Case Study Questions Flashcards
What was the contract type?
Build only - NEC3 option A – Fixed priced activity schedule
What Procurement Route?
Traditional – Build only – Single stage tender
What Secondary Clauses?
X4 PCG, X7 delay damages, X16 retention
What Value?
£1.9million
What Duration?
6 months
How many CE’s?
3/4
When did you join the project?
Just before contract award
Size of the site?
15,000m2
What was the scope?
- Ground remediation - treatment of contaminated soil for reuse
- Site clearance - vegatation
- Management of contaminated material - asbestos
- Excavation
- Install capping layer across the site
- Temporary site fencing
- Removal of existing boundary fencing
- Installation of permanent palisade boundary fencing
- Installation of a retaining wall
What were your responsibilities?
- Organise and chair risk reduction meetings based upon early warnings that had been raised
- Raise early warning notifications when required
- Assess application for payments and issue payment certificates
- Manage and forecast costs throughout the project
- Raise change request forms
- Assess compensation events and quotations
- Advise the project manager on administering the contract
- Advise the project team on the forms of communication that we should adhere too
- Advise the project team on procurement options for additional works
- Collate contract documentation including warranties and the Parent Company Guarantee (PCG)
What were the key risks and constraints on the project?
The project itself is not complex in design but there are elements to the delivery that should be highlighted:
• Contaminated land and compliance with a remediation strategy
• The contractor will have no design responsibility (apart from the design for temporary works)
• The contractor must adhere to the Construction Logistics Plan when accessing the site.
• Party wall/Border with Non-TfL Land
• Time dependencies from other packages of works
Who was the client?
The project manager acting for TfL
Who was the designer?
Separate Designer
Who was the contractor?
Main contractor constructing the works
Who was the principal designer?
Separate Designer
What is an activity schedule
A list of activities prepared by the Contractor which he expects to carry out in Providing the Works. Each activity is priced and them combined is the total of the prices.
Why didn’t the contractor create the activity schedule?
The NEC is silent on who creates the list of activities – but it is the contractor who prices it. Only the guidance note states the contractor should form the list, but this isn’t contractual so anyone can form the list.
As part of the design contractor the designer provided an activity schedule to align with the project requirements. This was used as part of the tender documents. The contractor had the option to change or expand activities as part of their tender.
Why did you advice the PM to agree to a change to the activity schedule?
Contractor at greater risk of insolvency
Explained to the PM that this would change TfL cash flow which they understood.
What did the other bidders do?
All the bids priced the activity schedule they were given and did not alter them so it did not affect the tender evaluation
How did you change the activities?
Activities with larger payments that were not paid until the end of the works were broken down.
Made sure to not include quantities and broken it down into activities and areas so that completion could not be misinterpreted.
What mechanism is there for changing the activity schedule contract under NEC3? What did you do?
The issue this change raises is the NEC3 contract does not have a contractual mechanism for implementing a change to the activity schedule without changes to a planned method of working.
Both parties signed a deed of variation in order to change the activity schedule.
I consulted with legal to ensure this was correct.
The deed detailed that the new activity schedule will be used going forward.
Under what circumstances can the activity schedule change?
Acceleration (clause 36.3)
By a change in the sequence of working (clause 54.2):
By the implementation of a compensation event (clause 63.12)