bias and decision making 1 - rationality and uncertainty Flashcards

1
Q

define rationality

A

when decision making appears to be rational

it is a set of norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

norms with reasoning

A

rules of action or thought which define optimality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

rationality as a set of norms - 2 features (which can be errors)

A

coherence –> needs to be consistent across decisions

correspondence –> needs to correspond to reality, not a mismatch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

availability bias (+what error is this)

A

over-estimating the frequency of rare or memorable events

e.g. plane crashes

this is a correspondence error - mismatch between reality (environment) and response (belief about event frequency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

framing bias (+what error is this)

A

switching decision based on question framing

e.g. would you buy another ticket if you dropped it on the way to the cinema vs if you dropped £10 on the way to the cinema

coherence error - making a different decision based on the same outcomes - not consistency across decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the Linda problem

A

description of a woman and then were asked whether it is more likely she:
- works at a bank OR
- works at a bank and is an active feminist

rational response:
- option 1 must be more likely than option 2 as 2 is a subset of 1
- option 2 requires two things to be true whereas option 1 only needs one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what the Linda problem shows

A

most people say option 2 (she works at a bank and is a feminist)

this is in defiance of norms of laws of probability

this is making a conjunction fallacy –> an error in reasoning by assuming that the specific condition is more probable than one more general condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

conjunction fallacy

A

error in reasoning

assume that specific condition are more probable than a general condition

shown by the Linda problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

decision calculus (3 components)

A

make rational decisions using:

  • logics
  • probabilities
  • systematic consideration of all options
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 difficulties in making decisions

A
  1. the future is uncertain
  2. need to assess risks and benefits
  3. need to choose to increase chance of positive outcome
  4. need to use knowledge to estimate probabilities of future events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

rationality - probability based on value

A

expected value = value an investment will have in the future

good bet = expected value is greater than investment
bad bet = expected value is less than investment

rational choice = invest to maximise the expected value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

risk aversion

A

tendency to accept a sure outcome over a riskier one - even if the outcome results in less gain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

two components considered with decision calculus

A

value and utility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

expected utility theory - general idea

A

decision making method –> calculate the option with the highest expected utility

rational = choose option which maximises our utility

premise:

  • theory of decision under risk
  • each option leads to one set of outcomes
  • probability is known
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

value vs utility on line graphs against quantity

A

value = linear increase with quantity

utility = fast increase then curves and more plateaus with greater quantity

with utility - it gets to a point where you’ve had enough and so you don’t value it as highly as you did at the start

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

marginal utility

A

utility relative to how much of an item you have - if you have more you value additions to it less

17
Q

marginal utility + wealth

A

diminishing marginal utility of wealth:

as amount of money you have increases, each addition to it becomes less important

this is a subjective personal point of view

e.g. giving a billionaire vs a uni student an extra £1000 means different things to them

18
Q

value vs utility

A

utility is compressed with respect to value

e.g. you don’t enjoy 10 pizzas 10x as much as 1 pizza, but it does still cost 10x more than 1

value and cost are much more in line whilst utility is more about enjoyment/preference and how it contributes to wellbeing or satisfies desires

19
Q

value vs utility with coin flip example

A

option a - coin flips- head win £1000, tails win 0,
option b - no coin flip = £499

expected value:
b = £499
a = £500
–>but most still opt for b

utility attached to first £499 is greater than the additional £501

can measure utility using “willingness to pay”

according to Expected Utility Theory –> people should behave to maximise Expected Utility

20
Q

uncertainty affects expectation - pizza example

A

if you would pay £10 for 1 pizza

then how much would you pay for a 10% chance to win a pizza

or a pizza which had a 1/100 chance of making you sick

these add risk into the equation

21
Q

equation for expected utility

A

E = p*U

E = expected utility
p = probability
U = utility

e.g. expected utlity of a bet with a 50% chacne of a £40 pay off –> E = 0.5*40 –> E = 20 –> should take the bet if E is higher than investment according to expected utility theory

22
Q

equation for expected utility with multiple options

A

E = p1U1 + p2U2 etc…

E = expected utility
p = probability
U = utility

e.g.
a £15 bet with a 20% chance of paying £50 and a 10% chance of paying £100
investment = £15
E = 20
therefore should take the bet as E > investment

23
Q

the effect of uncertainty

A

need to understand probability distributions

e.g. if somethings is probable good, there could still be a small chance it goes bad

can picture this as curves on a graph with high and low utility on the x axis

24
Q

loss aversion and prospect theory

A

bias in decision making

if there is guaranteed loss –> people opt for option where loss may or may not happen rather than optimal utility

aversion to guaranteed loss

e.g. having £100 and loosing £50 feels worse than having £0 and gaining £50 even though result is the same

e.g. would you accept coin toss when heads = +£1500 and tails = -£1000

innate motive to prefer avoiding losses rather than achieving similar gains

feel the pain of loss more than the pleasure of an equivalent gain