Biology, Health, and Disease Flashcards
Outline the trade off organisms experience, and different strategies used to overcome this
- Energy source- tradeoff between growth, maintenance, and reproduction
- fast life history strategy- more energy for reproduction (large litters, low investment per offspring in hope that half survive e.g.)
- slow life history strategy- more energy into growth and reproduction- produce single offspring and greta investment into them
Outline the relationship between different life history traits
Jones, 2011:
- larger size relates to older age at first reproduction, longer lifespan, and lower annual fertility rates
- suggests life history traits may come as package
- standard patterns across species, but primates have slightly slower reproduction and live slightly longer
Definitions of life history
Hutchings, 2021: a solution that natural selection has produced to solve the problem of how to persist in a given environment
Reznik, 2010: predicts how natural selection should shape the way organisms parcel their resources into making babies
List life history traits
- size at birth
- growth pattern
- age and size at maturity
- number, size, and sex of offspring
- age-, stage- or size-specific reproductive effort
- age-, stage- or size-specific survival
- lifespan
Outline different types of mortality, and their relationship with life history strategy
- Extrinsic mortality = death caused by some factor largely outside of an organisms control such as disease, starvation, predation
- Intrinsic mortality = death due to bodily deterioration/senescence
Life history strongly associated with degree of extrinsic mortality- high associated with live fast/have lots of small offspring/die young life strategy
Compare life history of humans and other primates
Zimmerman et al, 2015:
- longer post-reproductive lifespan
- slightly longer gestation (270 days vs 26- in others)- but amount of growth achieved in those 9 months is much larger
- DeSilva, 2011: larger brains, larger babies
Outline human feral growth
- first trimester- organogenesis- formation of organs and physiological systems of the body
- second trimester- skeletal growth
- third trimester- fat build ups, physiological preparedness for extra-uterine life
- 12-26 weeks- 5/6 fold increase in weight
Outline human growth and development during infancy
Growth:
- 0-3 years- rapid growth velocity (10-20cm/year increase in height)
- steep deceleration with age
Milestones:
- Transition from breast-feeding to solid foods (weaning)
- Full set of deciduous teeth before third birthday: two incisors, one canine, two molars
- Bipedal walking by ~15mo
- Learning motors skills, language, social relationships
- Shared intentionality and theory of mind developed by 3yo
Compare weaning in humans and other mammals
- processes rather than single event in all
-non-industrial societies- mean age of breastfeeidng termination 36 months (much earlier than other apes) - generally a fast life history strategy
Outline the human juvenile period
- In a general mammalian content, the juvenile period often includes everything after weaning and sexual maturity
- In humans, split this period into childhood, juvenility, and adolescence
Important features:
* Brain growth finishes much earlier than overall body growth
* We are energetically dependent for much longer than other primates
* The adolescent growth-spurt is derived in humans
* We could reach adult body size much more rapidly than we do
Compare brain and body growth in humans
Kuzaqa et al, 2014:
- brain growth finishes much earlier
- brains hugely energetically demanding to grow/maintain- estimated proportion of basal metabolic rate in children is ~60% in 5yo
- growth concentrated in childhood- by end of childhood (~8yo)- body size is ~70% adult hight, brain size >95% adult size
Outline energetic dependency in humans compared to other primates
- Kaplan et al (2000)- energetically dependent for much longer than other primates
Outline the adolescent growth spurt in humans and Peter primates
- A body weight growth spurt is seen in chimpanzees and many other Old World monkeys (often just for males, not females)- sexual dimorphism not seen in same way in humans- Hamada et al, 2002
- However, evidence for a spurt in skeletal growth (as we see in humans) is less clear- spurt in skeletal growth not seen in chimpanzees
- skeletal growth spurt is evolutionarily novel
Outline catch-up growth
- A rapid increase in growth velocity following a short-term period of starvation or illness which slowed or stopped growth (Bogin, 2020)
- suggests rate of growth slower than could be- extends period for brain and technical skill development- rely on parent provisions- suggest spreading out costs helps parents to invest in own reproduction, increases time for socialisation, play, and the development of complex social and cultural behaviour
Outline. study of catch-up growth
Hermanussen et al, 2018:
- Case study of severe malnutrition in German school-age children toward the end of WWI
- Children grew between 3-5cm in 8 weeks of supplementary feeding
- however, only if came from in-tact social background
Bogin et al, 2018:
- celiac child- at 11, was below 3rd percentile for age- caused by celiac as couldn’t get energy from diet
- catch up growth by 17- reached 50th percentile- rate of growth 2-3x faster than typical for age
Compare the adult reproductive period in humans and other primates
Wells et al, 2007:
- duration not unusual, but rate of reproduction is
- humans have shorter inter-birth interval- higher fertility- 3yrs average vs 4-7 in some primates
- not possible to get pregnant while breastfeeding- lactational amonhorea
Compare maternal investment strategies in humans and other primates
- humans- more offspring in same amount of time- chimpanzees have one at a time investment, whereas humans have several dependent off spring at once- newborn stacking- affects energetic demand on parents
- this is feature of fast life history strategy
Categorise human life history strategies as part of either slow or fast life history strategy
- pregnancy duration- long- slow
- birth size- high- slow
- lactation period- short- fast
- pre-reproductive period- slow
- pregnancy duration- between
- shorter inter-birth intervals and high fertility- fast
Outline factors needing to balance in human offspring/life history’s nd the solution to this
- question how to increase quantity of offspring an divestment in each
- potential answer- energetic interdependence (Kaplan et al, 2000)
- shift to calorie-dense, large-package, skill-intensive food resources is responsible for the unique evolutionary trajectory
- shift produced co-evolutionary selection pressures, which, in turn, operated to produce the extreme intelligence, long developmental period, three-generational system of resource flows, and exceptionally long adult life characteristic of our species
Distinctive features of human growth and life-history summary
- Large relative birth weight
- Shorter period of lactation, followed by extended period of energetic dependence on adults
- A relatively slow period of growth during childhood but with adult brain size achieved at ~8years.
- An adolescent spurt in skeletal growth not seen in other primates
- Shorter inter-birth intervals
Outline figures highlighting human energetic inefficiency
- Adult body: ~125,000 kcals
- 1,500 kcals/day for 20years = ~11 million kcals
- means have ‘lost’ ~99% of the energy you have consumed
What is energetics
the study of the use and transfer of energy
- energy is the common currency for everything in human evolution- studying human energetics allows us to better understand the evolutionary causes, consequences, and relationships that exist between key human traits such as large brains, hunter-gathering niche, large babies, bipedalism, meat eating, long childhood, cooperative social behaviour etc; helps us to understand differences in health, growth, reproduction, and body size across human populations
Outline parts of total energy expenditure
Snodgrass (2012):
Basic survival costs (costs of somatic maintenance):
- basal metabolic rate
- thermic effect of food
- thermoregulation
- immune activity
- physical activity
Productive costs:
- growth (including muscular)
- reproduction
- fat storage
Summarise energetics and transfers between species
- 1st law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy): energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transferred or changed from one form to another
- Energy used for somatic maintenance and physical activity rather than growth of tissues is ‘lost’ from the food chain
- only ~10% of energy transferred between adjacent trophic levels, limiting the length of food chains- limited by energetic inefficiency
Outline calories
- calorie is the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of exactly one gram of water by one degree Celsius at one atmospheric pressure
- not all calories equal- e.g. milk has most of energy in form of lactose, whereas Jerusalem artichoke has most in form of inulin (largely indigestible by humans)- different values despite having similar calories per 100g (66/73)
Outline the additive model of energy expenditure
Pontzer, 2015:
- suggests TEE composed of baseline running cost for non-physical activity expenditure (BMR-fixed), and any additional costs depending on physical activity
Outline an example of an energetically unusual pophulatopmn- background
The Hadza/Hadzabe (Raichlen et al, 2016):
population ~1,200 people, ~300 still primarily foragers
* Northern Tanzania, S of Lake Eyasi
* Serengeti plateau (and Olduvai gorge) to the north
* Language isolate
* Encroachment from pastoralists (and tourism)
* Interest in their lives motivated (rightly or wrongly) by assumption of savannah foraging as the key environment in human evolutionary history
Outline physical activity in hunter-gatherers
248-90 min/day across different populations- highest Bayaka men, lowest Tismane women (Pontzer et al, 2018)
- WHO recommendations 150/week
Outline physical activity in HAzda populations
- Racihlen et al (2016) - men 114, women 150 min/day exercise
- Wood et al, 2021- men 10-20,000 steps per dat, women >10,000- higher Han average smartphone users across 11,000 countries
Link increased physical exercise and total energy expenditure
Pontzer et al (2012)- compared total energy expenditure (kCal/day) across (USA), hunter-gatherer (Hadza, Tanzania), and farming (Bolivia) populations using doubly labelled water
- Physical activity significantly higher in the hunter-gather and farming populations than the Western one
- Overall, higher fat free mass = higher TEE
- no difference between populations in this relationship- average daily energy expenditure of traditional Hadza foragers was no different than that of Westerners after controlling for body size- higher physical activity didn’t result in higher TEE for hunter-gatheres/farmers
- similar results in adults in Ghana, South Africa, Seychelles, Jamaica, and USA- increase from inactive to moderately active, but then flatlines- not linear like additive model would suggests- only possible if BMR dynamics,ically responds (Pontzer et al, 206)
Outline an improves model of energy expenditure
Constrained model (Pontxer et al, 2015):
- There is an upper limit to TEE
- non-physical activity energy
expenditure responds dynamically to physical activity
- metabolic trade-offs- humans adapt dynamically to changes in daily physical activity, maintaining total energy expenditure within a narrow range
- Chronic exercise thus suppresses other physiological activity, including immunity, reproduction, and stress response
- exercise-induced downregulation improves health at moderate levels of physical activity but can be detrimental at extreme workloads
Negative energy balance response diagram
Outline the Minnesota starvation study
wells, 2010:
- Starvation and how to treat it as a major concern towards end of WWII- 6 young men; conscientious objectors
- Halving of dietary intake for 6 months, tightly controlled (~3000 kcal - ~1500 kcal/day)
- 24% decrease in body mass
- Controlled and then ad libitum refeeding
- Monitoring of weight, body composition, physiological performance
- unrestricted food intake caused overshoot in fat mass (weight returned but most of gain it fat mass)- may be result of appetite dysregulation and metabolic changes
Compare TEE of humans to other apes, list potential reasons for this
Pontzer et al (2016):
- 400 more than chimpanzees, 635 than gorillas, 820 than bonobos
- reasons- energetic demands of human life history, expensive tissue hypothesis, changing energetic costs and benefits of human subsistence
Outline the effects of human life history on energetic demands
- part of reproductive strategy- high investment in offpspring- Dunsworth et al, 2012
- birth stacking- Pavard et al, 2019
Outline the expensive tissue hypothesis
- brain- expensive- 20% BMR to brain but only makes up 2% of weight (Aiello & Wheeler, 1995)
Outline changing energetic costs and benefits of human subsistence
Kraft et al, 2021:
- elevated energy capture
- shift from great ape foraging to hunter-gathering, and then adoption of subsistence farming during Neolithic revolution- involved changes in behaviour and technology to access novel food resources
- meant humans paid higher energiy costs to acquire more calories in less time- minimises time costs but not energy costs- improved return Raes but efficiency similar to that of other great apes
Outline brain size and growth in humans
- primates- ranges 1g-1400g; apes- 275-750g- no overlap with other groups
- great apes 400-700 cm3 capacity; humans 1100-1700cm3 (Dean, 2014)
- human brain larger at birth than any other primates, smaller at birth in relation to adult brain size than any other primate (Neuubauer et al, 2012)
Outline brain energy use
Kuzawa et al, 2014:
Estimated proportion of BMR dedicated to the brain:
* ~50% at birth
* ~20% in adulthood (vs. 8-10% non-
human primates; 3-5% non-primate mammals)
- however, not most energetically menacing by weight- similar energetic demanding level as liver (Wang, 2010)
Compare gestational length in humans and other primates
Dufour et al (2002):
- Human gestation length is (relative to our body size) typical for primates
- However human are babies are much larger relative to adult body size than is typical for primates
Outline energy costs of pregnancy
Dufour et al (2002:
- capital gains- increased issue mass, fetus and associated tissues, maternal tissue hyperplasia, maternal fat gain
- sunning costs- increased BMR, increased cost of physical activity
- eating changes- only increased demand of 277kcal/day
- however, 277kcal/day is difficult to detect without a very
large sample
- Reduced physical activity could make up for the difference: additional intake not necessarily required
Outline energetic costs of lactation
Dufour et al, 2002:
* Lactation (during the period of exclusive breastfeeding) is more energetically demanding per day than pregnancy
* Duration of lactation may be greater than duration of gestation
* Costs, as estimated for the first 3 months by Dewey (1997): ~750g/day, 0.67kcal/gram = ~ 500kcal/day- almost twice as demanding per day as pregnancy ~25% increase in energy expenditure
- assumption that this additional energy expenditure is paid for partly by the catabolism of fat stores set down during pregnancy
- ‘maternal fat gain’ component of the estimated costs of pregnancy were ~40% of the pregnancy estimate
- Without these advanced costs of lactation, pregnancy is <200kcal/day
Definitions of aging
Physiological- López-Otín et al (2013)- characterized by a progressive loss of physiological integrity, leading to impaired function and increased vulnerability to death
Evolutionary- Ackermann and Pletcher (2003)- decline in condition with increasing age that manifests itself as a reduction in the rate of survival and fecundity
Aging and senescence used synonymously, though aging could be more broadly defined as a simple chronological increase in age
Outline patterns of human ageing
Ackemann & Pletcher, 2008:
- age specific mortality- early spike (infant mortality)
- exponential increase with age after (10 fold between 20 and 6)
- chnace of death doubles every 7-8 years after 35 yrs
- fertility rate falls post 35
Austad & Finch, 2010- age related increase in mortality is substantial- If humans did not age and could preserve their pristine physiological peak (typically near the age of puberty) then life expectancy in the US in 2000 would have been ~5,000 years