Business Strategy Flashcards
Strategy
- top managers handle the relationship between the organization, its strategy and its environment
- strategy to attain outcomes consistent with organizational goals and policies (setting the goals is the tricky part)
Strategy FIT Relationships (3)
- Performance
- Environment
- Organization
Strategy Levels (4)
- Corporate - where to compete?
- Business - how to compete?
- Functional - how to contribute?
- -> all lead to choice of products, markets, competitors - International
Strategic Management Process
Commitments > Decisions > Actions
- Strategic Competitiveness - achieved when a firm successfully formulates and implements value-creating strategy (i.e. in order to compete)
- Sustained Competitive Advantage - occurs when a firm develops a strategy that competitors are not simultaneously implementing (unable to duplicate) - the holy grail of strategy
- Above-Average Returns - returns in excess of what an investor expects to earn from other investments with similar risk (achieved from sustainable competitive advantage)
Challenges of Strategic Management
e. g. Borders
- competitive success is transient - unless care is taken to preserve competitive position
Strategic Management - Two Schools of Thought
- Industrial Organization Model (the outside environment shapes the firm) - e.g. attractive industry, strategy, assets & skills, strategy implementation
- Resource-Based Model (inside firm determines strategy) - e.g. resources & capabilities, competitive advantage, then attractive industry, strategy implementation
Strategy Concept Components
- Goals - provide direction, respond to stakeholders
- Plans - define strategies, develop via planning, derive from formal analysis
- Actions - indicate realized strategies, result of planning & adaptation
Coherence in Strategic Direction - Vision (how organizations set goals)
- company vision is at the top of the hierarchy of goals
- can’t be too specific
- need a vision even in a small company
- doesn’t change
- don’t do just anything that will make money - not strategic
Coherence in Strategic Direction - Mission Statement
- mission statement is in the middle of the hierarchy of goals
- can change but do it consciously
- purpose of the company, more specific than the vision
- focused on the means by which the firm will compete
- basis of competitive advantage
Coherence in Strategic Direction - Strategic Objectives
- on the bottom of the hierarchy of goals
- operationalizing the mission statement
- provide guidance how firm can fulfill higher goals
- even more specific, measurable, realistic, timely, challenging, yardstick for incentives
Articulating a Vision (reading)
Yin = core idealology (core values and purpose - company's reason for being) - look inside, can't be fake Yang = envisioned future (10-30 year BHAG, vivid description)
BHAG (reading)
Big Hairy Audacious Goals - aid long-term vision
- difference between having a goal and taking on a huge, daunting challenge.
- a catalyst for team spirit
- clear finish line
Operational Effectiveness vs. Strategic Positioning (reading)
Operational Effectiveness (OE) = performing similar activities better than rivals perform them. Excellence in activities. (necessary but not sufficient)
Strategic Vision = performing different activities from rivals or performing similar activities in different ways. (firm can only outperform rivals if it can establish a difference it can preserve)
Trade-Offs and Fit (reading)
Trade-Offs are essential to strategy (more of one thing means less of another). Create a need for choice and purposely limit what the company can do e.g. cost and value
Fit drives both competitive advantage and sustainability.. Strategy is about combining activities (activity system). Consistent, activity reinforcement, optimization of effort
Corporate Governance
- a relationship among the stakeholders that is used to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations
- identifies ways to ensure that strategic decisions are made effectively
- used to establish order between firm owners and top-level managers
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
- basis of modern firm = shareholders purchase stock and are residual claimants, they reduce risk with diversified portfolios, professional managers make decisions
- modern firm leads to efficient specialization of tasks - stockholders are unperturbed by having to manage the risk
Agency Relationship
Shareholders (principal) = firm owners
Managers (agent) = decision makers
Principal is a risk-bearing specialist that pays compensation to the decision-making specialist (agent)
Agency Problem
- occurs when the desires or goals of the principle and agent conflict and it’s difficult or expensive for the principal to verify that the agent has behaved appropriately
- Solution: incentive-based performance contracts, monitoring mechanisms (board of directors) - often come from family and friends so not always at 100% arms length (agency conflict) but do their best
Governance Mechanisms (4)
- Ownership Concentration - large blocks of shareholders have incentive to monitor closely, may also obtain board seats
- Board of Directors - insiders, related outsiders, outsiders. Recommended to increase diversity of board and have a formal process to evaluate board
- Executive Compensation - salary, bonuses, long term compensation, stock ownership - many factors involved
- Market for Corporate Control - firms operate more efficiently as a result of a “threat” of takeover
Key Question of Ethical Behavior and CSR
Should strategic decision makers be responsible only to shareholders or do they have broader responsibilities?
CSR: Friedman vs. Carroll
- Friedman = traditional view (only responsibility is profits)
- Carroll’s Four Responsibilities
1. Economic (must do)
2. Legal (have to do)
3. Ethical (should do)
4. Discretionary (might do)
Three Approaches to Ethical Behavior
- Utilitarian - actions and plans judged by consequences
- Individual Rights - people have a fundamental right to be respected in all decisions
- Justice - distribution of costs and benefits to be equitable, fair and impartial
Corporate Governance and Ethical Behavior: Stakeholders
- it’s important to serve the interests of the firm’s multiple stakeholder groups
- organizations have dependency relationships with stakeholders but not equally dependent on all
1. Capital Market Stakeholders - shareholders
2. Product Market Stakeholders - customers, suppliers, etc.
3. Organizational Stakeholders - employees, management
Environmental Analysis
- everything that happens outside the firm, not just industry (country, city, legal environment, etc.)
1. Scanning - identifying early signals of environment changes/trends
2. Monitoring - detecting meaning through ongoing observation of changes/trends
3. Forecasting ** - first and foremost, developing projections of anticipated outcomes given change/trends
4. Assessing - determining the timing/importance of changes/trends for firms’ strategies
Also, Competitor Intelligence - spending time to get to know your competitors (e.g. go buy their product)
Macro Level Forces (Environmental Analysis) - 6
Outer Circle Should consider and look for trends in the following: 1. demographic 2. economic 3. sociocultural (e.g. women in the workforce) 4. political/legal 5. technological 6. global
Industry Level Forces (Environmental Analysis) - 5
Circle within outer circle of Macro level
- Threat of new entrants
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Threat of substitution
- Rivalry among competing firms
Industry-Level Forces - Threat of New Entrants
- seriousness depends on:
1. barriers to entry - exist when newcomers confront obstacles, economic factors out entrant at disadvantage
2. reaction of existing firms - common barriers: economies of scale, access to distribution channels, strong brand preferences/loyalty, learning curve
- threat stronger when: barriers are low, sizable pool of entry candidates exist, newcomer expects high profits, no incumbents fighting it
Industry-Level Forces - Threat of Substitute Products
- matter when customers are attracted to products of firms in other industries (e.g. contacts vs. glasses)
- threat stronger when: readily available, attractively priced, switching costs low
Concentration Ratio (CR4)
- based on top 4 firms in the industry
- closer to 1 = concentrated
- closer to 0 = fragmented
- greater concentration can lead to greater market power (in terms of the power of buyers/suppliers)
Industry-Level Forces - Power of Suppliers
- stronger the force, the more suppliers can exercise power over prices, quality/performance, amounts/delivery times
- industry-to-industry comparison
- high when: item is large portion of the product’s cost, costly for industry to switch, suppliers have good reputation, cheaper than industry can make
Industry-Level Forces - Power of Buyers
- stronger the force, the more suppliers can exercise power over prices, quality/performance, amounts/delivery times
- industry-to-industry comparison
- buyers are not always the end consumer (retail stores, etc.)
- higher when: buyers are large and purchase sizable percentage of industry’s product, when buyers can integrate, product is standardized, switching cost low, product purchased does not save money
Industry-Level Forces - Rivalry Among Competitors
- check which weapon of competitive rivalry are more actively used by rivals: price, quality, performance, customer service, innovation, etc.
- rivalry is more intense when: lots of firms compete, slow market growth, low switching costs, costs more to get out than in
Competitive Environment - Attractive vs. Unattractive
Attractive: rivalry is weak, threat of new entrants low (barriers high), subs don’t exist or are weak, suppliers/buyers have weak bargaining power (e.g. pharma)
Unattractive: rivalry is strong, threat of new entrants high(barriers low), subs are strong, suppliers/buyers have considerable bargaining power (e.g. automobile, airline, soft drinks)
Assessing Industry Attractiveness
- will competitive forces become weaker/stronger?
- market size and growth potential
- potential for entry/exit of major firms
- stability/dependability of demand
- severity of problems facing industry
- degree of uncertainty in future
Industry Evolution - Four Trajectories (reading)
- Radical - both core activities and core assets are threatened with obsolescence (everything is up in the air)
- Progressive - everyone has incentive to preserve the status quo
- Creative - relationships with customers/suppliers are stable, assets turn over constantly
- Intermediating - buyers and suppliers have new options but core assets are retained if they’re used in new ways
Internal Analysis - Resource-Based Approach
- Identify and classify firm’s resources (strengths and weaknesses)
- Combine firm’s strengths into capabilities (core competencies and distinctive competencies)
- Profit potential of resources (sustainable competitive advantage
- Select strategy (exploit resources relative to external opportunities
- Identify resource gaps (invest in upgrading weaknesses)
Resource Sustainability Scale
High = slow-cycle resources (hard to imitate) Middle = standard-cycle resources Low = fast-cycle resources (easy to imitate)
Internal Analysis - Capabilities
- firm’s ability to integrate firm resources to achieve desired objective
- capabilities develop over time (complex interactions, interrelationship between tangible/intangible assets - hard to imitate)
- unique combinations of capabilities create core competencies
Internal Analysis - Core Competencies (4 Criteria)
- Valuable - create value for the customer
- Rare - possessed by few
- Costly to Imitate - other firms can not develop easily
- Non-Substitutable - do not have strategic equivalents
VRIO framework (perfect example: natural resources)
Never take for granted that core competencies will continue to be a source of competitive advantage and also have risk of becoming core rigidities
- strategic myopia can strangle the firm’s ability to grow
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses - use value chain analysis
Opportunities, Threats - use industry analysis
- not very robust overall
Value Chain Analysis - Primary Activities
Rate each of the following as weak, strong, or fair
Primary Activities
- Inbound Logistics - getting raw materials to the right place, right time (HR or physical)
- Operations - creating the final good
- Outbound Logistics - getting the final good to the customer
- Marketing and Sales - sell something you’ve already made
- Service - customer feedback, warrantee, etc.
Value Chain Analysis - Support Activities
Rate each of the following as weak, strong, or fair
Support Activities (permeate all the primary activities)
- Infrastructure - physical and financial and top management
- HR - hiring, training, retaining talent
- Technology Development - R&D
- Procurement - purchasing, raw materials, etc.
Outsourcing
- firms often purchase a portion of their value creating activities from specialty external suppliers who can perform these functions more efficiently
- rationales for outsourcing
1. improve business focus
2. access to better capabilities
3. share risks
4. frees resources for other purposes
Total Value System
Value Chains are part of a total value system
Supplier Value Chain + Firm Value Chain + Channel Value Chain + Buyer Value Chain
The Diversified Corporation as a Tree (reading)
the trunk and major limbs = core products
smaller branches = business units
leaves, fruit, flowers = end product
root system that provides nourishment, sustenance, sustainability = core competence
*Miss the strength of a firm if you are only looking at its end products
Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage
- essence of strategy is achieving sustainable competitive advantage
- built around firm’s internal strengths
- sustainable competitive advantage can be achieved by:
1. creating tomorrow’s competitive advantage faster than competitors
2. having inimitable resources or positions
Core Competency > Strategy > Business Level Strategy
Resources/Capabilities that have been determined to be a source of competitive advantage > Integrated and coordinated set of actions taken to exploit core competencies and gain comp. adv > actions to provide value to customers and gain a competitive adv. by exploiting core competencies in specific, individual product markets
Three Generic Business Strategies
- Differentiation - unique and superior value
- Cost Leadership - design product more efficiently, low price
- Focus (value and low cost) - narrow product lines, buyer segments
Basis of Competition (3)
- Quality (e.g. performance, service, image, etc.)
- Cost
- Focus (i.e. understanding your customers)