BL - Corp. & Dir. - TUV Flashcards
What are the questions that must be asked when considering voidable transactions?
- Did the transaction involve a ‘connected person’ or ‘associate’?
- Did the transaction take place within the ‘relevant time’?
- Was the company insolvent at the time of the transaction or did it become insolvent as a result of the transaction?
- Is there a presumption available which shifts the burden of proof from the liquidator/administrator to the other party?
Transactions at Undervalue
What are the defences against transactions at under value?
the company entered into the transaction in
- good faith and
- business purpose and
- benefit of the company.
Transactions at Undervalue
What happens to the purchaser in a transactions at under value?
🎁
Court has discretion to make such order as it thinks fit to restore the position as if the company had not entered into the transaction.
Any order:
- should not be prejudiced provided they were acting in good faith AND for value
- there is a rebuttable presumption that the acquisition was not in good faith where the subsequent purchaser either:
- had notice of the relevant surrounding circumstances; or
- was connected
Transactions at Undervalue for companies:
When must a TUV have occurred?
Within the 2 years preceding the onset of insolvency (regardless of whether connected)
Transactions at Undervalue
Who has to prove that the company was insolvent at the time of the TUV?
the applicant, unless:
where a transaction is entered into with a connected party, insolvency is presumed unless the connected person can prove otherwise.