*** Cards Flashcards
Girls and Corrections***
Given smaller number of girls/women in CJS (compared to males) there has always been a more limited range and level of attention paid to programming for girls/women. Historically they’d teach females to be a “proper women”. Either that or it shifted to thinking of them as “monsters”…then to paternalism.
- Another injustice includes overuse of custody on girls who offend — especially true for failure to comply offences
- Inadequate programs and facilities
- Paternalism used to “protect” girls
- Sentencing often done with idea of “best interests” of young women (is this a throwback to the JDA?)
New Issues***
- Age and adult accountability: Contrary to UN specifications, Canada continues to have youth held in adult institutions in some cases
- Pretrial detention: continuing to increase with the YCJA
- Release conditions: criminalize more youth because release conditions are too restrictive for teens to live up to
- Parental rights/supports: The YCJA does not adequately support parents who are trying to be effective parents
- Cross-over kids: The justice system has failed to address the needs of those who start in the welfare/foster care system (under age 12) and become involved in the youth justice system.
Aboriginal youth issues
- Racism
- Effects of colonialism
- Cultural differences in meaningful justice
- Suicide, addictions, and other social problems
- Blurring/blending of child-welfare and youth justice system involvement (cross-over kids)
Aboriginal youth are overrepresented at all stages and levels of the Criminal Justice System. The UN has continued to insist that Canada do a better job addressing this. Overrepresentation and the underlying issues that have precipitated it.
Baumrind claims four types of parenting style***
each has variable degrees of demandingness and responsiveness
- Authoritative: These parents set standards for their children. They also set realistic expectations based on age of child. Discipline is discussed openly between parent and child. Bill Cosby and Theo.
- Authoritarian: These parents value obedience and authority in home. Children restricted in movement and punished with punitive means. That 70s show; often hard on son soft on daughter / or everyone.
- Indulgent: These parents allow kids considerable freedom to do as they want. Parents see themselves as friends of kids. Shun formal discipline. Adam’s Family.
- Indifferent: Neglectful parents who spend little time physically with kids. They are not emotionally invested in lives of their children.
Adult Sentencing and the YOA ***
- Those over 14 charged with a serious indictable offence could be transferred to an adult court; those 16 or 17 were automatically transferred unless they could demonstrate why they should be tried in youth court (reverse onus)
- Youth could receive an adult sentence
- Primary concern was where youth would receive best opportunity for rehabilitation
- The YCJA addressed concerns about bureaucratic and legal issues with the transfer system in place under YOA
- Primary change is that all youth charges are heard in youth court
- Adult sentences would be imposed for some convictions
_______
-
Presumptive offences: “serious offences” and “serious violent offences” committed by a youth over the age of 14 for which an adult could receive a prison sentence of more than 2 years.
a) This provision was determined to be a Charter violation and was removed under the changes imposed by Bill C-10
b) Only to be used for youth under 16, if it is felt a youth sentence would not enough to hold them accountable: offences considered presumptive; murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, and aggravated assault.**** [I find this confusing; Find part a&b confusing. find and read it in book] - If a youth is over 14 and has committed a serious violent offence for which an adult could be sentenced to more than 2 years, the Attorney General may apply to the youth justice court to have an adult sentence imposed
- Where a youth pleads not guilty and the case goes to trial, he or she may now elect a trial by jury if an adult sentence is being considered or if facing a charge of murder
Bridging the Gap: Aftercare and Community Reintegration ***
- Determinate sentences: Short sentences may disrupt programming for young offenders & hinder progress made. Should we keep them longer? — Unknown.
- Aftercare programs: provide skills and supports once a youth is released from custody. Throughcare
- Aftercare is tied to the community, which may explain success rates; More success in the city, less in rural communities.
- MST Multi-systemic Therapy: provides interventions to youth and his/her family. Perspective allowed for developing strategies within entire family so that youth & family can be empowered & productive. This addresses many of the factors that lead young people to be involved in the Justice System in first place — Holistic and very successful.
Parenting Style: Dianna Baumrind claims that there are two most important components of parenting…
- parental responsiveness
- parental demandingness
Youth Sentences: Non-custodial ***
- Reprimand: a lecture from the judge rather than an actual sentence
- Absolute discharge; no penalty
- Conditional discharge; if the conditions met the record is erased
- Fines; no more than $1000
- Community Service Order; no more than 240 hours and 12 months to complete
- Probation: Maximum is 2 years (3 in adult system)
- Treatment Order/ISSO, Intensive Support, & Supervision Order; court may detain youth for treatment in appropriate facility
- Attendance order; maximum of 240 hours (to attend treatment, etc)
Parental demandingness
the extent to which parents are demanding of appropriate behaviour from their children
Youth Centres ***
- Secure custody: under the YOA, required great restrictions of movement of youth offender both inside/outside of jail
- Open custody: under YOA, required fewer restrictions on movement both inside/outside of jail than secure custody
- Provinces varied in how they designated youth detention facilities, as either open or secure
- In Ontario, custody was further determined by age: 12-15 (phase I) and 16-17 (phase II)
- The YCJA does not require youth court to specify level of custody for young offenders
- All provinces required, however, to have both levels of custody in their jurisdiction
- The 2 phase system in Ontario was divided across 2 governmental ministries
- phase 1 was administered by ministry of community and social services
- phase 2 was under jurisdiction ministry of solicited general and correctional services
- Now though the provincial director determines levels of custody after the young person has been sentenced.
Positive directions***
It is argued that while the programming itself is often the focus of attention, it is the method of delivery that is most critical. Specifically staff must be aware of trauma issues and take a relational approach to their work. This approach has been the focus of youth custody recruitment for some time and is still discussed by hiring professionals today. Not all staff take this approach, but there’s an increased emphasis on finding appropriately trained and focused staff for female facilities. This seems key to rehabilitating, reintegrating and recreating healthy girls.
- Safe, supportive, female-centred environment with staff reflective of race and sexual orientation of the girls in custody
- Gender-responsive programming
- Varied educational and vocational programs
- Programs target abuse, eating disorders, assertiveness, parenting, child development, health, empowerment, relationships
4 kinds of Diversionary Measures
- restorative interventions
- reconciliation mediation
- retributive restitutive
- rehabilitory eductional
Is Youth Court Sentencing a “Slap on the Wrist”? ****
- Those who hold view usually based on extreme isolated cases found in media
- The term is also relative: All youth court cases are different
- Problem of comparisons: How to compare adult system with youth system?
- Comparisons between the JDA, YOA, and YCJA are also unfair
There are some who believe the provisions in the YCJA allowing the attorney general to apply for adult sentence (at 14 for specific offences) is not enough. They believe that those younger than 14 who commit serious violent offences are literally getting away with murder. A discussion might ensue about the UN provisions, which demand that we consider the youth offender as not fully capable of understanding consequences of his/her actions and the balancing act between considering youth as vulnerable and youth as out-of-control.
What Isn’t Addressed ***
- Learning disabilities (LD)
- Those with LD are at a greater risk of getting involved in the youth justice system
- They often don’t get help while in the system
- Youth with LD are less successful at reintegration
Role of Culture ***
How is Aboriginal culture different from non-Aboriginal culture? Four core beliefs:
- Not burdening others with one’s problems
- Thinking about the present and future rather than to the past (adversarial system is all about the past). Restorative justice is forward looking.
- A focus on the collective rather than the individual vs western individual based.
- An emphasis on healing and reconciliation
Indigenous cultures are not all the same. They are diverse but there are also commonalities among them. Not burdening others, thinking about present and future rather than past conflict with the expectations of most correctional programming. We expect offenders to acknowledge their feelings, accept responsibility for past behaviours and this is counter to the cultural expectations that are their norm. We also ask offenders to take responsibility for their actions and to talk about themselves, their feelings, and their plans for themselves (individualistic). Further our adversarial system focuses on punishment and reparation more than on healing and reconciliation.
Correctional Programs ***
- Designed to help facilitate rehabilitation and reintegration
- Includes programs in custody, as well as those following release or those given community sentences such as probation
- Community programs are usually contracted out to transfer payment agencies such as Elizabeth fry, John Howard society, St Leonard society and others.
- Variation in types of programming available in each facility/community program
Types of Programs ***
- General: apply to all offenders; life skills, education and recreation
- Offence-specific: anti-shoplifting/ firesetting/sex offending
- Offender-specific: offender’s problem behaviours; substance abuse/ anger management.