Breach of Duty Flashcards
What is the meaning for the reasonable man in Blyth v Birmingham waterworks?
An ordinary person performing a task reasonably competently.
How would you know if their is a breach of duty
If the defendant falls below the standard of care which a reasonable man would take, there is a breach.
What could be a factor impacting the standard of care
They can raise at lower standards.
What could be a case for special characteristics of the claimant? ( When the reasonable man takes more care when the situation demands)
Paris v Stepney borough council one eye welder given no goggles, owed a duty of care because of increased risk.
What could be some cases for special characteristics of the defendant?
Oridnary person - Wells v Cooper
Children - Mullins v Richards
Learners - Nettleship v Weston
Professionals - Bolam v Frien
What happened in Wells v Cooper
Fit a door handle like an ordinary man
What happened in Mullins v Richards
Held that a reasonable 15 year old would not foreseen the risk of harm with playing with rulers.
What happened in Nettleship v Weston
A learner is held to the same standard of all people
What happened in Bolam v Frien
they are operating to the standard expected under a known and accepted procedure
What could be a case for foreseeable risk?
Roe v Ministry of Health - Aesthetic was stored in a way which it could be contaminated (not known at the time)
What could be some cases for size of the risk? (The greater the risk, the greater care that needs to be taken)
Bolton v Stone ( cricket ball hit passer by) and Hayley v London electricity board ( Tripped over a tool identifying where a hole was, he was blind and didn’t see it)
What could be a case for have all precautions been taken (Looks at striking a balance between the risk and the cost and effort of taking adequate precautions)
Latimer v AEC - the floor in the factory was slippery after it had a flood and even though warning signs were placed on ten floor people still got injured from slipping and the courts decided all precautions was taken so no care was needed.
What could be a case for any benefits of the risk being taken? (This is an idea that in an emergency there may be situations which give rise to justifiable risks
Watt v Hertfordshire CC - fire fighters were injured by lifting gear while travelling in a vehicle not specifically fitted for carrying that gear.
What is the proof of breach
the general rule that all three elements of negligence must be established
What is res ipsa loquitor
Things speak for themselves, this is where the claimant has to show that the defendant was in the control of the situation that caused injury and the injury was more likely than not to have been caused by negligence