Behavioural Approach To Treating Phobias - Systematic Densensitisation And Flooding Flashcards
What are the three AO3 PEELS to evaluate systematic densensitisation as a behavioural approach to treating phobias?
RTS - spider phobia
Weakness - less appropiate as it requires motivation and commitment
Strength - more appropiate as indv has high control
P
(RTS - spider phobia)
RTS effectiveness of SD - conducted by a researcher.
E
They followed up approx 40 ppl who had SD for spider phobias in three 45 min sessions using gradual exposure
E
They found that at both 3 months and 33 months after treatment, SD group was less fearful than control group who was treated with therapy that didnt use exposure to phobic stimulus
L
Therefore suggesting that reassociating a phobia with relaxation thru SD is an effective behavioural treatment for phobias
P
(Less appropiate as it requires motivation + commitment)
However, despite there being evidence of SD being effective, it could be argued SD may not be appropriate for all patients as it requires motivation and commitment
E
- this is bc patients must attend sessions over a long period of time and be gradually exposed to situations that cause anx
- this may cause patients to stop attending therapy, if this happens then therapy is ineffective and anx will return
E
This is unlike drug therapy which requires little motivation and commitment from patients as they only have to take a tablet to reduce anx they feel
L
Therefore, limiting appropiateness of SD
P
(More appropriate as patients have high control over therapy)
Strength - more appropiate behavioural therapy as patient has high control over their own therapy
E
This is bc they create their own hierachy of anx with therapist and be gradually exposed to phobic stimulus, only moving on when theyre relaxed
E
- this is unlike flooding which can be traumatic for some patients as theyre immediately exposed to most feared situation, causing high anx levels
- meaning patients prefer SD as many drop out or say no to flooding treatment
L
Therefore - more appropiate treatment
What are the two AO3 PEELS to evaluate flooding as a behavioural treatment of phobias?
Strength - highly cost effective
Weakness - unethical treatment
P
(Highly cost effective)
Strength - highly cost effective way to treat a phobia
E
- therapy is effective but not expensive
- as flooding can work in 1 session due to immediate exposure and extinction of phobia
- unlike SD which could take 10 sessions for the same result as it uses gradual exposure to phobic stimulus
E
- therefore flooding is more cost effective for NHS to use
- could benefit economy as more ppl would be treated for phobias in less time using fewer resources
L
Therefore flooding may be a more appropriate therapy to use in real world
P
(Unethical treatment)
However, others would argue flooding is not an appropiate treatment for phobias as a limitation is that it may be seen as an unethical treatment
E
- this is bc patient is immediately exposed to most feared phobic stimulus for 2-3 hours which may cause indv to experience extreme anx
- although full informed consent is gained from patients, SD could be seen as a more ethical treatment as it gradually exposes patients to phobic stimulus at their own rate
E
- it was found patients and therapists rated flooding significantly more stressful treatment than SD, therefore due to this trauma, drop out rates are higher for flooding
L
Therefore, reducing appropiateness and effectiveness of flooding