Bowlby's monotropic theory Flashcards
1
Q
Monotropy
A
- A child’s att to a certain caregiver is different and more important than others
- More time spent with the primary att figure the better
- 2 principles:
- Law of continuity - the more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better quality off att
- Law of accumulated separation - the effects of every separation from the mother add up (the safest dose is 0)
2
Q
Social releasers
A
Social releasers are innate ‘cute’ behaviours (e.g smiling, cooing) that are supposed to attract attention from adults and make adults attached to them
- Bowlby recognised the att was reciprocal - both mother and baby are wired to become attached
3
Q
Critical period
A
- Time within which an att must form if it is to form at all
- Bowlby proposed there is a critical period at around 6 months
- Viewed it more as a sensitive period - child is sensitive between 6 months and 2 years
- If att isn’t formed in this time, child will find it harder to form one later
4
Q
Internal working model
A
- A child forms a mental representation of their relationship with their primary att figure - serves as a model of what relationships are like
- e.g child who forms loving relationship with caregiver will form an expectation that all relationships are loving - will bring these qualities to their future relationships
- Opposite for child who forms a poor relationship with caregiver
- IWM affects the child’s later ability to parent - people tend to base their parenting behaviour on their own experiences of being parented
5
Q
BMT - Evaluation - Strength
A
- Support for social releasers
- Clear evidence that cute baby behaviours are designed to elicit interaction from caregivers
- Research observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers - instructed babies PAF to ignore their babies social releasers - babies became distressed and lay motionless
- Illustrates role of social releasers in emotional development and attachment development
6
Q
BMT - Evaluation - Limitation
A
- Concept of monotropy lacks validity
- Research found that although most babies did attach to one person at first, a significant minority formed multiple att at the same time
- Although first att does seem to have a strong influence on later behaviour - may mean that att isn’t different just stronger
- e.g other att to family members provide all same key qualities
- Bowlby may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance to child’s primary att