Biological Area Flashcards
1
Q
Biological Area
A
- Brain function, hormones, genetics
- Assumes that behaviour is due to dispositional/individual factors rather than situations or external factors
- Behaviour is caused by our brains and genetics, which are hereditary
- Humans are complex beings as hormones, genes and the central nervous system all interact with each other to cause behaviour
2
Q
Biological Strengths
A
- Deterministic: improves our understanding of the physiognomy of the brain and creates predictive power for behaviour
- Scientific: laboratory experiments are used to investigate mental processes and establish a cause and effect
3
Q
Biological Weaknesses
A
- Reductionist: human behaviour being due to biology alone gives a simplistic level of explanation for complex behaviour
- Ethnocentric: there are limitations to generalising findings to other cultures, as the studies are carried out within the western world
4
Q
Biological Studies
A
Sperry - Split Brain Study
Casey - Neural Correlates Of Delay Of Gratification
Blakemore & Cooper - Impact Of Early Visual Experience
Maguire - Taxi Drivers
5
Q
Sperry Context
A
- Our brains have a left a right hemisphere
6
Q
Sperry Aim
A
- To investigate what happens when the two halves of the brain are disconnected
- If the hemispheres perform differing functions and have their own memories and perceptions
7
Q
Sperry Method
A
- A quasi experiment as the IV of them having a split brain or not wasn’t directly manipulated by the researchers
- They completed laboratory experiments
8
Q
Sperry Sample
A
- 11 participants who had undergone a commisurotomy (separates the corpus callosum between the hemispheres) to help their epilepsy
9
Q
Sperry Procedure
A
- Presented with visual information by covering one eye and focusing on a fixed point
- On a projection screen they were presented with pictures on the left or right of the screen for 0.1 seconds
- Presented with tactile information by a gap under the screen so they couldn’t see their hands but could reach for objects
10
Q
Sperry Results
A
- Pictures first shown to the left visual field weren’t recognised when then shown to the right visual field
- Visual material in the right visual field could be described in speech and writing while visual material in the left visual field could be identified with the left hand only but not described in words
- When two objects were displayed e.g. case and key, and asked to draw what they saw with their left hand they drew what was on the left half of the screen (case) but said they’d drawn what was on the right half of the screen (key)
- Objects placed in the right hand could be described in speech and writing but when objects were placed in the left hand participants were unaware of the object in their hand
11
Q
Sperry Conclusion
A
- When the hemispheres are disconnected one half of the brain is unaware of what the other half is doing
- The left hemisphere is for speech and writing and it communicates the visual field and experiences of the right half of the body
- The right hemisphere cannot speak or write but non-verbally shows the mental processes in the left visual field and left half of the body
12
Q
Sperry Evaluation
A
- Method: strictly controlled experiment e.g. controls of the screen covering the hands and quick flash of the images helped to reveal the ‘lateralization of function of the two hemispheres (one side has a different role than the other). Also a quasi experiment
- Data: qualitatively reported what participants could and could not do which helps with depth an understanding but not objective summarising or comparison
- Ethics: informed consent was received, there was no deception or harm/stress caused to participants
- Validity: the sample was small as the condition is rare and lacks ecological validity as people with a severed corpus callosum still live normal lives but the experimenter knew this and simply wanted to study them under a controlled scientific setting
- Reliability: general trends were found in the brain function of split brain patients as similarities in participants imply reliable results
- Sample: it was a small sample so studies of the ‘abnormal brain’ may not be generalizable to the ‘normal brain’
- Ethnocentrism: brains are species-specific so the behaviour could be said to be applicable to everyone but cultural influences affect the development of our brain
13
Q
Casey Context
A
- Delay of gratification depends on cognitive control
- The inferior frontal gyrus is involved in cognitive control during delay of rewards whereas the ventral striatum is involved in ‘hot’ situations involving immediate reward and choices
14
Q
Casey Aim
A
- To investigate whether the ability to delay gratification as a child predicts the ability of adults to control impulses and does it predict sensitivity to alluring social cues
15
Q
Casey Method
A
- Longitudinal quasi experiment as being a high delayer or low delayer is naturally occurring
- Participants were followed from the age of 4 to their mid 40s