Behaviour and Ecology Flashcards

1
Q

Outline common elements of anthropocentrism, including examples of these qualities being seen in the animal kingdom

A
  • intelligence- assessment of chimp working memory using. umber sequence patterns- 90% right compared to human 1/30- suggests chimps outperform in short term working memory (note- role of language- intelligence is just word not real entity need to specify and not work backwards from)
  • morality- chimps have awareness when not being given fair reward (capacity to understand fairness)
  • culture/ spirituality- Goodall- awe/wonder exhibited in primates e.g. watching waterfall (note- may be anthropomorphising, but parsimony principles means shouldn’t include possibility that same underlying mechanisms in closely related species
  • deep bonds- found monkeys gather round spy monkey when perceived as dead and observed changes in mood and displays of empathy, can measure oxytocin release when bonding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the study of humans in the context of the animal kingdom

A
  • Complex cognition, social behaviour and traditions can be found in non-human animals i.e. they must be thought of as part of the natural world.
  • We can analyse human psychology, relationships and culture as adaptations that have evolved via natural selection.
  • Uniquely large demographic success- adapt/strategise to inhabit newly all planets environments- results in great cross-cultural diversity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline Tinbergens 4 questions about behaviours (1963)

A
  1. What is the evolutionary history of the behaviour?
  2. What is the ontogeny of the behaviour i.e. how is the behaviour driven by developmental processes?
  3. What are the proximate causes of the behaviour? E.g. physiological underpinnings
  4. What is the ultimate function of the behaviour i.e. how does/did it increase evolutionary fitness?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline human perspective on genetic representation in offspring

A
  • not that humans care or have subconscious interest in genetic fitness (Pinker, 1997)
  • Under Darwins 3 pillars (variation, heritability + competition), fitness enhancing traits become more prevalent in population over many generations
  • e.g. don’t have sex as want to propagate genes, do because genes coding for sexual desire were propagated (if mutation for no promoting hormones, would go extinct in 1 generation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline evolutionary psychology

A
  • Human psychology consists of mental modules which have been selected to deal with specific fitness related problems e.g. ‘cheater detection module’
  • Modules evolved in response to pressures faced recurrently by our Pleistocene ancestors livings as HGs – The Environmental of Evolutionary Adaptedness (EEA).
  • In post-Neolithic transition populations cognition and behaviour is often maladaptive as natural selection is slow
  • Behaviour is relatively inflexible and genetically determined- genetic evolution slow so psychological is also- lag creates mismatch
  • Human nature is universal; thus studying diversity and using ethnographic methods is a low priority in EP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline human behavioural ecology

A
  • emphasises behavioural flexibility0 diversity in local conditions- reaction norms which produce adaptive behaviour in response to socio-ecological conditions (adaptionist)
  • behavioural and phenotypic gambits- no contraints in terms of proximate mechanisms (not concerned) or genetic architecture
  • concerned with understanding behavioural diversity within and between societies
  • emphasis on ethnographic fieldwork
  • topics of interest- production systems, reproductive behaviour (mate choice and marriage systems), cooperative behaviour, life history
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

list different ways of life throughout human history

A
  • hunting and gathering
  • horticulture
  • farming
  • pastoralism
  • industrialised market economies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline hunter gatherer societies

A
  • ~95% of our species’ history- until 10kya
  • Extant simple HGs forage for nutrient dense resources and acquisition, depends on skill and luck- no cultivation
  • rely heavily on food sharing due to lack of food storage,
  • Populations structured into fluid multi-family camps; nomadic
  • Politically egalitarian (no dominance hierarchy)
  • Usually serially monogamous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline horticulture

A
  • Small-scale agricultural practice in simple gardens
  • more sedentary
  • Low productivity compared with intensive agriculture - no irrigation, crop rotation etc- ‘slash and burn’ technique.
  • Usually practiced alongside foraging
  • Relatively egalitarian and settlement more stable than HGs
  • Almost all matrilineal societies are horticulturalists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline farming as way of life

A
  • Neolithic revolution occurred ~10kya.
  • Inequality from farmers accumulating resources, storing food and owning land
  • The productive unit is usually the family
  • Inheritance usually patrilineal
  • Farmers are sedentary and usually patrilocal
  • Marriages are often polygynous; but the rare instances of formal polyandry occur among agricultural societies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline pastoralism

A
  • practice animal husbandry, heavily reliant
  • Semi-nomadic moving between focal pasture sites at different times of year, usually driven by seasonal changes – transhumance (portable resource)
  • Raiding to capture livestock of other groups is common
  • Status + cattle inheritance is strictly patrilineal – ‘the cow is the
    enemy of matriliny and the friend of patriliny.’ (Aberle 1961)
  • Inequality high and polygyny is common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline industrialised market economies

A
  • No longer reliant on self supporting substinence, economic activities are specialised and commerce is fundamental.
  • The residential unit is the nuclear family and monogamy is often socially imposed.
  • Inequality is variable but usually high.
  • Family size substantially reduced in societies that have undergone the demographic transition
  • WEIRD societies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline sex differences in gametes/fundamental reproductive physiology

A
  • anisogamy- difference sin size and form of gametes between sexes
  • Oogamy- large non-motile eggs and small motile sperm
  • eggs lower in number and more metabolically costly to produce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline the influence of sex difference in gametes/fundamental reproductive physiology on reproductive strategy

A
  • Fewer and costlier sex cells set females on an evolutionary trajectory to invest relatively more time and energy in offspring to ensure a return on initial investment.
  • Greater parental investment e.g. carrying and breastfeeding(Trivers1972) results in a slower potential reproductive rate for females (Clutton- Brock & Vincent 1991) esp. mammals (internal gestation and lactation)
  • limiting resource on male fitness is mates; whereas is resources for females (e.g. food) that provide energy for reproduction and increase offspring survival
  • A male mating with a different female everyday continuously increases his reproductive success, a female mating with a different male everyday does not
  • means predict that females will be the choosy sex (drivers, 1972) as seek fitness return, and that males will compete for mating access
  • sexual selection can take intra (some mass more likely to be chosen than others- direct competition) or inter sexual form (chosen as mate by member of opposite sex)
  • intrasexual- may be direct physical e.g. sperm competition- mediated by post-copulation physiological mating mechanism- e.g. testes size (proxy for sperm competition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline made choice as mediated by investment

A
  • when males only contribute sperm, females attracted to costly signals of male genetic quality (e.g. healthy genes/immune system) that will be ingested by offspring; males may search for signals of fecundity but aren’t choosey
  • when offspring benefit from male parental investment, females consider the resources (genetic/material) a male can offer e.g. through gifts, and males consider females residual reproductive value and genetic quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline honest signals and physical attractiveness

A
  • For a signal to evolve, must be honest/costly to fake
  • Zahavi’s handicap principle e.g. high testosterone supresses the immune system and produces a strong jawline
  • Symmetry- ability to maintain stable development in spite of environmental pressures- reflects genetic quality and immunocompetence (heterozygosity)
  • genetic dispositions that promote attraction to honest qualities indicative of fitness do well, simultaneous benefit to mate as good to be chosen
  • signal only in equilibrium if honest/reliable has to be related to genetic quality for selection to favour disposition for attractiveness- has to be costly to select those able to express signal (true representation of genetic fitness)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Outline human mate choice as a result of reproductive strategy/investment

A
  • human offspring highly dependent so expect women to care about willingness and ability to invest resources, not just genes
  • variation both within and between populations in male parenting effort
  • Men ought to be attracted to signals of reproductive value since women’s fecundity declines with age (attracted to health/youth/fecundity signals)
  • evolutionary psychology- males do invest in humans so should choosy, and females not just considering genetic quality as resources/investment important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Study on sex differences in human mate choice across populations

A

Buss (1989):
- 37 populations
- In all 37 populations men rated physical attractiveness as more important than women; and in 36/37 women rated financial prospects as more important than men
- cultural variation was more pronounced than variation between the sexes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Case study on cultural variability/ecological adaptation of sex comparisons in mate choice

A

Marlowe, 2004:
- Hadza hunter-gatherer- disease burden and pathogen stress very high
- women’s resource acquisition crucial to support family
- physical attractiveness equally important to men and women
- men often state women’s work ethics is important driver of partner choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

terminology- mating/marriage

A

poly = many
mono = one
gamía = spouses
gyne = woman
anēr = man
- monogamy- M-F
- polygyny- 1 M multi F
- polyandry- multi M 1F
- promiscuity- multi M multi F
Mating ≠ Marriage; Genetic ≠ Social

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Outline rates of polyandry and reasons

A
  • Women’s reproductive output is not a function of number of mates/husbands.
  • If women are aiming to secure paternal investment for needy offspring, they ought to minimise paternity uncertainty
  • Men will be less inclined to care for young if they are unsure of biological parentage
  • When polyandry does occur it is usually fraternal i.e. multiple brothers married to one woman as have overlapping genetic interests (seen in Tibetan populations)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Outline the polyandry threshold model

A
  • female fitness is largely impacted by resources provided by mate questions why would be complicit in polygyny
  • Orians, 1969- if male territory quality demonstrates substantial variation polygyny can be adaptive for females
  • A female may have better resource access as the second mate of a territory rich male than the sole mate of a territory poor male
  • could achieve same level of fitness as co-female of met with more resources- in populations of sufficient inequality- if have more than double resources (especially if arriving into population- richest males already taken)
  • Borgerhoff-Mulder (1988) applied the PTM to humans when studying marriages practices of the Kipsigis agro- pastoralist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Outline ecologically imposed monogamy

A
  • Males face a trade-off between mating and parenting effort
  • In certain ecologies the dependence on paternal investment is so high
    that a complete transition to parenting effort is the best strategy
  • More likely if male care is non-generalisable (e.g. provisioning) and not substitutable with maternal effort- no man can afford offspring from multiple wives
  • Environmental richness negatively associated with monogamy (Low, 2003)
24
Q

Outline side elements to cooperation

A
  • mutualism- collaboration between
    individuals that generates immediate fitness
    benefits for both parties, often refers to
    interspecific collaboration (e.g. humpback whales collaborative hunting with bubbles to push prey to top)
  • commensalism- interaction providing a
    benefit to one party and neither a cost nor
    benefit to the other (e.g. smaller fish using larger marine animal for transport)
  • neither have cost so don’t pose evolutionary puzzle
25
Q

Outline the problem of cooperation

A
  • A behaviour is altruistic (cooperative) if the actor provides a benefit to another individual at a cost to themselves
  • The ultimate currency is fitness
  • If such behaviour is by definition costly, surely genes coding for cooperation would be destined for extinction, yet cooperation is rife in the natural world
26
Q

Outline an early explanation of altruism

A

Behaving for good of group:
- group selection- Wynne-Edwards (1962)- animals have population regulatory mechanisms
- Lorenz- non-human animals have instincts preventing intra-specific lethal violence, which occurs in us due to weapon use
- general group selection argument for altruism- cooperative groups out compete non cooperative ones

27
Q

Issues with group selection theory of alturism

A
  • Selfish free riders will enjoy the benefits of co-operators altruism and pay no cost themselves.
  • Each generation the proportion of selfish individuals in the population increases until co-operators go extinct
  • selfish mutant problem-advantage of selfish individuals in within-group competition- as soon as have within group variation, have within group competition (selection happens and gene level and so at individual level)
28
Q

Outline Hamiltons rule and kin selection

A
  • selection occurs at the level of the gene.
  • Altruistic behaviour directed towards genetic relatives can simultaneously be costly to the actor but beneficial to his/her genes
  • If Br (benefit discounted by coefficient of relatedness) >C (cost of behaviour) the action increases the actor’s inclusive fitness
  • Inclusive fitness accounts for replication of genes via personal reproduction (direct fitness) + reproduction of genetic relatives (indirect fitness)
  • e.g. making alarm call- causes greater genetic representation in nest generation and cooperative gene more represented in next generation than selfish gene
29
Q

Research studies demonstrating Hamiltons rule

A
  • Critteden et al (2012)- Hamiltons rule predicts how much time spend looking after others children, relates to likelehood of reproduction
  • Mysterud (2006)- degree of relatedness links t amount of money invested
30
Q

Outline unusual reproductive systems in relation to altruism

A

Eusociality (e.g. ants):
- in colonies workers dont reproduce- sophisticated labour division- e.g. morphologically specialised food ants
- may be to do with hapolidiploidy

31
Q

Outline kin recognition (altruism)

A
  • Alvergne et al, 2009- phenotypic matching- facial resemblance, olfactory cues
  • Westermarck effect (1981) and imprinting suggests early life exposure
  • important for incest avoidance as well as directing altruism
32
Q

Outline the concept of reciprocal altruism

A

Trivers, 1971:
* X helps Y, providing benefit By at cost Cx.
* Adaptive if Y helps X at the same time (trade) or a later time (delayed reciprocity) and provides Bx > Cx
* Relevant currency is fitness, not amount or type of help
* Likely if one can provide a large benefit at a small cost – asymmetry in effects on fitness
* Its evolution relies on repeated interactions + cognitive capacities e.g. memory and partner discrimination
* May have selected for a psychology of fairness and tit for tat + emotions of spite and guilt
- e.g. vampire bloods where relationship between time last feed and to starvation exponentional- regurgitate if recently eaten
- Newton-Fosher et al (2011)- time spent grooming related to time getting grooming, Crockford et al (2013)- oxytocin release may be proximate mechanism of this

33
Q

Outline potential issues with reciprocal altruism models

A
  • Altruism is sometimes directed towards unrelated individuals who
    cannot reciprocate e.g. charity donation
  • Cooperation often occurs on large-scales between strangers e.g. warfare and provision of public goods- collective action problem
  • Humans often cooperate with non kin in a non reciprocal context, perhaps due to mismatch or cultural institutions that punish free riders
34
Q

outline evolutionary psychology explanation of the charity problem (reciprocal altruism)

A
  • we have stone-age
    minds adapted to a hunter-gather lifestyle.
  • Natural selection is slow > lag in adaptation > maladaptive behaviour
  • Claim - charity is a misfiring of psychological mechanisms like empathy, which evolved to facilitate nepotism when we lived in closely related hunter-gatherer bands
35
Q

Outline potential influence of culture on reciprocal altruism

A
  • Human cultures have social norms and institutions which punish violation of norms- causes alignment of individual and group interests- prevent within group competition as all follow norm
  • Groups with cooperative social norms outcompeted others in intergroup competition e.g. warfare
  • Cultural group selection (Boyd & Richerson 2009) doesn’t suffer from the selfish mutant problem as mutants/migrations
    adhere to norms to avoid punishment
  • Maybe patriotic values and group psychology compete with
    instincts like kin selection
36
Q

Outline other factors that may influence altruism

A
  • More cooperative if we are being observed
  • More likely to help those who have a
    reputation as helpers
  • care what others say about- good
    reputation provides activates neurological
    reward centres in the same way as material rewards (Izuma et al, 2008)
  • Gossip makes up two thirds of conversational content (Dunbar et al. 1997)
37
Q

Define parental investment

A

Any investment by a parent in offspring that increases the offspring’s
likelihood of survival and reproduction at the cost of the parent’s
ability to invest in/produce other offspring (Trivers 1972)- e.g. deeding/nursing/material

38
Q

Outline sex ratio terminology

A
  • BSR- birth, ASR- adult, OSR- operational
  • primary- fertilisation, secondary- BS, tertiary- ASR
  • expressed as ratio (males:1 F), number of males per 100 females, or decimal (proportion of males)
39
Q

principle for why not evolved to have female ratio bias

A

Fishers principle

40
Q

Outline fishers principle

A
  • Assumptions- sexual reproduction, random mating, both sexes equally costly
  • Producing the rarer sex will be the best
    strategy for parents as the rarer sex has higher average reproductive success
  • e.g. if twice as many mothers, each father has time as many offspring as each mother- means male fitness higher, so will have predisposition for producing son as causes more grandchildren
  • Once the sex ratio is equal, the advantage disappears and the population is in equilibrium
41
Q

Outline adaptive biases in birth sex ratio

A
  • local resource competition (Clark, 1978)- group living- if high resource competition, may be adaptive to produce dispersive sex so less competition
  • local resource enhancement (Komdeur et al, 1997)- e.g. if females help to raise offspring, may be bias due to payoff
42
Q

Outline individual variation in reproductive sex ratio

A
  • Intra-specific/group variation arises from
    variation in parental condition/rank and
    implications for offspring
  • Trivers & Willard Hypothesis- male reproductive variance > female reproductive variance (more reproductive skew in males as females limiting factor so difference between winners and losers higher as higher maximum)- males more competition
    -high quality parents ought to produce more sons, as high quality males have higher relative reproductive success than high quality females
  • note- some species in which daughters
    benefit more from maternal rank- e.g. matrilineal rank inheritance in baboons (female rank associated with number offspring)
43
Q

Outline potential adaptive sex determination

A
  • Gibson & Mace, 2003- rural Ethiopia (high nutritional and disease stress, health variation, 30% chronically malnourished)- mothers in top health quartile have more sons
  • Cameron & Dalerum, 2009- male resource holding predictive of wife number
44
Q

Outline potential proximate mechanisms of adaptive sex determination

A

-male bias in production of x- vs y-bearing sperm
-differential likelihood of successful fertilisation of x or y sperm
-differential likelihood of egg fertilised by x vs y sperm resulting in completed pregnancy
- numerous hormonal influences in m/f influential in these process- Navara (2013)
- F oestogen level > cervical mucosa viscosity > advantage for x
sperm
- M testosterone:gonadotrophin > affects ratio of x:y sperm production
- glucose levels may inhibit female blastocyst development more so than males

45
Q

Outline influences on tertiary sex ratio

A
  • Sex-ratio may also be altered after birth via parental behaviour e.g.
    infanticide/neglect/preferential treatment.
  • Inuit female infanticide rates estimated at ~20% (Smith & Smith 1994)
  • Male economic contribution and thus inclusive fitness contribution to parents much higher
46
Q

Outline strategies of biased investment (sex ratio)

A
  • Bereczeki & Dunbar, 1997- female biased parental investment adaptable strategy in Romanians in Hungary due to hypergyny
  • daughters (esp. in urban populations) produce more surviving grandchildren than sons because more likely to marry into wealthier native Hungarian population- means less offspring mortality risk
  • pay off more if have daughter as can marry up- higher survival if offspring farther non-romani
  • in the Romani population ether is F biased sex ratio at birth, daughters breastfed for 6 more months on average, and more investment in daughters education
47
Q

outline sex-biased inheritance

A
  • Tendency for male-biased inheritance (and co- occurrence with polygyny) because ROI on
    investment in sons > daughters
  • e.g. cattle inherited by sons as daughter will Mary regardless so giving cattle wont make difference (Hartung, 1982)
  • behaviours that causes people to repidce more descendants who also follow pattern will be naturally selected
48
Q

Outline paternity uncertainty

A
  • likely been an important selective force for men given the ubiquity of paternal investment in human populations
  • Non-paternity rates average ~3.3% - mixed sample, principally industrialised societies (Anderson 2006)
  • Paternity uncertainty may be higher in non-SIM social systems. E.g. Himba (Scelza)
  • Putative fathers may use phenotypic matching to guide investment decisions and avoid cuckoldry
49
Q

Outline phenotypic matching in paternal uncertainty

A

Platek et al, 2002:
* Photographs of same toddler morphed with five different adult faces including focal participant’s face
* Self-resemblance had substantially more impact on male than female participants’ willingness to invest
- e.g. 90% M chose self merged for adoption (sig p<.001), whereas F didn’t breach stat. significance; males said would punish 0% merged

50
Q

outline paternity uncertainty beyond direct fathers

A

Grandparental investment- predicted by:
1. Number of uncertainty links (Differential grandparental solicitude hypothesis; Euler & Wizel 1996)
2. Number of uncertainty links compared to other grandchildren (Preferential investment hypothesis; Laham et al. 2005)
3. Marginal genetic relatedness due to shared sex-chromosome (Sex chromosome selection hypothesis; Chrastil et al. 2006)
- sear & Mace, 2008- review of kin effects on child survival in 45 natural fertility populations- MGMs found to be most important relative besides mother- 70% MGM positive effect on child survival (highlights importance when no uncertainty)

51
Q

Outline variation in investment in stepchildren vs biological children

A
  • Marlowe (1999)- Hadza men nurture, hold, communicate and play significantly more with biological children than step-children; Men living with stepchildren produce 877Kcal/day versus 1901Kcal/day of men living with only biological children
  • cinderella effect- stepchildren are at increased risk of physical abuse and neglect
  • National homicide archive of Canada- data from 1974-1990- stepfathers more than 100X more likely than biological fathers to commit violent filicide
  • Data from Australia indicate >300 fold increased risk (Strang 1996)
  • Minimal confounding effects of other variables e.g. SES, family size, personality characteristics
52
Q

Human differences in cooperative breeding

A

Kramer, 2010:
- comparison to closest primate relative- children weaned at young age, reach sexual maturity late, more than twice as likely to survive reproductive age (Kaplan et al, 2000)- human children continue to be fed/clothed/sheltered/assisted
- male investment- typically economical
- sibling care
- influence of helpers- e.g. Hadza- children’s weight correlated with foraging effort of other mothers
- intergenerational resource flows
- unique in utilising many forms of offspring support complex sociality, food sharing, and long term reciprocal relationship

53
Q

Hamiltons rule in humans

A

Dunbar et al, 2015:
- analysis of support networks- found support for rule in humans
- Psychologically, emotional closeness serves as a proximate mechanism to direct human affiliative behavior- likely that people use cues of kinship, feelings of emotional closeness and expectations of reciprocity when differentiating among potential relationships
- 35% of ties within the support network were with neither relatives nor those that shared reproductive interests, close relatives were more likely to be ranked in primary positions, and that the degree of relatedness correlates with rank
- note from WEIRD populations

54
Q

factors mediating cooperation in humans

A

Haley & Kessler, 2005:
- social cues affected generosity in anonymous economic game
- eyespots substantially increased generosity, despite no differences in actual anonymity
- when using a computer displaying eyespots, almost twice as many participants gave money to their partners compared with the controls

55
Q
A