bias and decision making 1 - rationality and uncertainty Flashcards
define rationality
when decision making appears to be rational
it is a set of norms
norms with reasoning
rules of action or thought which define optimality
rationality as a set of norms - 2 features (which can be errors)
coherence –> needs to be consistent across decisions
correspondence –> needs to correspond to reality, not a mismatch
availability bias (+what error is this)
over-estimating the frequency of rare or memorable events
e.g. plane crashes
this is a correspondence error - mismatch between reality (environment) and response (belief about event frequency)
framing bias (+what error is this)
switching decision based on question framing
e.g. would you buy another ticket if you dropped it on the way to the cinema vs if you dropped £10 on the way to the cinema
coherence error - making a different decision based on the same outcomes - not consistency across decisions
the Linda problem
description of a woman and then were asked whether it is more likely she:
- works at a bank OR
- works at a bank and is an active feminist
rational response:
- option 1 must be more likely than option 2 as 2 is a subset of 1
- option 2 requires two things to be true whereas option 1 only needs one
what the Linda problem shows
most people say option 2 (she works at a bank and is a feminist)
this is in defiance of norms of laws of probability
this is making a conjunction fallacy –> an error in reasoning by assuming that the specific condition is more probable than one more general condition
conjunction fallacy
error in reasoning
assume that specific condition are more probable than a general condition
shown by the Linda problem
decision calculus (3 components)
make rational decisions using:
- logics
- probabilities
- systematic consideration of all options
4 difficulties in making decisions
- the future is uncertain
- need to assess risks and benefits
- need to choose to increase chance of positive outcome
- need to use knowledge to estimate probabilities of future events
rationality - probability based on value
expected value = value an investment will have in the future
good bet = expected value is greater than investment
bad bet = expected value is less than investment
rational choice = invest to maximise the expected value
risk aversion
tendency to accept a sure outcome over a riskier one - even if the outcome results in less gain
two components considered with decision calculus
value and utility
expected utility theory - general idea
decision making method –> calculate the option with the highest expected utility
rational = choose option which maximises our utility
premise:
- theory of decision under risk
- each option leads to one set of outcomes
- probability is known
value vs utility on line graphs against quantity
value = linear increase with quantity
utility = fast increase then curves and more plateaus with greater quantity
with utility - it gets to a point where you’ve had enough and so you don’t value it as highly as you did at the start