CDS Restorative Flashcards
Treatment options for missing teeth
Leave space
Replace the teeth (denture, implant, bridge)
Close space through orthodontics
Why treat tooth loss? (4)
Aesthetics
Function - chewing
Speech
Health of other teeth (tilting, overeruption etc.)
Why is overeruption problematic?
The root surface becomes exposed, which is more sensitive and more susceptible to caries
Dental implants
False titanium roots surgically screwed into alveolar bone, left to heal then restored on top with bridge/crown
What is a bridge?
A prosthesis which replaces missing tooth or teeth and is attached to one or more natural teeth (or implants)
Can also be called a fixed partial denture
Limitation of bridgework compared with dentures
Bridgework does not usually replace soft tissue and bone, can include a little false gingivae
Types of bridgework
Adhesive
Conventional
Adhesive vs conventional bridgework
Adhesive - held on with wings on the palatal surface of teeth
Conventional - retained using crowns
Indications for bridgework
Function and stability
Appearance
Speech
Psychological - those reluctant to have removeable prostheses
Systemic disease - epilepsy
Cooperative patient - good OH, no active disease
Local indications for bridgework
Big teeth
Heavily restored teeth (for conventional)
Favourable abutment angulations
Favourable occlusion - not too heavy
Contraindications for bridgework
Uncooperative pt
Medical history of allergy to materials used
Poor OH
High caries rate
Periodontal disease
Large pulps (for conventional)
Local contraindications for bridgework
High possibility of future tooth loss within the arch
Poor prognosis of abutment teeth
Length of span too big
Ridge form and tissue loss
Tilting and rotation of teeth
Degree of restoration - how much tooth will be left after preparation
PA status
Bone loss
Abutment
A tooth which serves as an attachment for a bridge
Pontic
Artificial tooth which is suspended from the abutment teeth/tooth
Retainers (in bridgework)
The extracoronal and intracoronal restorations that are connected to the pontic and cemented to the prepared abutment teeth
What are connectors in bridgework?
Component which connects the pontic to retainers
Edentulous span
Space between the natural teeth that is to be filled by a bridge or partial denture
Saddle
Area of the edentulous ridge over which the pontic will lie
Pier
Abutment teeth which stand in between and support two pontics, each pontic being attached to a further abutment tooth
What is a unit in a bridge?
A retainer, pontic or a pier
Fixed-fixed bridge
Has a retainer at either side of the pontic (can be adhesive or conventional), joined by rigid connectors
Cantilever bridge
Retainer on one side of the pontic only (adhesive or conventional)
Names for resin bonded bridgework
Adhesive bridgework
Resin retained bridgework
Minimal preparation bridgework
Maryland bridgework
Resin bonded fixed partial denture
Metal used for adhesive bridgework wings
Cobalt chrome, nickel or chromium
Advantages of resin bonded bridgework
Minimal or no preparation
No anaesthetic needed
Less costly
Less clinical time
Can be used as provisional restorations (eg in children with hypodontia, as implants can’t be provided until finished growing)
If they fail, usually less destructive than alternatives
Disadvantages of resin bonded bridgework 6
Rigorous clinical technique, due to being resin retained, moisture control very important
Metal shine through
Chipping porcelain
Can debond
Occlusal interferences
No trial period possible
Indications for resin bonded bridgework
Young teeth (less destructive)
Good enamel quality - for bonding
Large abutment teeth surface area
Minimal occlusal load
Good for single tooth replacement
Simplify partial denture design
Contraindications for resin bonded bridgework
Insufficient or poor quality enamel
Long spans
Excess soft or hard tissue loss
Heavy occlusal contacts
Bruxists
Poorly aligned, tilted or spaced teeth
Contact sports?
Treatment planning for resin bonded bridgework
History - establish habits eg bruxism
Examination - clinical, dynamic occlusal relationships should be examined as well as stationary, periodontal health, radiographic examination
Study models - mounted on semi adjustable articulator and facebow registration, consider diagnostic wax up
Consider abutment teeth, occlusion and aesthetics
Patient cooperation and OH are important
Occlusal considerations for resin bonded bridgework
Bruxists, some don’t know - look for signs of attrition
Consider opposing dentition, contact points, over-eruption
Look at dynamic and stationary occlusal relationship clinically and on mounted study models
Direct resin bonded bridgework
Done chairside, there and then
Very useful in emergency situations, if a tooth requires immediate extraction or has been lost traumatically
Can be done using the patient’s tooth, acrylic denture pontic, polycarbonate crown or cellulose matrix filled with composite
How to treat a non restorable root fracture, with direct resin bonded bridgework
Extract tooth
Cut root off crown
Remove pulp and fill hole with composite
Etch contact points to adjacent teeth
Bond and put in situ
Apply small amounts of composite to the contact points
TEMPORARY solution until pt can have implant, denture or indirect bridgework
What is the difference between direct and indirect bridgework?
Direct - done chairside, there and then
Indirect - prostheses made in lab, requires impressions to be taken and lab work
Can require no, minimal or heavy preparation
Limitations of resin bonded bridgework
Need generous coverage on the palatal or lingual surface of abutment teeth - greater surface area of enamel covered = greater bond strength
Need good quality enamel for good bond
Should be kept supragingival, ideally 0.5mm
Care must be taken with coverage at incisal edge considering enamel translucency and shine through
Most common type of resin bonded bridge design anteriorly
Generally cantilever
Most common type of resin bonded bridge design posteriorly
Fixed-fixed
What are the issues with fixed-fixed resin bonded bridges in the anterior region?
One of the wings will often debond, ultimately resulting in caries underneath
Divergent guidance pathways - occlusal forces are directed down each anterior tooth in a different way due to the shape of the anterior arch
What are the considerations of existing restorations in abutment teeth for resin bonded bridgework?
Ideally sound enamel is needed to bond to
Bonding to composite can be ok, however consider replacing with newer composite or roughening the old one with slow speed
Amalgam will cause a compromised bond to chemically cured composite cement, consider replacing
Minimal preparation for cantilever resin bonded bridgework
Occlusal contact reduction (slight) especially if very heavy contact on abutment tooth
Cingulum undercut removal only, helps with path of insertion
Chamfer margin 0.5mm supragingivally
Mechanical retention of resin bonded bridgework
Rest seats/cingulum rests
Proximal grooves
Supra-gingival chamfer finish line ~0.5mm
Heavier preparation for cantilever design resin bonded bridgework
0.5mm reduction of entire surface
Cingulum rest
+/- proximal grooves
Chamfer margin (0.5mm supragingival)
Thickness of bridgework metal retainer wing
~0.7mm
Most likely time frame for failure of resin bonded bridgework
First 2 years, 5 year survival and 10 year survival stats very similar
Superfloss
Useful tool for cleaning under bridge pontics
Thinner and thicker parts
What should be used to cement resin retained bridgework?
Dual cure composite resin luting cement
Example Panavia21
Ideal size relationship between pontic and abutment tooth
Ideally pontic is smaller than abutment tooth
Cementation of resin bonded bridgework
Try in by holding with finger
Can request locating cleat on retainer, to check appearance and occlusion
Small bit of composite can be used but then requires cleaned off the surface, may require sandblasting again
Sandblasting
Used on fit surface of bridge retainer - cobalt chrome or nickel-chromium alloy has aluminium oxide particles of 50 micron thickness blasted at the surface
Roughens surface for increased bond strength
What kind of preparation is used for posterior resin bonded bridgework?
Often none
When required, occlusal rests ~2mm deep, 180 wraparound with chamfer finish line 0.5mm supragingivally, and occasionally proximal grooves
Temporisation for resin bonded bridgework
Direct bridgework
RPD
Essex retainer
If prep remains within enamel, no real need for temporary, sensitive toothpaste/duraphat or a thin layer of dentine bonding agent can help with sensitivity
When is it appropriate to use a longer span bridge such as 3-3 in the anterior region?
Not much occlusal contact such as class II incisor relationship
Advantages of conventional fixed-fixed bridgework
Robust design
Maximum retention and strength
Abutment teeth splinted together - good in cases of stable perio where still mobile
Can use longer spans
Lab construction is straightforward
Disadvantages of fixed-fixed conventional bridge designs
Preparation can be difficult - common path of insertion required
Removal of tooth tissue causes danger to pulp
If preparation is over tapered, retention is reduced
Problems when alignment of abutment teeth not parallel
Ideal taper for fixed-fixed conventional bridgework preparation
5-7 degrees
Cantilever conventional bridge advantages
More conservative tooth prep than fixed-fixed
Lab construction straightforward
No need to ensure multiple tooth preparations are parallel
Cantilever conventional bridgework design disadvantages
Only for short span (one tooth)
Rigid to avoid distortion - more prone to fracture
Mesial cantilever preferred (pontic more anterior)
What is the purpose of a fixed moveable bridge?
Solution for fixed-fixed designs where the abutment teeth are not aligned parallel to each other
What is a fixed moveable bridge?
Bridge comes in two components, pontic and one retainer with a dovetail in one path of insertion, then another crown for the other abutment tooth, with a slot. The two components have different paths of insertion but slot together.
Advantages of fixed-moveable bridges
Preparations don’t require common path of insertion, allowing more conservative tooth preparation
Each preparation is designed to be retentive independent of each other
Allows minor tooth movement
Can be cemented in two parts
Disadvantages of fixed moveable bridges
Limits length of span
Lab construction more complicated, can take longer
Possible difficulty in cleaning beneath moveable joint, as they are slotted not cemented together
Cant construct provisional bridge, could maybe do two provisional crowns on abutments and an essex retainer
Spring cantilever bridge
One pontic added to the end of a metal arm that runs across the palate to a rigid connector on the palatal side of a retainer. This was designed to try to conserve anterior tooth tissue. No longer used.
Advantages of spring cantilever bridge
Useful if spacing between upper anteriors present, where adjacent teeth are unrestored, and a posterior tooth would provide a suitable abutment, i.e. already has a crown or large restoration
Disadvantages of spring cantilever bridge
Can only be used to replace upper incisors
Difficult to clean beneath palatal connector
May irritate palatal mucosa
Difficult to control movement of pontic due to springiness of metal arm and displacement of palatal soft tissues
Abutment evaluation
Must be able to withstand the forces previously directed to the missing teeth
Supporting tissues should be healthy and free of inflammation
Crown to root ratio - length of tooth coronal to alveolar crest to length of rooth embedded in bone - optimum 2:3, minimum 1:1
Alternatives to bridges
Leave space
Denture
Implants
Why is it important to plan for retrievability when tx planning bridges?
Every restoration fails eventually
Clinical examination in bridge tx planning
History - presenting complaint, MH, SH, PDH
Clinical exam intra and extra oral - soft tissue, perio, caries, risk assessment, occlusion, parafunction
Abutment evaluation - sensibility testing, remaining tooth structure, radiographs
Important considerations in abutment evaluation
Sensibility testing
Remaining tooth structure
Radiographs
Healthy pulp or good RCT
PA health
Perio
Occlusal examination for bridgework tx planning
Examine intraorally and using study casts - facebow mounted on a semi adjustable articulator
Incisal classification, canine guidance vs group function
Consider overerupted opposing teeth
Parafunction?
Will bridge interfere with occlusion?
Considerations of radiographs of abutment teeth
Root configuration
Angulation/rotation of abutment
Periodontal health
Intra-oral exam considerations of abutment teeth
Surface area for bonding and quality of enamel
Risk of pulpal damage
Quality of endodontics - consider re-RCT
Remaining tooth structure - is there enough? Consider build up
Core - remove and rebuild
Bridge design process
Select abutment teeth - judge longevity of adjacent teeth
Select retainer - no prep, minimal prep, regular prep for RBB or full crown prep for conventional
Select pontic and connector
Plan the occlusion
Prescribe material
Pontic function
Restore appearance
Stabilise occlusion
Improve masticatory function
Factors influencing cleansability of pontic
Should always be smooth with highly polished or glazed surface
Surface should not harbour join of metal and porcelain
Embrasure space smooth and cleansable
Why is span relevant to thickness of bridge?
Longer the span, greater the thickness required to withstand occlusal forces
Occlusal surfaces of pontic
Should resemble those of the tooth it is replacing, narrower if possible to enable cleaning, should have sufficient occlusal contact
Approximal surface of pontic
Connector strength ideally 2x2mm
Embrasure space for cleansability
Wash through pontic
Also called sanitary or hygienic pontic
Makes no contact with soft tissue, functional rather than aesthetic, consider in lower molar area
Dome shaped pontic
Also called torpedo or bullet shaped
Useful in lower incisor, premolar and upper molar regions, acceptable aesthetically if occlusal 2/3 of buccal surface is visible, less suitable if gingival 1/3 is visible
Modified ridge lap
Buccal surface looks as tooth like as possible, but lingual surface is cut away, can have problems with food packing on lingual surface, but is quite easily cleaned
Ridge lap/full saddle
Greatest contact with soft tissue, may cause temporary blanching, good for not allowing food packing
Only for pts with good OH, care should be taken not to displace soft tissue
Ovate pontic
Good for good OH pts, best aesthetics
Gingivae mould into a divot
Sometimes need to initially prescribe an essex retainer with an ovate pontic in it
All metal options as materials for conventional bridgework
Gold - Great function, poor aesthetics
Nickel/cobalt chromium - cheaper
Stainless steel
Zirconia vs lithium disilicate for conventional bridgework materials
Zirconia is very strong, less aesthetic
Lithium disilicate is less strong, more aesthetic
Ceromeric material for conventional bridgework
Porcelain combined with composite
Not used much any more
Belleglass, vectris, targis
Where are metal materials most useful for conventional bridgework and why?
Lower posterior region
Lots of occlusal forces and lower aesthetic demand
Most common material used for conventional bridgework crowns
Metal ceramic
Compromise of strength and aesthetics
Benefit of materials becoming stronger, with regards to conventional bridgework tooth preparation
The preparation no longer needs to be as destructive as it once was
What can implant retained bridges be useful for?
Longer spans
Sequence of providing bridgework BEFORE tooth prep
Mounted study models
Consider diagnostic wax up and custom impression tray
Request lab to construct a vacuum formed stent - allows checking of reduction during tooth prep and allows construction of a temp bridge
Select shade before tooth prep and have lab made stent made or make pre-operative putty impression for provisional bridge
Order of tooth prep
Occlusal/incisal reduction
Separation of teeth
Aim for parallelism of tapered surface of each prep e.g. for 13 12 11
Mesial 11 then mesial 13
Distal 11 then distal 13
Labial 11 then labial 13
How to ensure parallelism of prep in the mouth
Direct vision with one eye closed
Large mouth mirror for posteriors
Use probe like a lab surveyor
What to do if unsure of parallelism of tooth prep
Quick impression
Pour model
Use lab surveyor
Retentive features that can be added to crown prep
Slots or grooves
When to consider adding retentive features to crown prep
Short clinical crown height
Overtapered
Sequence of providing bridgework after tooth prep
Confirm parallelism
Construct provisional bridge if using one
Make impression and occlusal registration
Temporary cement the provisional bridge
Demo cleaning with superfloss
Write/draw lab prescription, including pontic shape, shape, abutment teeth etc
Final bridge cementation
Cement for all metal conventional bridgework
Aquacem (GI luting cement)
RelyX luting (RMGI luting cement)
Cement for metal ceramic conventional bridgework
Aquacem (GI luting cement)
RelyX (RMGI luting cement)
Cement for adhesive resin bonded bridgework
Panavia 21
Cement for all ceramic conventional bridgework
NEXUS kit
What makes Panavia 21 a good cement for resin bonded bridgework?
It is an anaerobic dual cure resin cement with 10-MDP which helps tooth stick to metal
Are mesial or distal cantilevers preferred and why?
Mesial cantilevers preferred
Occlusal forces contact distally first, so if pontic is distal to cantilever retainer, this can mean that it is more likely to debond
When are distal cantilevers considered?
Shortened dental arch
Unopposed
Opposed by denture
Tooth surface loss types
Caries
Trauma
Developmental problems
Tooth wear
Physiological tooth wear
Normal wear associated with normal function and age
20-38um per annum
Pathological tooth wear
When the remaining tooth structure or pulpal health is compromised or the rate of tooth wear is in excess of what would be expected for the pts age
Also considered pathological if the pt experiences a masticatory or aesthetic deficit
Causes of tooth wear
Attrition
Erosion
Abrasion
Abfraction
Attrition
The physiological wearing away of tooth structure as a result of tooth to tooth contact
Which surfaces are affected by attrition?
Occlusal and incisal
Early appearance of attrition
Polished facet on a cusp or slight flattening of incisal edge
Appearance of attrition over time
Reduction in cusp height and flattening of occlusal inclined planes
Shortening of the clinical crown of the incisor and caning teeth
How does attrition affect restorations?
They show the same wear as tooth structure
Is attrition linked to parafunctional habits?
Almost always
Abrasion
The physical wear of tooth substance through an abnormal mechanical process independent of occlusion. It involves a foreign object or substance repeatedly contacting the tooth
Appearance of abrasion
Site and pattern of tooth loss is related to the abrasive element
Most common on labial/buccal surfaces, cervical on canine and premolar teeth
V shaped or rounded lesions
Sharp margin at enamel edges where dentine is worn away preferentially
Can manifest as notching of incisal edges
Most common cause of abrasion of cervical region of premolars and canines
Toothbrushing
Erosion
The loss of tooth surface by a chemical process that does not involve bacterial action
Caused by chronic exposure of teeth to acidic substances - intrinsic or extrinsic
Most common pathological tooth wear type
Erosion
Early stages erosion appearance
Enamel is affected, loss of surface detail, surfaces become flat and smooth
Erosion appearance after progression
Typically bilateral concave lesions without chalky appearance of bacterial acid decalcification
Dentine later exposed
Preferential wear of dentine leads to cupping
Increased translucency of incisal edges, can appear dark
What determines position and severity of erosion lesions?
Source, type and frequency of acid exposure
Effect of erosion on restorations
Amalgam and composite restorations stand proud of the tooth
Abfraction
Loss of hard tissue from eccentric occlusal forces, leading to compressive and tensile stresses at the cervical fulcrum areas of the tooth
Pathological loss of tooth substance at the cervical margin
Cause of abfraction
Biomechanical loading forces result in flexure and failure of the enamel and dentine at a location away from the loading
Disruption of the ordered crystalline structure of the enamel and dentine by cyclic fatigue
Crack in tooth substance cause tooth substance to chip out
Appearance of abfraction
V shaped tooth loss where the tooth is under tension, classically sharp rim at the amelo-cemental junction
Why is it important to determine the cause of tooth wear?
To help with prevention
Do males or females suffer more tooth wear?
Males (70% vs 60%)
History for tooth wear cases
Determine chief complaint - functional, aesthetic, pain?
MH
PDH
SH
How can taking a medical history help with tooth wear cases?
Can often give insight into the aetiology of wear, particularly erosion
- Medications with low pH
- Dry mouth
- Eating disorders
- Heartburn
- Alcoholism
- GORD
- Hiatus hernia
- Rumination
- Pregnancy
- Reflux
Why is social history relevant in tooth wear cases?
Lifestyle stress - bruxism
Occupational details - abrasive habits
Alcohol consumption
Diet analysis
Habits
Sports
Soft tissue indications of bruxism
Buccal keratosis
Lingual scalloping
Smith and Knight wear indices 0
No loss of enamel surface characteristics
Smith and Knight wear indices 1
Loss of enamel surface characteristics
Smith and Knight wear indices 2
Buccal, lingual and occlusal loss of enamel, exposing dentine for less than one third of the surface
Incisal loss of enamel
Minimal dentine exposure
Smith and Knight wear indices 3
Buccal, lingual and occlusal loss of enamel, exposing dentine for more than one third of the surface
Incisal loss of enamel
Substantial dentine exposure
Smith and Knight wear indices 4
Buccal, lingual and occlusal complete loss of enamel, pulpal exposure or exposure of secondary dentine
Incisal pulp exposure or exposure of secondary dentine
Bewe Basic erosive wear examination scores
0 No erosive wear
1 Initial loss of surface texture
2 Distinct defect, hard tissue loss <50% of surface
3 Hard tissue loss >50% of surface area
Risk level of BEWE cumulative scores of all sextants
None - less than or equal to 2
Low - between 3 and 8
Medium - between 9 and 13
High - 14+
Special tests that could be involved in tooth wear tx planning
Sensibility testing
Radiographs
Articulated study models
Intra-oral photos
Salivary analysis
Diagnostic wax up
Diet analysis
Which surface is recorded to give a BEWE score?
Most severely affected surface in a sextant
Immediate treatment phase for tooth wear
Deal with pain - desensitising agents, fluorides, bonding agents, GIC coverage of exposed dentine
Pulp extripation if wear has compromised pulp health
Smooth sharp edges - prevent trauma to soft tissues
Extraction - pain from unrestorable/non-functional tooth
TMJ pain
Initial treatment stage in tooth wear tx planning
Stabilise existing dentition
Deal with caries
Deal with perio
Oro-mucosal
Wear is important but treat the whole pt and whole mouth
Once you have a diagnosis and have identified the primary causative factor, institute a preventative regime, no point treating an ongoing problem
Wear indices examples
BEWE
Smith and Knight
Prevention of abrasion
Remove foreign object involved in causing the wear
Change toothpaste, alter toothbrushing habits, change habits such as nail biting or pen chewing
For toothbrushing abrasion use RMGIC (first choice), GIC, flowable composite or composite restorations placed with no tooth prep
Why are restorations useful for prevention of toothbrushing abrasion?
Patient wears through the restoration rather than tooth
Which material should be used for preventative restoration of toothbrushing abrasion lesions?
Ideally RMGIC as it has best survival rate
Can use GIC, composite or flowable
Composite may look better but higher modulus may compromise retention
Balance aesthetics and retention
Prevention of attrition
Generally more difficult to address as usually related to a parafunctional habit
CBT or hypnosis can be useful to reduce parafunction as a stress response
Splints - wear away instead of teeth, may break habit, soft ones can be used as a diagnostic aid
Which type of wear is unsuitable to be treated with a splint?
Erosion
Soft vs hard splint for attrition prevention
Soft - diagnostic device to show where wears faster
Hard - more robust and can be used longer term
Michigan splint
Popular hard splint providing ideal occlusion with even centric stops, has canine rise which provides disclussion in eccentric mandibular movements - canine guidance
Unsuitable patients for the Dahl technique
Active perio
TMJ problems
Post orthodontics
Bisphosphonates
If implants present
If existing conventional bridges
Most suitable pattern of wear for Dahl technique
Localised anterior
What material is most often used for the Dahl technique and why?
Composite
Better aesthetics, better compliance, easier to adjust, can be immediate definitive treatment
Which patient group has a faster rate of effect of the Dahl technique?
Younger
If no movement in ______ the Dahl technique is not going to work
6 months
Dahl technique
Method of gaining space in cases of localised tooth wear
(Originally using a removable CoCr anterior bite plane)
Palatal surfaces covered, allowing occlusion on raised cingulum, resulting in posterior disclusion and increase in OVD of 2-3mm
Occlusal contacts only on anteriors
Over 3-6 months you gain space between anteriors, anteriors intrude and posteriors erupt
Results in space between upper and lower anteriors for restoration without occlusal reduction
Surgical crown lengthening as treatment for wear
Exposes more of the crown for retention of final restoration
Repositioning of gingivae apically generally with removal of bone
Sensitivity
Still need occlusal reduction
Prevention of erosion
Even when erosion is not the best fit diagnosis for a toothwear case, it is likely to be part of the problem so should be considered in all cases
Dependent on the source of acid - intrinsic or extrinsic
Desensitising agents for symptomatic relief
Fluoride
Diet management
Habit changes
Control xerostomia
Anorexia/bulimia treatment
Control GORD, reflux, hiatus hernia
Discuss drugs with GMP
Proton pump rebound
If pt has taken PPIs for several months + it is possible that they may have rebound acid secretion and symptoms may get worse for up to two weeks when PPIs are stopped
This can easily be misinterpreted as a need for ongoing therapy
Prevention of abfraction
Assess occlusion on affected teeth - consider occlusal equilibration
Fill cavities with a low modulus restorative material - RMGIC and flowable
Passive management of toothwear
Prevention and monitoring
Should be the first part of any treatment of wear
Most patients will be in this phase for at least 6 months
For many patients this is all that is required
Active Management of tooth wear
Intervention threshold - when to progress to active management
Simple restorative intervention - covering exposed dentine, filling cupped defects in molars and incisors
The requirements for more extensive definitive restoration are not always clear - wear that leads to further complications, aesthetics beyond patient acceptability, leaving intervention may require more complex tx
The goal of active management of tooth wear
Preservation of remaining tooth structure
Pragmatic improvement in aesthetics
Functioning occlusion and stability
Active management of maxillary anterior tooth wear depends on 5 factors
Pattern of the tooth wear
Inter occlusal space
Space required for the restorations being planned
Quality and quantity of remaining tooth tissue, particularly enamel
Aesthetic demands of the patient
Categorisation of maxillary incisor wear
Tooth wear limited to the palatal surfaces only
Tooth wear involving the palatal and incisal edges with reduced clinical crown height
Tooth wear limited to labial surfaces
Types of maxillary anterior tooth wear cases where there is adequate inter-incisal space
If teeth wear rapidly and there is not time for alveolar compensation
Where there is an AOB
Where there is an increased overjet - in these cases there can be available space for restorations with no change in OVD
Which cases of maxillary anterior tooth wear are easiest to treat?
Thos with adequate inter-incisal space for restorations with no change in OVD
Why is there no increase in freeway space in most tooth wear cases?
There is compensation for the loss of tooth substance by dento-alveolar bone growth
Benefits and disadvantages of compensation for the loss of tooth substance by dento-alveolar bone growth
Maintains masticatory efficiency BUT leaves no space for restorations
Disadvantages of traditional method of tooth preparation to create space for traditional restorations in cases of tooth wear
Little tooth tissue to begin with
Poor retention due to short axial walls
Good chance of pulpal damage due to short clinical crowns
New materials offer a better, more conservative approach in these cases
Ways to make space for restorations in tooth wear cases
Increase OVD - multiple posterior extra-coronal restorations, reorganised approach, can be complex, destructive, expensive
Occlusal reorganisation from ICP to RCP - complicated, can be destructive, specialist treatment
Surgical crown lengthening - doesn’t really create more space
Elective RCT and post crowns - very destructive
Conventional orthodontics - lengthy treatment
Contraindications in anterior tooth wear for composite build up
Short roots (increasing crown to root ratio could cause orthodontic movement)
Reduced periodontal support due to periodontal disease
Lack of remaining enamel reduces the success rate significantly due to bond strength of composite to enamel
Composite bonding to minimally worn teeth with damage limited to palatal surface
Can be done with a high degree of confidence
First choice treatment in most anterior tooth wear cases
Composite bonding - non invasive
Ring of confidence
Remaining ring of enamel on worn tooth surfaces which has a very positive influence on retention of composite bonding
Is lower or upper anterior toothwear more difficult to treat?
Lower
Less enamel, smaller bonding area, more difficult moisture control
Composite bonding technique for lower anterior tooth wear
Possible to improve aesthetics but do not increase OVD
Do them before uppers
Same techniques as uppers
Wrap composite over and onto lingual surface
Treatment for cupping defects on posterior teeth
Fill with composite to protect dentine from erosion
Canine guidance in localised posterior tooth wear
Restorative care can be aimed at providing sufficient canine guidance to ensure posterior disclusion during lateral and protrusive movement
Composite resin added to the palatal of upper canines
Simple, effective and reversible technique, freehand or with diagnostic wax and template
Methods of composite build up
Direct build up with putty matrix
Clear vacuum formed matrix
Composite build up using putty matrix method
Alginate imps
Cast imps
Wax up build up on the cast
Take putty matrix of built up cast
Use matrix as template when placing composite build ups
Vacuum formed matrix method for composite build up
Alginate impression
Wax up on cast impression
Impression of this, cast in stone
Vacuum formed clear plastic matrix formed on this
Cut to size and use as mould for build up
Success of composite build ups for anterior tooth wear
Generally good pt satisfaction
Posterior occlusion normally re-achieved
Seldom TMJ problems
No detrimental effect on pulp health
No worsening of periodontal condition
Longevity of composite build ups for anterior tooth wear
Viable medium term option
Requires repair and maintenance
Maxillary restorations last better
No definitive figures, around 70% over 10 years
If they fail they can be replaced or repaired and no tooth destruction occurred during their placement
Why does maxillary composite bonding last longer than mandibular?
Increased bonding area, lower occlusal load, although tongue and saliva protect lowers
Information for pts on composite bonding for anterior tooth wear
Your front teeth will receive tooth coloured fillings to cover the exposed and worn tooth surface, preventing more wear
No, or minimal drilling, maybe LA
Add to tooth, no removal of tooth
Improved appearance should be possible
Bite will feel strange and might lisp or bite your tongue for a few days, chewing can be difficult
Only front teeth will meet, back ones will come together over 3-6 months
It is likely that posterior crowns, bridges or dentures will need replaced
Potential for debonding, replacement causes no damage
Maintenance will be required and will not be free forever
Categorisation of generalised toothwear
Excessive wear with loss of OVD
Excessive wear without loss of OVD but with available space
Excessive wear without loss of OVD and with no space available
Ideal first treatment option in generalised tooth wear
Adhesive approach first if possible
These can be used to asses the pts tolerance of a new occlusal scheme as a medium term restoration
If conventional preps are required later, these adhesive additions may form the bulk of the removed material, preserving tooth structure
Treatment of generalised excessive tooth wear with loss of OVD
Easiest but also least common
A splint can be used to assess the pts tolerance of the new face height - may not be necessary if adhesive approach used you can go straight in
Ideally half the OVD increase maxillary and half mandibular
Often a mixture of adhesive and conventional is required
Dentures may be required to provide posterior support at the new OVD
Treatment of generalised excessive tooth wear without loss of OVD, with available space
More complicated than loss of OVD to treat
Can involve occlusal reorganisation
A splint should be considered as an increase in occlusal face height is necessary
Most pt accommodate the increase
Restoration of anterior and posterior teeth then carried out at the new face height
If possible should involve minimal prep adhesive restorations
Treatment of generalised excessive tooth wear without loss of OVD, with no space available
Most severe and difficult to treat
Specialist opinion before treating
Attempt to increase OVD with splints or dentures if lack of posterior support
Crown lengthening surgery
Elective endodontics - destructive and post and cores do not go together with attrition
Ortho
Overdentures can be an option for these pts
Crown lengthening
Used to increase coronal tooth substance available
May result in black triangles between teeth where ID papilla is further down
Can lead to unfavourable crown to root ratio increasing chance of loosening or tooth movement if tooth loaded subsequently
Often post op sensitivity
Any subsequent conventional crown prep will be further down the root - problem if the tooth has a significant coronal-cervical taper, greater chance of pulpal damage
Overdentures
Preserve tooth substance and bone for support of denture when teeth are so worn down that restoration is impossible
Can be bulky for pt
Difficulties with keeping teeth and gingivae healthy underneath prosthesis
Record keeping of tooth wear cases
Where wear has been present for some time and not progressing, it is sufficient in most cases to record that it has been recognised, pointed out to pt and is being monitored
Advice must be recorded
If pt is not compliant, reluctant or unwilling to follow recommended course of action this must be recorded
Surface treatments such as topical fluoride must be recorded - important to record if pt complied with repeat applications
Discussions on consent must be recorded - pt must understand the proposed treatment, including passive prevention, as well as their part and how it is integral to a favourable outcome, must understand consequences of not following advice
Discussions on temporary treatment and this being explained, as well as the reason for not providing definitive at that time
Any referral documentation
Shortened dental arch
Kayser 1981
A dentition where most posterior teeth are missing
Satisfactory oral function without use of RPD
Priority given to maintaining an anterior and premolar dentition in one or both jaws
In the right circumstances, non replacement of posterior missing teeth can provide a stable and acceptable dentition
How many occlusal units are required for sufficient adaptive capacity to SDA?
3-5
What is an occlusal unit?
A pair of occluding premolars = one unit
A pair of occluding molars = two units
1992 WHO treatment goal for oral health
The retention, throughout life of a functional, aesthetic, natural dentition of not less than 20 teeth and not requiring recourse to prostheses
Indications for SDA appraoch
Missing posterior teeth with 3-5 occluding units available
Sufficient occlusal contacts to provide a large enough occlusal table
Favourable prognosis for remaining anterior and premolar teeth
Patient not motivated to pursue complex restorative plan
Limited financial resources for dental care
This strategy will only work long term if the remaining natural dentition can be preserved for the remainder of the lifetime of the patient
Contraindications for SDA approach
If there is a poor prognosis for remaining dentition
Untreated or advanced perio
Pre existing TMJDS
Signs of pathological tooth wear
The patient has significant malocclusion (severe class II or III)
Restore complete dental arch vs restore SDA
28 teeth, more complicated treatment at high cost, treatment results may be better
20-24 teeth, less complicated lower cost treatment, treatment results may be worse?
Considerations when tx planning SDA
Does pt have problems chewing?
Does pt have appearance concerns?
Does pt have discomfort such as traumatising gingivae?
Is there any evidence of occlusal instability as a result of the missing teeth?
Extra oral exam when considering pt for SDA
TMJ - click, crepitus, deviation, pain
Hypertrophy
Check skeletal relationship
Intra-oral exam when considering a pt for SDA approach
Check for signs of bruxism such as buccal keratosis, scalloping, trauma, wear facets, fractured restorations
Periodontal assessment
Occlusal assessment
Teeth of poor prognosis
Why are patient’s with a severe malocclusion unsuitable for SDA?
Not sufficient occlusal contact
Perio patient being considered for SDA
A course of non-surgical periodontal management should be planned if active disease
Therapy aimed at stabilising the periodontal condition of all remaining teeth
Evaluate response
Must be able to maintain perio health
What are the consequences of SDA approach in a patient with unstable perio?
Drifting of periodontally compromised teeth under occlusal load
Loss of alveolar bone leading to a compromised denture bearing area in the long term
Loss of space (neutral zone) for denture teeth in the long term
Consequences of distal tooth migration in SDA
Increases anterior load
Increases number and intensity of anterior occlusal contacts
Increased interdental spacing
This is exacerbated by inadequate perio support
Why is progressive tooth wear a contra-indication for SDA?
The long term threat this poses to survival of teeth
Gradual loss of occluding contacts and occlusal stability
Occlusal stability
The stability of tooth positioning relative to its spatial relationship in the occluding dental arches
or
The absence of the tendency for teeth to migrate other than the normal
Determining factors of occlusal stability
Periodontal support
Number of teeth in the arches
Interdental spacing
Occlusal contacts
Tooth wear
Typical effects in SDA of one or more teeth missing from arch
Tooth mobility
Tooth migration
Supra-eruption of unopposed teeth
Effects of distal tooth migration in SDA
Increased anterior load, in turn increasing the number and intensity of anterior occlusal contacts as well as the interdental spacing
Exacerbated when unopposed teeth and lone standing teeth have inadequate perio support
5 requirements of occlusal stability
Stable contacts on all teeth of equal intensity in centric relation
Anterior guidance in harmony with the envelope of function
Disclusion of all posterior teeth during mandibular protrusive movement
Disclusion of all posterior teeth on the non-working side during mandibular lateral movement
Disclusion of posterior teeth on the working side during mandibular lateral movement
Manifestations of traumatic occlusion
Fracture of restorations and/or teeth
Tooth mobility
Dental pain not explained by infection
Tooth wear
A traumatic occlusion may also be a contributing factor to TMJDS
TMD considerations for SDA approach
Does the pt have existing TMJDS?
Is this associated with tooth wear?
Loss of posterior support may be contributing to TMD
Replacement of missing teeth and correction of occlusal derangement may reduce TMD symptoms
Little evidence to support increased TMD problems with SDA
Extending SDA with resin bonded bridgework
Distal cantilever
Max one unit on each side of the arch
Light contact on cantilevered pontics in ICP
Minimal contact in excursive movements
Heavy contacts may lead to failure
Extending SDA with RPD
Bilateral free end saddle
RPI design
Consider with CU
Non-compliance
Conventional bridgework to extend SDA
Distal cantilever
One unit max on each side of arch
Light contact on cantilevered pontics in ICP
Minimal contact in excursive movements
Heavy contacts may lead to failure
Consider RPD
Implants to extend SDA
Single tooth in molar/premolar region with cantilever bridge
17 year old patient congenitally missing 22 and 23
Treatment options for filling the space
RBB
Removeable retainer with pontics
Implants
Assuming no relevant medical history, suggest 3 general factors to be considered before referring 17 year old with congenitally absent 22 and 23 for implants
Oral hygiene
Cost
Smoking
Amount of bone available
Perio history
That the patient understands what is likely to be included and is willing to comply
Three local factors assess for implant treatment planning
Width of alveolar bone
Space available between adjacent teeth
Bone height
Local perio
Smile line
Soft tissue adequacy
Gingival biotype
Plaque control
Three potential complications that you would warn patients about when consenting them for an implant retained bridge to replace 23 and 22 (congenitally missing)
Peri-implantitis or implant mucositis
Implant failure
Screw fracture
Crown or porcelain chip or fracture
Recession
Need for replacement
Tooth wear from the opposing dentition
Attrition
Tooth wear from acid
Erosion
Most common type of abrasion
Toothbrush abrasion
Tooth wear from a foreign object
Abrasion
Importance of aetiology in tooth wear
Allows attempt to reduce further wear
Plan for problems, contingencies and failure
Allows you and pt to be realistic
Identifies wider medical and wellbeing issues and allows signpositng
Prognostic indicator
Enhances consent process
Aids clinical diagnosis and treatment planning
What is meant by physiological tooth wear?
Normal amount of wear for the patients age
Modifying factors of attrition
Lack of posterior teeth
Occlusion - deep OB or edge to edge
Restorations
Erosion and abrasion
Stress and anxiety
Examples of occlusion that could make attrition worse
Deep OB - lower incisors
Edge to edge - localised wear