Breach of Duty Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the meaning for the reasonable man in Blyth v Birmingham waterworks?

A

An ordinary person performing a task reasonably competently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How would you know if their is a breach of duty

A

If the defendant falls below the standard of care which a reasonable man would take, there is a breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What could be a factor impacting the standard of care

A

They can raise at lower standards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What could be a case for special characteristics of the claimant? ( When the reasonable man takes more care when the situation demands)

A

Paris v Stepney borough council one eye welder given no goggles, owed a duty of care because of increased risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What could be some cases for special characteristics of the defendant?

A

Oridnary person - Wells v Cooper
Children - Mullins v Richards
Learners - Nettleship v Weston
Professionals - Bolam v Frien

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in Wells v Cooper

A

Fit a door handle like an ordinary man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in Mullins v Richards

A

Held that a reasonable 15 year old would not foreseen the risk of harm with playing with rulers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in Nettleship v Weston

A

A learner is held to the same standard of all people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in Bolam v Frien

A

they are operating to the standard expected under a known and accepted procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What could be a case for foreseeable risk?

A

Roe v Ministry of Health - Aesthetic was stored in a way which it could be contaminated (not known at the time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could be some cases for size of the risk? (The greater the risk, the greater care that needs to be taken)

A

Bolton v Stone ( cricket ball hit passer by) and Hayley v London electricity board ( Tripped over a tool identifying where a hole was, he was blind and didn’t see it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What could be a case for have all precautions been taken (Looks at striking a balance between the risk and the cost and effort of taking adequate precautions)

A

Latimer v AEC - the floor in the factory was slippery after it had a flood and even though warning signs were placed on ten floor people still got injured from slipping and the courts decided all precautions was taken so no care was needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What could be a case for any benefits of the risk being taken? (This is an idea that in an emergency there may be situations which give rise to justifiable risks

A

Watt v Hertfordshire CC - fire fighters were injured by lifting gear while travelling in a vehicle not specifically fitted for carrying that gear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the proof of breach

A

the general rule that all three elements of negligence must be established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is res ipsa loquitor

A

Things speak for themselves, this is where the claimant has to show that the defendant was in the control of the situation that caused injury and the injury was more likely than not to have been caused by negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens if ten claimant can show the two things in res ipsa loquitor

A

The burden of proof moves to the defendant to show that they was not negligent (Pearson v NW gas board)

17
Q

What are all the cases for Res Ipsa Loquitor?

A

Scott v St Katherines Docks, Mahon v Osbourne and Pearson v NW gas board.

18
Q

What happened in Scott v St Katherines Docks

A

The claimant was waiting along the dock and was hit by a bag of sugar that fell on his the head, res ispa loquitour was present so the C did not have to prove that the dock company was negligent.

19
Q

What happened in Mahon v Osbourne

A

swab left in patients body, held the doctor was under wholly control and was negligent in his death

20
Q

What happened in Pearson v WW gas board

A

a gas pipe exploded and ruined a woman’s house while killing her husband, the gas company was NOT negligent as all safety precautions was taken, it was due to the cold and not their own being.