Bioethics Flashcards
Principal of Equipoise (6)
- Provides ethical basis for medical research that involves assigning patients to different treatment arms of a clinical trial
- Means that there’s genuine uncertainty in expert medical community over whether a treatment will be beneficial
- Applies also for off-label treatments performed before or during their required clinical trials
- As trial progresses, findings may provide sufficient evidence to convince investigator of intervention or drug’s efficacy
- Once a certain threshold of evidence is passed, there’s no longer genuine uncertainty about most beneficial treatment, so there’s an ethical imperative for investigator to provide superior intervention to all participants
- Some ethicists suggest investigators should only continue the study until they’re convinced that one of the treatments is better, other ethicists argue that the study should continue until evidence convinces the entire expert medical community
What is a double-blind study? (2)
- Both the subjects or participants and the researcher are blinded
- The researcher is unaware of who is receiving what treatment and the participants are unaware of the treatment they are receiving
Pros and cons of double-blind study (2)
- Pros: it tests for three groups (treatment, placebo, control), reduces experimental bias, results can be duplicated
- Cons: expensive, low representation, patients may respond negatively to drug or placebo
What is a randomised trial? (1)
- Study in which the participants are divided by chance into separate groups that compare different treatments or other interventions
Pros and cons of randomised trials (2)
- Pros: minimises bias, minimises confounding factors, statistical reliability
- Cons: results may not always mimic real life treatment situation, requires clinical equipoise, informed consent is impossible
What is a placebo? (2)
- An inactive substance that looks like the drug or treatment being tested
- Comparing results from the two groups suggests whether changes in the test group result from the treatment or occur by chance.
Purpose, Methods and Justification of Risks of Medical Care/Practice (3)
- Purpose: individualised care
- Methods: routine/established care
- Justification of risks: risks of diagnostics/treatments are justified by potential benefits to patients
Purpose, Methods and Justification of Risks of Medical/Clinical Research (3)
- Purpose: advance medical knowledge for society/generalisable knowledge for groups of patients
- Methods: randomisation, blinding, restrictive doses, tests to measure study outcomes
- Justification of risks: risks of discomfort or harm and/or without a prospect of benefit from participating are justified and anticipated by the knowledge to be gained
Ethical issues linked with Data Protection Act 1998 and General Data Protection Regulation 2018 (2)
- Confidentiality
- Anonymity
Ethical issues linked with Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, 2013 (1)
- 3 Rs (Reduce, Replace, Refine); Animal Welfare (high standards)
Ethical issues linked with Alder Hay Scandal, Human Tissue Act 2004 (1)
- Consent
Ethical issues linked with Medicines for Human Use Regulations 2004 & 2017 UK Policy Framework for Health & Social Care (2)
- Informed consent
- All clinical trials to have Research Ethics Committee (REC) approval
Utilitarianism (3)
- Asserts that right and wrong are best determined by focusing on outcomes of actions and choices
- A person’s rights are of less importance than the good outcomes of actions
- Underpins universal healthcare and public health approaches
Deontology (4)
- Distinguishes right from wrong, an action is intrinsically right or wrong
- Doesn’t consider outcomes/consequences of an action
- Basic interests & rights of a person are of primary importance
- Underpins universal human rights and duties
Principlism (2)
- ‘4 Principles’: Autonomy, Justice, Non-maleficence, Beneficence
- On occasion, ethical dilemmas are complex, and one or more of the four principles come into conflict with each other