Ayer Logical Postivism Verification ContinueD Flashcards
What other verification does AJ Ayer develop ?
Verification in practise and principle
For Ayer: verification in practise and principle , what should we use ?
We should use the weaker version of the original version of the verification principle
A.J Ayer verification in practise and principle
what is the weaker approach to the argument called ?
Verification in Principle
A.J Ayer verification in practise and principle
Why did Ayer prefer the weaker form of the argument: verification in principle
- more flexible
- adaptable as by saying verification needs to be in principle, we know how statements in principle can be tested empirically
A.J Ayer verification in practise and principle
Why does Ayer prefer the weaker version : verification principle and for it to be tested empirically
Can be tested Not right now but instead day what you CAN do to test it in principle
What is the strength of verification in principle ?
More accommodating and means any statement can be considered as meaningful
A.J Ayer verification in practise and principle
Verification in principle : quote example
‘Intelligent life else where in the galaxy’
Verification in principle :
If you used verification in practise for the statement ‘intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy’ why would this be meaningless
It would be meaningless because you cannot see the intelligent life right now in the galaxy BUT verification in principle WOULDsay it is meaningful because it is possible for you can test it empirically one day WITH **SENSE AND EXPERIENCE **
A.J Ayer verification in practise and principle
What is the stronger version of the verification principle ?
Verification in practise
What is verification in practise: stronger version ?
- If there is a direct sense or experience with tautology to support the statement
- need to be able to see if for yourself right here and now
- more narrow approach to meaningful language
Another argument that Ayer developed ?
Verification principle and God language
“God exist”
Verification principle and God language
What does Ayer think about this statement “God exist”
That this statement is not analytical (true by definition) or synthetic (empirically verifiable) even in principle
Verification principle and God language
“God exist”
What does Ayer being an atheist link to this stamenent of “God exists”
Because he was an aethist, so when we die we die so no life after death so verification needs to occur within this lifetime as no empircal proof of a transcendent God in this lifetime
Verification principle and God language
“God exist”
So why did Ayer see the stamenent of God exist as meaningless ?
- can neither be true or false
- nonsense to even consider
- does not meet the verification principle and we cannot prove this
Verification principle and God language
“God exist”
Key statement by Ayer
”No stamenent that purports to describe the nature of transcendent God can possess any literal significance” (AJ AYER)