A dividend increase is usually a negative signal to the markets?
False, positive.
Agency costs between shareholders and managers
The cost of inefficiencies due to the divergence of interests between mgmt and stockholders (ex: mgmt may have an incentive to overinvest leading to poor investments). One way to reduce agency costs is to increase the payout of free CFs as dividends.
Agency costs between shareholders and bondholders
The cost of inefficiencies due to the divergence of interests between bondholders and stockholders. One way to reduce these agency costs is via provisions in the bond indenture that can include restrictions on dividends, maintenance of certain b/s ratios, etc.
Factors that affect dividend policy:
- Investment opportunities
- Expected volatility of future earnings: when earnings are volatile, firms are reluctant to change dividends.
- Financial flexibility: Excess cash on hand and a desire to maintain financial flexibility may lead a firm to stock repurchases instead of dividends.
- Tax considerations
- Flotation costs: the higher the flotation costs (costs related to raising new equity (ex: payment of investment bankers) the lower the dividend payout.
- Contractual and legal restrictions
Reasons why a lower tax rate for dividends does not necessarily mean firms will raise their dividend payouts?
Taxes on dividends are paid when the dividend is received, whereas taxes on capital gains are only paid when the shares are sold. Tax-exempt institutions will be indifferent.
- In the case of a shareholder’s death, capital gains tax may not have to be paid.
Common contractual and legal restrictions related to dividends:
- The impairment of capital rule: in some countries this is a legal requirement where dividends cannot exceed RE
- Debt covenants: These protect bondholders and dictate things a company can or cannot do.
Double-taxation system
How dividends are taxed in the U.S. Earnings are taxed regardless of whether dividends are paid and then if dividends are paid they are taxed separately.
Calculation: Corporate tax rate + (1 - corporate tax rate) * (individual tax rate)
Effective tax rate on dividend example:
A U.S. company’s earning are $300 and the corporate tax rate is 35%. Assume the dividend payouts comprise 100% of earnings. What is the effective tax rate on # of corporate earnings paid out as dividends assuming a 15% tax rate on dividend income.
Effective tax rate = 0.35 + ( 1 - 0.35) * (0.15) = 44.75%
Split-rate corporate tax system
Taxes earnings distributed as dividends at a lower rate than earnings that are retained in order to offset the double tax rate applied to dividends.
Calculation: Corporate tax rate applicable to dividends + [ (1 - corporate tax rate applicable to dividends) * individual tax rate ]
Split-rate corporate tax system example:A firm’s earnings are $300 and the corporate tax rate on RE is 35%, whereas the corporate tax rate on dividends is 20%. Assuming that the company pays out 50% of its earnings as dividends and the individual tax rate for dividends is 30%, what is the effective tax rate?
Effective tax rate = .20 + [ (1 - .20) * .30 ] = 44%
Imputation tax system
Taxes are paid at the corporate level but attributed to the shareholder. Then, the shareholders deduct their portion of the taxes paid by the firm from their tax return. Under the imputation system, the effective tax rate on the dividend is just the shareholder’s tax rate. If the shareholder’s tax bracket is lower than the company rate, the shareholder would receive a tax credit equal to the difference between the two rates. Oppositely, if it’s higher than the company rate, the shareholder would pay the difference.
Imputation tax system example:
A shareholder owns 100 shares of a stock in a corporation that makes $1 per share in pretax income. The corporation pays out all its income as dividends. The shareholder has a 20% individual tax bracket whereas the firm has a 30% tax rate. What is the effective tax rate for the shareholder?
$1 * 100 shares = $100 in pretax income.
$100 * (1 - .30) = $70= NI.
Shareholder tax due = $100 * (.20) = $20.
Since, shareholder tax < corporate tax, the shareholder will receive a tax credit worth ($30 - $20) = $10.
Effective tax rate on dividends = 20/100 = 20%.
Stable dividend policy
This dividend policy focuses on consistent dividend payouts, even if earnings are volatile year-to-year. Companies may use a target payout adjustment model in order to gradually increase their dividend towards the target dividend payout ratio.
How to estimate future dividends if the current payout ratio is below the target payout ratio?
Expected increase in dividends = [ [ (expected earnings * target payout ratio) - previous dividend ] * adjustment factor ] + previous dividend
Adjustment factor = 1 ÷ (# of years over which the adjustment in dividends will take place)
Constant dividend payout ratio policy
A dividend policy where a % of total earnings are paid out as dividends. This practice is seldom used in reality.
What are the three broad trends in corporate payout policies?
- Globally, in developed markets, the proportion of firms paying cash dividends has trended downward over the long-run.
- The # of firms making stock repurchases has risen drastically in the U.S. since 1980, Europe since the 1990s, and Asia since 2010.
- Lower proportion of U.S. companies pay cash dividends as opposed to European companies.
Fourth methods used for stock buybacks:
- Open market transactions: most flexible approach
- Fixed-price tender offer.
- Dutch auction
- Repurchase by direct negotiation.
Stock buybacks through open market transactions
This approach allows a firm to buy back shares in the open market at the most favorable terms (when the price is attractive).
Stock buybacks through fixed-price tender offer
An approach where a firm informs all of their shareholders that it intends to buys a predetermined # of shares at a certain price, typically at a premium over the shares’ market value.
- This approach is quicker than the open market transactions approach but it does not give the firm the flexibility (the ability to buyback shares at the most opportune time).
Stock buybacks through Dutch auction
An approach where a firm specifies a range of prices to the market it is willing to buy back its shares at. The shares that are priced the lowest will be sold first (to the shareholder who was willing to accept the lowest of the range). The lower the price the shareholder is willing to receive, the more likely the order will be executed. This approach is cheaper than fixed price tender but slower.
Stock buybacks through repurchase by direct negotiation
This approach involves buying back shares from a major shareholder, typically at a premium over the shares’ fair value. This method is often used in a greenmail scenario where a shareholder is paid a premium to leave the company. Sometimes, the shares can be bought back at a discount if the shareholder needs cash quickly.
How do share repurchases affect EPS?
When repurchases are financed with the firm’s cash, cash in the firm’s b/s will be low and therefore equity will be lower. This will in turn increase leverage ratios. After the repurchase, EPS will likely increase because outstanding shares will decrease. If earnings yield (EPS ÷ stock price) > after-tax opportunity cost of cash, EPS would increase.
- When repurchases are financed with debt, the reduction in net income from the cost of borrowed funds must also be factored in to determine the impact on EPS. If earnings yield (EPS ÷ stock price) > after-tax opportunity cost of debt, EPS would increase.
Shares repurchase effect on EPS example:
Firm A has 10,000,000 shares outstanding w/ a NI of $50,000,000. The company repurchases 2,000,000 shares at a premium of 25% over the current market price of $40. What is the effect on EPS if cash is used and if debt w/ a 3% interest rate is used?
If cash:
Current EPS = ($50,000,000 ÷ 10,000,000) = $5
Repurchase price = $40 * (1.25) = $50
Total cost of repurchase = $50 * 2,000,000 = $100,000,000
New EPS = $50,000,000 ÷ (10,000,000 - 2,000,000) = $6.25
If debt:
After-tax cost-of-funds = $100,000,000 * .03 = $3,000,000
New earnings = $50,000,000 - $3,000,000 = $47,000,000
New EPS = $47,000,000 ÷ (10,000,000 - 2,000,000) = 5.875
What are the five common rationales for share repurchases vs dividends?
- Potential tax advantages: When tax rate on capital gains < tax rate on dividend income, share repurchases have an advantage.
- Share price support/signaling: Firms buying back their own shares can signal to the market that the firm thinks its own stock is currently a good investment.
- Added flexibility: Share repurchases can supplement dividends.
- Offsetting dilution from employee stock options: Repurchases offset EPS dilution that results from the exercise of employee stock options.
- Increasing financial leverage: When funded by new debt, share repurchases increase leverage.
How to calculate MVE after a dividend/repurchase
[ (Shares outstanding prior to transaction * Pre-dividend MV of share) - share buyback total ] ÷ Shares outstanding after transaction
Impact of share repurchase and cash dividend of equal amounts example:
Firm A has 20,000,000 shares outstanding with a MV of $50 per share. The firm made $100,000,000. The firm is comparing paying a cash dividend of $1.50 per share to its shareholders to doing a stock buyback of $30,000,000 at $50 per share. Which method is better for shareholders? Assume tax treatments are the same.
Dividend: After the dividends are paid out on the ex-dividend date, a shareholder of a single share would have $1.50 in cash and [ (20,000,000 * $50) - $30,000,000 ] ÷ 20,000,000 = $48.50 per share, which results in total wealth of $50.
Share repurchase: Firm A could repurchase $30,000,000 ÷ $50 = 600,000 shares. MVE of share after repurchase = [ (200,000,000 * $50) - $30,000,000 ] ÷ (20,000,000 - 600,000) = $50
How to calculate EPS after share buyback?
(Total earnings - after-tax cost of funds) ÷ total shares outstanding after buyback
After-tax cost of funds= shares outstanding after buyback * share price at the time of buyback * after-tax cost of borrowing
Share repurchase when the after-tax cost of debt < earnings yield example:
Firm A borrows $30,000,000 to repurchase shares. Share price and shares outstanding at the time of the buyback are $50 and 20,000,000. EPS before buyback is $5. Earnings yield = $5 ÷ $50 = 10%. After-tax cost of borrowing= 8%. Planned buyback= 600,000 shares. What is the EPS after the buyback?
Total earnings = $5 * 20,000,000 = $100,000,000($100,000,000 - (600,000 * $50 * .08) ) ÷ (20,000,000 - 600,000) = $5.03= EPS after buyback
Since the after-tax cost of borrowing (8%) < earnings yield, the share buyback will increase EPS.
Dividend safety
The metric used to evaluate the probability of dividends continuing at the current rate for a company.
Dividend payout ratio
A type of dividend safety metric.
Calculation: Dividends ÷ NI
- Higher ratio indicates a higher probability of a dividend cut.
- Compare a firm’s ratio w/ the industry average.
Dividend coverage ratio
A type of dividend safety metric.
Calculation: NI ÷ dividends
- Higher ratio= better
- Lower ratio indicates a lower probability of dividend sustainability.
- Compare a firm’s ratio w/ the industry average.
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
The CF available for distribution to stockholders after WC and fixed capital needs are accounted for. FCFE is a measure of equity capital usage.
Calculation: CFO - CAPEX + net debt
FCFE Coverage ratio
FCFE ÷ (dividends + share repurchases)
- A ratio significantly < 1 is considered unsustainable. In this situation, a firm is drawing down its cash reserves for dividends and repurchases.
True or false: If the price paid for repurchase < pre-purchase BV per share, BV per share will decline?
False, it will increase
BV per share calculation
Total stockholders equity ÷ total shares outstanding
What has led to global variations in ownership structures?
Global differences in legal, social, political, and economic factors.
Structures of corporate ownership
- Concentrated
- Dispersed
- Hybrid
Concentrated corporate ownership structure
The most common form of corporate ownership. This is where a single shareholder or group of shareholders have control over the corporation.
Dispersed corporate ownership structure
Where the shareholders are numerous and none have control.
True or false: Percentage of ownership will tell an analyst which shareholders have control?
False, not necessarily.
Vertical ownership/pyramid ownership
An arrangement where a shareholder or group of shareholders have a controlling interest in holding companies, which in turn could have controlling interests in subsidiaries. Thereby, the shareholder or group of shareholders has control over several companies.
Horizontal ownership
An arrangement where firms w/ common suppliers or customers cross-hold each other’s shares.
Cross holding
A situation where one publicly-traded company holds a significant number of shares of another publicly-traded company
Dual-class shares
One class of shareholders has fewer voting rights, while another class has superior voting rights.