CC#4: Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnant Individuals Flashcards
Entities that comprise UTI (3)
ASB, symptomatic acute cystitis, pyelo
Percentage of pregnancies affected by UTI of some sort
~8%
Most common bacterial pathogen isolated from pregnant pts w/ UTI
E. coli
Pregnancy risks associated w/ presence of UTI (2)
PTD, LBW
Potential serious maternal complications of pyelo (3)
Sepsis, DIC, ARDS
Percentage of pregnant pts in whom ASB is identified
2-10%
Percentage of pregnant pts in whom acute cystitis is diagnosed; percentage of pregnant pts in whom pyelo is diagnosed
~1-2%; ~1-2%
When is pyelo most likely to occur?
2nd tri
Anatomic/Physiologic changes during pregnancy that can predispose pts to UTIs
Progesterone-induced ureteral dilation and mechanical compression of ureter by gravid uterus > increased residual volume in bladder and urinary stasis > VUR > increased risk of bacterial colonization and ascending infection
When should screening for ASB be performed; how should screening for ASB be performed?
At an early prenatal visit; w/ UCx
Why is screening for ASB indicated?
Because it has been shown to be associated w/ a decrease in pyelo
Are routine UDips at each PNV beneficial?
No (and also not sufficiently sensitive to detect ASB)
Reason that routine UDips are not beneficial/sensitive
Both midstream and midstream clean-catch specimens commonly have at least moderate contamination in pregnant pts (and because of increased risk of culture contamination w/ advancing gestational age, attempts at repeat collection may be futile)
Is additional screening indicated after initial negative screening UCx; why?
No; residual risk of pyelo is low
Maternal condition that may benefit from more frequent UTI screening; maternal conditions that do not merit additional screening for ASB beyond initial screen (2)
SCT; DM, SCI
Reason additional screening is not recommended for pts w/ SCI (3)
ASB seems to be protective against symptomatic UTI, tx can precipitate symptomatic UTI, tx can contribute to antimicrobial resistance
At what cutoff is ASB clinically significant; what do lower levels represent?
CFU >100,000 (ie 10^5); contamination from vulva/vagina
General tx recs for ASB
5-7 day course of abx that has demonstrated efficacy against most common bacteria in ASB/UTI (ie E. coli, Proteus, Klebsiella)
Abx exception to 5-7 day course rec for tx of ASB
Fosfomycin (has good efficacy as single-dose tx for both ASB and symptomatic acute cystitis)
When should tx be started for ASB?
Once bacteriuria is confirmed (and then altered if abx sensitivities show that isolated bacteria are not sensitive to initial choice of tx)
When should GBSbu be treated; what do lower levels indicate?
If CFU >100,000; do not require tx but should be noted as indication for intrapartum GBS ppx
Components of normal vulvovaginal flora that should not be treated (3)
Lactobacilli, Corynebacteria, coagulase-neg Staph)
Is TOC or repeat screening indicated s/p tx of ASB?
Evidence does not make rec
Common presenting sxs of acute cystitis (4)
Dysuria, hematuria, frequency, nocturia (which frequently overlap w/ common pregnancy sxs)
Most useful tool for triage of UTI sxs
UA
Definition of pyuria on UA
> 5 WBC/HPF, or presence of leuk esterase
Sensitivity of pyuria on UA; general specificity of pyuria on UA
97%; lower (because WBCs could be contaminants of vulva/vagina)
Specificity of nitrites on UA; general sensitivity of nitrites on UA
94-98%; lower (because not all bacteria produce nitrites)
NPV of UA w/ neither leuk esterase nor nitrites present
78-98%
Can UTI be excluded if UDip is entirely normal?
Yes
When can abx tx be initiated for symptomatic acute cystitis?
In presence of positive UA, for symptomatic relief
Situation in which empiric tx may be considered for symptomatic acute cystitis
When urine specimens cannot be collected and pt described new-onset dysuria and frequency
Should UCx be obtained in suspected symptomatic acute cystitis; why?
Ideally, yes; to confirm dx and direct abx therapy
Cutoff at which tx is indicated in symptomatic acute cystitis
Reasonable to treat CFU as low as 100 of a single organism (unlike in ASB) if sxs are present
Sensitivity of UDip w/ leuks; specificity of UDip w/ leuks; PPV of UDip w/ leuks; NPV of UDip w/ leuks
72-97%; 41-86%; 43-56; 82-91
Sensitivity of UDip w/ nitrites; specificity of UDip w/ nitrites; PPV of UDip w/ nitrites; NPV of UDip w/ nitrites
19-48%; 92-100%; 50-83; 70-88