Causation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

What is factual causation

A

The “but for” test, but for the defendants would the consequence have occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What is causation

A

The link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is legal causation

A

The “operating and substantial cause” test to find the link between the defendants act and the criminal consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is causation part of the actus reus or men’s rea of a crime

A

Actus reus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would be the two cases in factual causation

A

White and Paggett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened in Pagett

A

He used his girlfriend as a shield and she would not have died but for his actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in white

A

Put poison in his mothers tea and tried to kill her, she died anyway from a heart attack and ended up not causing her death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in Jordan

A

As the medical treatment was “palpably wrong” there was no legal causation and the defendant was acquitted and not charged for killing him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in smith (1959)

A

The original act was the operating and substantial cause and it was not the fact of being dropped on a stretcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the meaning of movie actus interveniens

A

“A new act intervening” which breaks the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the intervening act in Pagett, and also the other one for Jordan?

A

Pagett - The act of another person unconnected with the defendants act
Jordan - medical intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the think skull rule

A

“Take your victim as you find them” - in other words the law does not take into account and particular characteristics of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What would be a case for the thin skull rule?

A

R v Blaue - A Jehovah’s Witness refused a blood transfusion, the defendant said this was unreasonable and broke the chain of causation but the judge decided the stab wound caused the death, not her choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s the case for when the victims own act did not break the chain of causation

A

Roberts - jumping out of a moving car from fear of sexual assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s the case for when the victims own act did break the chain of causation

A

Williams - the victim caused his own injuries as his reason of being robbed was unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly