Burn, part 3 (Schwartz) Flashcards

1
Q

4 crucial assessments in a burn patient

A
  1. Airway management
  2. Evaluation of other injuries
  3. Estimation of burn size
  4. Diagnosis of CO and cyanide poisoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Signs of impending respiratory compromise

A
  1. hoarse voice
  2. wheezing
  3. stridor
  4. subjective dyspnea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Remarks on perioral burns

A

“Perioral burns and singed nasal hairs alone do not indicate an upper airway injury, but are signs that the oral cavity and pharynx should be further evaluated for mucosal injury.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

two large-bore IV catheters are ideal when?

A

burn TBSA >40%
Central venous access and intraosseous access should be considered when peripheral access cannot be easily obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Remarks on x-rays in a burn patient

A
  1. Urgent radiology studies, such as a chest x-ray, should be performed in the emergency department
  2. But nonurgent skeletal evaluation (i.e., extremity X-rays) can be done in the ICU to avoid hypothermia and delayed resuscitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Remarks on hypothermia

A
  1. Hypothermia is a common prehospital complication that contributes to resuscitation failure
  2. Patients should be wrapped with clean blankets in transport

ª3. Cooling should be avoided in patients with moderate or large (>20% TBSA) burns

ªFor larger burns, sterile drapes are preferred because application of saline-soaked dressings to a large area can cause hypothermia (Tintinalli)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Remarks on prophylactic antibiotics

A

Patients with acute burn injuries should NEVER receive prophylactic antibiotics.
This intervention has been clearly demonstrated to promote development of fungal infections and resistant organisms and was abandoned in the mid-1980s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Rule of the palm”

A

For smaller or odd-shaped burns, the “rule of the palm” where the palmar surface of the hand, including the digits, is 1 % TBSA is useful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

This diagram gives a more accurate accounting of the true burn size in children and adults

A

Lund and Browder chart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Remarks on burn size estimation

A
  1. The importance of an accurate burn size assessment cannot be overemphasized.
  2. Superficial or first-degree burns should not be included when calculating burn size
  3. Thorough cleaning of soot and debris is mandatory to avoid confusing soiled skin with burns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Remarks on high-voltage electrical injuries

A
  1. > 1000 V
  2. Long-term neurologic symptoms and cataract development is not uncommon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Remarks on hydrofluoric acid chemical injury

A
  1. causes liquefactive necrosis
  2. causes hypocalcemia
  3. mainstay treatment: topical application of calcium gluconate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Remarks on formic acid chemical injury

A

may cause hemolysis and hemoglobinuria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remarks on the zone of stasis

A
  1. With variable degrees of vasoconstriction and resultant ischemia, much like a second-degree burn
  2. Appropriate resuscitation and wound care may prevent conversion to a deeper wound
  3. But infection or suboptimal perfusion may result in an increase in burn depth
  4. This is clinically relevant because many superficial partial-thickness burns will heal with nonoperative management, and the majority of deep partial-thickness burns benefit from excision and skin grafting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Most robust indicators for burn mortality

A

Age, Burn size, and Inhalational injury
Accounted for by the Revised Baux Score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parkland or Baxter formula for fluid resuscitation

A

3-4 mL/kg per % burn of PLRS.
Half - first 8 horus
Half - next 16 hours

17
Q

ABA consensus formula for fluid resuscitation

A

2 mL/kg per % burn of PLRS.
Half - first 8 horus
Half - next 16 hours
(given the tendency toward excessive fluid administration with the traditional formulas)

18
Q

2 resuscitation endpoints in fluid resuscitation

A

MAP >60 mmHg
UO
- adults: 0.5-1 mL/kg/hour
- pedia: 1-1.5 mL/kg/hour

19
Q

fluid resuscitation in children

A

For children <20 kg, deliver a weight-based maintenance IV fluid with glucose supplementation in addition to the calculated resuscitation with pLRS

20
Q

Remarks on colloids

A
  1. In late resuscitation when the capillary leak has closed, colloid administration may decrease overall fluid volumes and potentially decrease associated complications such as intra-abdoinal hypertension
  2. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward mortality benefit for patients receiving albumin
  3. May use albumin as an adjunct during burn resuscitation
21
Q

Blood transfusion in burn patients

A
  1. Blood transfusion are considered immunomodulatory and potentially immunosuppresive, which may lead to increased infection and higher mortality
  2. Restrictive transfusion (Hgb threshold 7 g/dL) is recommended over the traditional transfusion trigger of 10 g/dL
  3. Another approach is to perform blood transfusions only when there is an apparent physiologic need