Autocracy and dictatorship Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by the term totalitarianism?

A

A system of government which requires complete subservience to the state. It is commonly run by a dictatorship, and all opposition is crushed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a dictatorship?

A

A government ran by person who has total power of a country. This contrasts to a democratic system, where people have the ability to openly vote for their leader. Dictators often obtain power through force, and wield power through strict laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why can dictatorships be thought largely as a 20th and 21st century phenomenon?

A

The 19th century was dominated by global empires, and have little political space for dictators. The modern states were varying constitutional monarchies, with imperial possessions- ruled differently to their metropole. The breakup of these empires leave space for dictatorships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the break down of empires mean for colonies?

A

Left small states that usually weren’t economically viable. State borders that made sense at the time of intense competition no longer made sense to create viable, self-governing independent nations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Paul Collier argue about landlocked countries in Africa?

A

Believes that these landlocked countries and those with a heavy dependence on exploiting natural resources are at a greater risk of becoming unviable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the Cold War do to attitudes on dictatorships?

A

Truman doctrine- USA will provide political, economic, and military assistance to democratic nations under threat from authoritarian forces

Kirkpatrick thesis- right wing authoritarian governments are more amenable to democratic reform that left wing totalitarian states e.g. Mobutu in the Republic of Congo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did the PRI stay in power for 71 years?

A

They consistently won elections, but changed the constitution in order to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does longevity in power mean it is a dictatorship?

A

No- the Japanese Liberal Democrats and the Swedish Socialist party were both in power for roughly the same period of 45 years. but had they lost an election they would have lost power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give some examples of how dictators maintain power.

A

Manipulate the press, military force, change the constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is military rule so frequent in developing countries?

A

The army offers the most viable alternative to a civilian state in terms of expertise, experience, cohesion, institutional structure, and nationalist credentials. They made up for what the imperial powers did not leave. They often promise to withdraw after establishing stability e.g. Latin America - Pinochet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Between 1946 and 2000, how many country years of democratic government were there in Africa?

A

189

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why might African dictatorships not seem wholly typical?

A

African dictators often have elections, legislatures, and organised political parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the four traps that Paul Collier has identified that cause countries to fall behind and fall apart?

A
  • the conflict trap
  • the natural resources trap
  • landlocked with bad neighbours
  • bad governance in a small country
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Are there advantages to dictatorships?

A

Tendency to grow faster than democracies in the early phases of modernisation and development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Ehret explain the idea of political religion?

A

Movements such as fascism cannot be explained merely through ideology, rather the term religion would be more accurate. Dictatorships are congruent with radical followers, the use of symbols and ceremonies. They encompass mass populations, and reinforce social solidarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does political religion do for dictators?

A

gives dictators the agency to gain total control. Thus, this affiliation of religion and politics has helped strengthen the emergence of dictatorships in society.

17
Q

What does the idea of the West and the Rest have to do with the emergence of dictatorships?

A

The west was seen as a hegemonic mirror that the rest should correspond to. The west was illustrated as the modernised ambition: with freedom of speech, democracy and civil freedoms. However, this ideology ultimately influenced the need for these nonviable continents to match, or even, try to overtake their Western opponents. In turn, dictatorial regimes were needed to conduct this modernisation

18
Q

What has been happening to overall global freedom?

A

There has been a net decline in aggregate scores of freedom, over the past 11 years e.g. Hong Kong has reduced freedoms because of the encroachment of central Chinese government

19
Q

What does Hannah Arendt believe are the origins of totalitarianism?

A

These ideologies appeared to offer the total revelation of the world. Born out of a crisis of modernity, strong desire to catch up.

20
Q

Why might political religion be criticised?

A

It suggests they were not sensitive to political phases. Also, they apply very well, but to only three European dictatorships.

21
Q

Why might Donald Trump be considered as an accidental dictator?

A

A monopoly of the media, or criticising news that he doesn’t like as ‘fake news’. Using social media to push an agenda and blur the lines between what is real, and to hide his mistakes. The goal of these leaders is to confuse both their supporters and their detractors so that the former perceives their deceit as political aptitude while the latter is unable to point to real criticism