Basic overzicht IR theories Flashcards
Realism
Core beliefs
self-interested states compete for power and security
realism
key actors in international relations
states, which behave similarly regardless of their type of government
realism main instruments
military power and state diplomacy
realism
theory’s intelectual blind spots
doesn’t account for progress and change in international relations or understanding that legitimacy can be a source of military power
realism
what it explains about the post 9/11 world
why the US responded aggressively to terrorist attacks: the inability of international institutions to restrain military superiority
realism
what it fails to explain about the post 9/11 world
the failure of smaller powers to military balance the US
the importance of non-state actors such as Al Qaeda
intense US focus on democratization
liberalism core beliefs
spread of democracy, global economic ties and international organizations will strenghten peace
liberalism key actors in IR
states, internatinoal institutions and commercial interests
liberalism main instruments
international institutions and global commerce
Liberalisms intellectual spots
fails to understand that democratic regimes survive only if they safeguard military power and security
some liberals forget that transitions to democracy are sometimes violent
what liberalism explains about the post 9/11 world
why spreading democracy has become such an integral part of current US international security strategy
what liberalism fails to explain about the post 9/11 world
why the US has failed to work with other democracies through internatinoal organizations
idealism/constructivism core beliefs
internatinoal politcs is shaped by persuasive ideas collective values, culture and social identities
idealism/constructivism key actors in ir
promotors of new ideas, transnational activist networks, nongovernmental organizations
idealism/constructivism main instruments
ideas and values
idealism/constructivism intellectual blindspots
doesn’t explain which power structures and social conditions allow for changes in values
idealism/constructivism what it explains about the post 9/11 world
increasing role of polemics about values, the importance of transnational political networks
idealism/constructivism fails to explain about the post 9/11 world
why human rights abuses continue despite intense activism for humanitarian norms and efforts for international justice
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and realism
- self-interested character of elites and states
- centrality of power
but postcolonial/decolonial
- system as hierarchical and imperal rather than anarchic and sovereign
- power as much more multifaceted
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and liberalism
agree that cooperation is possible and durable
but decolonialism/postcolonialism
cooperation is only generally among developed/civilized states for the purposes of securing their privileges
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and marxism
capitalism is a major organizing structure in world politics + its tendencies are exploitative and immiserating
but:
decolonialism/postcolonialism
emphasize roles of racialization and colonial expansion in determining the character and pattern of exploitation
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and feminism
patriarchy is a major element in structuring world politics
but postcolonialism/decolonialism:
gender intersects with race, class and nationality in producing structures of power/entitlement
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and constructivism
world is socially constructed in important ways
but postcolonialism and decolonialism emphasize the asymmetric, colonial and purposive character of these constructions
similarities + differences postcolonial and decolonial and poststructuralism
- knowledge and power intertwine
- idea of meaning as being intertextually produced
but decolonialism/postcolonialism
- emphasize material as well as discursive character of oppression
- importance of strategic essentialism in advancing critical claims