Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

What is Moffatt v Venus Packaging?

A

Two inter-connecting factory buildings capable of being separately let.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Re the Appeal of Heilbuth?

A

55 starter workshops capable of separate assessments as the landlord had no right to conduct business from them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Esselco v Dunlevey?

A

A reception area deleted as it was shared by all occupiers and reflected in the office values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Cardtronics?

A

Supreme Court Decision. ATM’s inside and outside retail stores held not separately rateable as retailers maintain paramount control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Ludgate House?

A

Court of Appeal found property guardians were not in paramount control so a large office should remain as one assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Jackson v Canary Wharf?

A

Upper Tribunal Decision. Offices stripped back to core awaiting a tenant for fit-out. UT dismissed VO’s appeal. The absence of an end date for refurbishment works was irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Newbiggin v Monk?

A

Supreme Court landmark case. Offices stripped back to core found to be undergoing refurbishment and reduced to £1. The assumption of repair does not override the reality principle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Porter v Gladman?

A

Newly constructed offices lacking partitioning, cabling, additional power points. No completion notice. Deleted from the Rating List.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Re the Appeal of Mouland?

A

A floor within Gatwick Airport. The Lands Tribunal held it was not an office, like the other floors, but a lounge with touchdown facilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Cheale Meats v Ray?

A

An abattoir assessed as industrial. Not considered in the same mode or category.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Scottish & Newcastle?

A

A pub in a parade of shops found to be in a different mode and category from those surrounding it. Shops may command a higher rent but the potential higher value was to be ignored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Gardiner & Theobald?

A

Identified issues with acting on a success related fee basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Street v Mountford?

A

Sets the differences between a lease and a licence. A lease provides an occupier with an estate in land. A licence is a permission to use it. A lease can be assigned, a licence cannot. A lease cannot be terminated until it expires/break clause. A licence can usually be revoked at any time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Woolway v Mazars?

A

A Supreme Court landmark case known as “the staircase tax”. In 2018 the Government passed legislation to reverse its effects. This enables contiguous properties, in common occupation, to form one assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Lotus & Delta?

A

Sets out procedures for considering evidence. 1. Rent on the property 2. The more closely the circumstances match, the more weight should be applied 3. Rents of similar properties should be considered in addition to 4. similar properties in the Rating List 5. Form an opinion using all evidence 6. If no rental evidence exists, actual rent is key.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Makro Properties Ltd v Bedworth Borough Council?

A

Rates mitigation case. 0.2% floor space occupied which counted as ‘occupied’.

17
Q

What is Ladies Hosiery & Underware v West Middlesex?

A

Correctness must not be sacrificed for uniformity. Shop assessed higher than others but rent supported the RV. Correct approach was to increase the others.

18
Q

What is K Shoeshops Ltd v Hardy?

A

Oxford and Regent Street being valued at different points in time. Antecedent Valuation Date now creates uniformity.

19
Q

What is Ballcroft Estates v Virk?

A

Former M&S should be valued at a nominal value due to lack of demand. Demand must be assumed so RV determined using rents from similar properties.

20
Q

What is Aviva Investors v Bunyan?

A

Warehouse deletion. Minor works took place which fell into the ‘repair’ category. May have been successful if submitted as an MCC and effective dates were known.

21
Q

What is Bunyan v Acenden?

A

Fitting out of offices relating to ‘generic market appeal. Could amortise the capital cost of fitting out, using a discount rate, but this case was based on comparing other rating assessments (per m2). This case was not about seeking the true value of the hereditament but the value in comparison to the rest.