Bandura's Study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

.What was the aim of Bandura 1961?

A

To investigate the mechanisms of social learning theory to see whether things learned in one context can be repeated in different ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the sample of Bandura 1961?

A

-72 participants (half male, half female).
-Aged 37 to 69 months
-All from same nursery
–3 adults involved- one male model, one female model and one female experimenter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the IV and DV for 1961?

A

IV- sex of child, sex of model, behaviour of model.
DV- behaviour of the child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the controls for 1961?

A

-Aggressiveness using matched pairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the three experimental conditions?

A

-Aggressive model
-Non-aggressive model
-Control/no model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the procedure for Bandura 1961 and 1963?

A

Modelling- each child exposed to one condition. In aggressive the model beat the bobo doll, punched and kicked it. In non-aggressive the model did nothing.

Aggression arousal-Children taken to different room to play with toys and after 2 mins the toys were taken away. Children became annoyed and angry.

Test of delayed imitation- Children led to room with toys some aggressive ( bobo doll, mallet) and non-aggressive (paper, crayons). Child was observed through a one way mirror. Behaviour recorded every 5 seconds for 20 mins.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the results of Bandura 1961?

A

-Aggressive models created more aggression imitation (25.8 vs 1.5)
-Males more aggressive than females (25.8 vs 12.4)
-Non-aggressive model inhibited aggression (1.5 vs 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the conclusions from Bandura 1961?

A

-Not all behaviour is learnt through reinforcement, can be learnt through observation and later reproduced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the aim of Bandura 1963?

A

To test the idea that watching filmed aggression might be cathartic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the sample for Bandura 1963?

A

-96 children (half male, half female).
-Aged 3-5
-All from Stanford university nursery school- opportunity.
-Matched on aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the 4 conditions in 1963?

A

-Live model
-Filmed model +cartoon cat (cathartic conditions)
-Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the results from Bandura 1963?

A

-Control groups half as aggressive as other groups.
-No significant difference between other conditions.
-Control showed 54 acts of aggression.
-Live model shoed 83 acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the conclusion form Bandura 1963?

A

-Children will imitate filmed aggression in the same way as live aggression role models.
-Watching filmed violence is not cathartic as children became more aggressive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the aim from Bandura 1965?

A

-To see if vicarious reinforcement had an effect on children’s behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the sample from Bandura 1965?

A

-66 nursery students (half male half female).
-All from Stanford university nursery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the 3 conditions in Bandura 1965?

A

-Model rewarded for aggressive behaviour.
-Model punished for aggressive behaviour.
-No consequences/ control.

17
Q

What was the procedure for Bandura 1965?

A

-Taken to wait in a surprise playroom and watched a 5 min show.
-Model arrived and did 4 behaviours - sat on bobo and punched it, hit bobo on head with mallet, kicked bobo around room, threw rubber balls at it.
-In first condition model rewarded by getting a drink and sweets and being called a ‘strong champion’.
-In second condition when punished adult came in calling model ‘big bully’ , sat on the model and hit him with a rolled up newspaper.
-Then kids taken into another room with other objects such as a bobo doll, dolls and balls. For 10 mins they were observed every 5 seconds for 10 mins by 2 observers.

18
Q

What was the results for Bandura 1965?

A

-Showed children are more likely to imitate behaviour if model is positively reinforced.
-Boys showed more imitated responses than girls.
-Younger children copied physical aggression more than verbal.

19
Q

What is the conclusions form Bandura 1965?

A

-Children are more likely to imitate the behaviour if the role model is rewarded and less likely if they are punished.
-Girls more restrained by threat of punishment than boys.

20
Q

Why is the study not generalisbale?

A

-Children all of similar ages so results are not applicable to other people.
-Ethnocentric.
-Shared characteristics (nursey attended).

21
Q

Why is the study generalisable?

A

All include male and female participants so sample is diverse.

22
Q

Why is the study relaiable?

A

Standardised procedures (e.g models actions) so can be repeated.
-High inter-rater reliability with more than 1 observer.

23
Q

How is the study valid?

A

-High ecological validity in nursery so can be applied to real life.
-Matched pairs used for aggression levels so less ppt variables.
-Covert observation so less demand characteristics.

24
Q

Why is the study not valid?

A

-Unusual task so low mundane realism.

25
Q

What is the ethical issues with the study?

A

-Protection from harm- shown aggressive behaviours and imitated, may distress some participants.
-Informed consent- children too young to understand.