CAREGIVER/INFANT + FATHER Flashcards

1
Q

What is ATTACHMENT?

A
  • emotional bond between 2 things
  • each seeks closeness
  • feels more secure in the presence of attachment figure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is STRANGER ANXIETY?

A

-distress of an infant in the presence of unknown individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is RECIPROCITY?

A
  • two ways or something that is mutual
  • infant and caregiver both active contributors in the interaction
  • responding to eachother
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY?

A
  • timing and pattern of the interaction

- infant and caregiver mirroring each others behaviour and emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the main assumptions of CAREGIVER-INFANT INTERACTIONS?

A
  • rhythmic and mutual
  • infant and caregiver promoting conversation involving similar sounds, emotions and contact
  • each can anticipate how the other will respond
  • interactional synchrony and reciprocity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a positive evaluation for INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY and RECIPROCITY? (1)

A

RESEARCH SUPPORT

  • condon and sander (1974)
  • caregiver-infant interactions in response to adult speech
  • used frame by frame analysis of films of babies
  • found babies move in time with the rhythm of conversation which shows turn taking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a positive evaluation for INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY and RECIPROCITY? (2)

A

RESEARCH SUPPORT

  • Isabella (1989)
  • observed 30 mothers and infants in their homes
  • measured degree of synchrony
  • found mother’s who showed more interactional synchrony=more securely attached
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a negative evaluation for INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY and RECIPROCITY?

A
  • difficult to interpret infants perspective
  • often babies hand movements and facial expressions are random
  • don’t know for certain behaviours seen in caregiver-infant reaction have special meaning
  • even if INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY and RECIPROCITY reliably observed, they don’t tell us the purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 4 stages of attachment identified by SCHAFFER?

A
  • pre attachment stage
  • indiscriminate attachment stage
  • discriminate attachment stage
  • multiple attachment stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the PRE ATTACHMENT STAGE?

A
  • birth to 6 weeks
  • similar responses to objects and people
  • preferences for faces and eyes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the INDISCRIMINATE ATTACHMENT STAGE?

A
  • 6 weeks to 6 months
  • preference for human company
  • can distinguish between people
  • doesn’t care who comforts them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the DISCRIMINATE ATTACHMENT STAGE?

A
  • 7 months and onward
  • infant shoes preference for one caregiver
  • displays separation and stranger anxiety
  • baby looks to particular people for security, comfort and protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the MULTIPLE ATTACHMENT STAGE?

A
  • 10 months onwards
  • attachment displayed to two or more people
  • fear of strangers weakens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was BOWLBYS main assumption?

A
  • infants form one primary attachment that forms internal working model
  • influence all other secondary attachments in the future
  • quality of main attachment is vital
  • known as BOWLBYS MONOTROPIC THEORY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the fathers role in attachment?

A
  • traditionally limited/minor role
  • they provide resources while mothers stay at home
  • recently their role has changed significantly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the roles fathers are thought to play in attachment?

A

Some researchers say:

  • men not equipped to form attachments
  • caring hormone oestrogen is scarce in men
  • fathers have playmate role instead for caregiver
  • if fathers show sensitive responsiveness they can form emotional bond
17
Q

What is a positive evaluation for fathers role as playmate

A
  • research support Geiger (1996)
  • fathers play interactions more exciting and pleasurable
  • mothers more nurturing and caring
  • shows father is playmate, mother is caregiver
18
Q

What is a negative evaluation for fathers ability to form bonds?

A
  • research by hrdy (1999)
  • found fathers less able to detect low levels of infant distress
  • supports lack of oestrogen in men as they are unequipped to form bonds
  • fathers role biologically determined by their biological make up
19
Q

What is a positive evaluation for sensitive responsiveness?

A
  • research found fathers can form close bonds if in intimate marriage
  • belsky et al (2009)
  • fathers with high marital intimacy=secure father-infant attachment
  • fathers with low marital intimacy=insecure father-infant attachment
  • strength of their father-infant attachment depends on marital relationship
  • fathers role is determined but also mediated by environment
20
Q

What did Shaffer and Emerson find and how?

A
  • They conducted a longitudinal study on working-class mothers in Glasgow
  • measuring attachment in natural settings in two ways (separation protest and stranger anxiety)
  • found these stages were correct
  • although 39% of attachments were not to the primary caregiver
  • Stronger attachments resulted in parents who responded to the child’s needs quickly, effectively and often.
  • 87% of children had multiple attachments at 18 months
  • 31% had five or more attachments
21
Q

What is caregiverese?

A
  • The infant and caregiver beginning to understand each other through their different noises and actions
  • a mother knowing that a certain sound means the child is hungry, but nobody else understands this