Augustine on human nature Flashcards
Genesis 2-3
Genesis 2-3 humans before the fall lived in the imagio dei in a harmonious relationship with God. God-given free will comes with the ability to either act in selfish love (cupidas) or selfless love (cartias) Two loves are harmonious with one another and enables humans to live in a perfect friendship with God.
The Divided will
However human hubris to be like God demonstrates how humans used their free will to turn away from God and towards evil. Augustine argues that because the will has been used for evil it causes the will to become divided and Cartias and Cupidas are no longer in harmony
FOR - Paul
Paul Romans 7 where he describes how the desire to do good is overcome by the desire to do evil
FOR - Evidence in society
Hobbes
Implications of the divided will (Augustine) – evil desires become intrinsic to human nature. Evidenced within society as humans are observed to be greedy and lustful, there wouldn’t be such a need for extensive legalistic structures if people could live harmoniously. Hobbes “Humans are selfish”
FOR - God Sovereignty
Doesn’t undermine God sovereignty as it was Adam and Eve’s own free will that they chose to sin and turn away
AGAINST - Bible stories
Biblical stories such as the Good Samaritan useless as humans would not have the capability of morality and learning if all corrupted by sin. This would suggest that God is ignorant to sin and thus would be contradictory to a perfect God’s nature.
AGAINST - no point to morality
If all are incapable of ever choosing the good then there would be no point to morality as humans could never do good. Negates the point of free will as we are trapped always choosing our evil desires
AGAINST - Create the garden in the first place
Why would God place the tree in the Garden in the first place? Why would God create humans to have the potential to do evil it’s as if he wanted them to fall
KEY TERM - God’s grace
Divided will can be restored through God’s grace. As Christ’s sacrifice on the cross meant that he took the consequences of sin into his own body. However, whilst some are saved from sin it is only those that God has predestined (chosen by God-elect) that can be restored whilst the rest are left to suffer in sin
FOR - Optimistic
to say this is pessimistic is to undermine God’s sovereignty and his ability to decide. Indeed, even though not everyone will be saved from sin, it is through God’s omnibenevolence that a few humans do, which is arguably optimistic as we are not all eternally left to suffer
AGAINST - pelagius
Pelagius – Augustine and this view to pessimistic as the fall did not destroy human potential to good but humans have the requirement to be good.
FOR - Pelagius misleads
Weak and potentially misleading criticism as lessens the significance of Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross as he would no longer be dying with the intention to allow some people to be saved from sin and their will to be restored
FOR - Pelagius ignores
Pelagius also ignores the vast amount of sin that can be empirically observed within society. Augustine could argue with his own experience, written in his book Confessions, of when he stole for the pleasure of sinning
FOR - Pelagius dictatorial
the emphasis on a human to have a requirement to be good could lead to dictatorial systems that emphasise what they perceive is best for morality, which takes the emphasis away from God.
KEY TERM - The Humanitarian principle
Pinker argues that humans become good simply by prioritizing the interests of others