Block 15 - part 3 Flashcards
levels of resource allocation decisions
macro (societal), micro (clinical) levels
macro level of resource allocation decisions
regard health funding v education or funding of certain drugs
micro level of resource allocation decisions
individual decisions regarding care of individual patients
arguments for age-based rationing being applied to macro level of resource allocation decisions
treatment and care of elderly people is very costly so ‘cost-effective’ argument might require resources elsewhere
arguments against age-based rationing being applied to macro level of resource allocation decisions
most of the elderly burden related to the cost of illness and incapacity rather than age, young person with chronic/serious disease could also cost the same amount
fair innings argument 1997
older people have had a longer life already, therefore fairer to divert resources to younger people. Elderly also have a disproportionate share of available resources allocated to them
contraindications to fair innings argument 1997
treating on the basis of need might mean older people don’t receive lower priority, years of life saved shouldn’t matter, quality of life is more important e.g. QALYs, fairness is not only thing that matters, equal treatment matters
arguments for age-based rationing being applied to micro level of resource allocation decisions
age should be rlevant because older people are less likely to respond to treatment and have a poorer prognosis in general due to increased complication risk
arguments against age-based rationing being applied to micro level of resource allocation decisions
age alone is not a good predictor of prognosis/complications hence need case-by-case decisions, decisions based on age may be hidden form of discrimination
age discrimination
unjustifiable difference in treatment based solely on age
direct age discrimination
direct difference in treatment based on age, cannot be justified
indirect age discrimination
neutral provision or practice that has harmful repercussions on a person based on their age
GMC view on age discrimination
must not unfairly discriminate against patients or let views about patient affect decisions
law view on age discrimination
equality act 2010, protects age, sex, race, gender, disability, religion, etc
QALY calculation
assign a utility value (0-1) to a state of health then multiply by number of years expected to live in this state, e.g. 0.5 QALY points x 5 years = 2.5 QALYs
what leads to a utilitarian justification
QALYs focus on overall likely outcomes of resource allocations
type of healthcare when cost per QALY is low
high priority, efficient health care
type of healthcare when cost per QALY is high
low priority
arguments for QALY based assessments
maximises healthcare based on quality and quantity of life, considers individual patient level when informing decisions about whether or not to proceed with and invasive procedure based on QALYs they are likely to gain
arguments against QALY based assessments
difficulties in measuring - how do you measure quality of life? introduces bias, can seem unjust - can favour life years over individual lives
relationship between age and QALY
older you are = fewer QALYs gained dure to lower life expectancy + co morbidities, doesn’t aim for ageism but is still indirectly discriminatory
body which appraises medical technology in pounds per QALY
NICE