Cardiac output monitoring Flashcards
What are the different methods for assessing cardiac output?
Cardiac output can be assessed indirectly and directly.
Indirectly via both qualatitive and quantative methods.
INDIRECT
Clinical assessment of heart rate, peripheral perfusion (capillary refil), urine output, character of pulse, lactate, blood pressure. ETCO2 e.g. in an arrest.
DIRECT
- there are a number of direct methods including invasive and non invasive..
- invasive:
- the dye dilution
- thermodilution method
- using Ficks principle
- arterial waveform pulse contour analysis (PiCCO/ LiDCO)
- non invasive
- using oesophageal dopplers
- transthoracic dopplers
- electrical thoracic bioimpedance
what are the features of an ideal cardiac output monitor?
- cheap
- easy to use - minimal training
- accurate
- allows continous measurements
- non invasive and safe
indications for cardiac output monitoring?
critically ill paitents to find out if they need ionotropic or vasopressive support
pre-op assessment for cardiac surgery or non cardiac in those suspected with cardiac issues
research and clinical trials
what is the gold standard for CO measurements?
thermodilution method using pulmonary artery floatation catheter = PAFC
Swan Ganz catheter
How are transoesophageal dopplers used for cardiac output monitoring
this method relies on the fact that sound waves change frequency as a object moves closer/ further away. Hence the frequency change seen is related to velocity.
The oesophageal probe is lubricated and placed 35-40cm (from the teeth) into the oesophagus such that its end can be placed on the left wall in contact with descending aorta.
It is angulated to 45 degrees such that the velocity of blood can be calculated via the equation relating velocity to frequency shift and angle of contact.
the doppler monitor then creates a graph for velocity change overtime.
the area in the curve is the stroke distance
by finding the cross sectional area of the aorta this can be muliplied by stroke distance to give a volume i.e. stroke volume.
Although descending aorta = 70% of total stroke volume
so this can be divided by 0.7 to give total SV
finally CO = HR x SV
what is the formula used by oesophageal doppler to calculate the velocity of blood
frequency shift x speed of sound in blood
divided by 2x original freq x cos 90.
Frequency shift is the difference between transmitted and received frequency
how is aortic cross sectional area measured?
2 methods
either directly via the doppler - some dopplers will measure the diameter of the aorta.
or using nonograms to give an estimate based on gender, age, height, weight.
what information is available from an oesophageal doppler monitor?
SV and CO
info on contractility..
peak velocity - peak of the curve
accelaration - gradient of upstroke
Flow time corrected
pressure gradient across heart valves
what is the flow time corrected and what can a short and long FTc indicate
Flow time corrected (FTc) = flow time is the width of the waveform. this is then corrected for HR by dividing flow time by the square root of QT interval
normal range 330 - 360ms
short = impaired filling of LV e.g. mitral stenosis, excess vasopressors, hypovolaemia
long = vasodilation e.g. sepsis
how is the pressure gradient across the heart valves calculated?
ΔP = 4V^2
what can the peak velocity tell you about afterload/ preload?
peak velocity will be reduced with
* reduced preload
* increased afterload
what is the cardiac index?
CI = CO / BSA
(BSA = body surface area in m^2)
it is used for easier comparison of CO values as it removes body size as a factor influencing CO.
what is a normal cardiac index?
2.5 to 3.6 L/min/m2
how can the oesophageal doppler be used in fluid management assesment?
measure SV using doppler
give fluid bolus
if >10% increase in SV , suggests fluid responsivenes.
which scenarios may oesophageal doppler be innaccurate?
aortic pathologies
- coarctation of aorta - measuring in descending after narrowing
- thoracic aortic aneurysm - especially if the aortic diameter measurements are measured directly via the doppler rather than nonograms
oesophageal pathology
-stricture or tumour - obsecures view
technical
- improper positioning of probe
- patient movement / inadequate sedation
when are oesophageal dopplers contraindicated?
oesophageal varices
clotting abnormalities
recent oesophageal surgery
patient refusal
what are the pros and cons of the oesophageal doppler method for CO measurement?
pros
- minimally invasive
- safe in most people
- easy to set up , no extra lines etc needed
- can give useful info on CO, contractility, FTc
- quick
- real time measurements
cons:
- still requires a GA
- risk of oesophageal perforation
- requires skilled user for positioning and interpretation - hence variation
- can result in errors from incorrect positioning
- makes a few assumptions
what errors is the oesophageal doppler prone to?
incorrect placement of probe
suboptimal position
measures coeliac artery instead - blood flow in diastole
measures pulmonary artery instead - opposite direction of blood flow.
what assumptions does the oesophageal doppler make?
descending aorta always 70% of CO
the size of aorta does not change in systole
all blood is flowing with same velocity
for each of the following state the abnormalities
- can see there is a low FTc (normal 330-360) which suggests inadequate filling of LV. also low peak and slow upstoke and reduced CI. overall suggest hypovolaemia or vasopressors.
- small SV, low peak velocity, normal FTc. suggest LV failure.
- variation in peak height = AF
- flow towards and away from probe - aortic regurgitation. reverse flow seen in diastole. also large SV and prolonged FTc
- prolonged FTc, high CO, high peak velocity, likely sepsis
- reverse flow, likely measure pulmonary artery.
what is a normal peak velocity?
age related
in adults 90 cm/s and 120 cm/s.
as low as 30cm/s in elderly