Audit Section 4 Flashcards
A client’s fixed asset experienced a significant impairment loss but the client refuses to record the impairment loss in the financial statements.
This is a material departure from GAAP that is neither necessary nor justified by the client. When a misstatement is material but not pervasive, the auditor should issue a qualified opinion.
Refrigerators Inc. changed its estimate for warranty expense from $110 per refrigerator sold in the prior year to $150 per refrigerator sold. This change is properly accounted for and disclosed in the financial statements. The auditor of Refrigerators Inc.
should issue a
The auditor should express an unmodified opinion as the financial statements are fairly stated. A change in warranty expense “estimate” is a change in estimate. Changes in estimate do not require an emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
Under U.S. auditing standards, the auditor expresses an opinion on the financial statements’ conformity with GAAP in the Opinion section and the Management’s Responsibility section that the management is responsible for
the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
An auditor reporting on the audit of financial statements of an issuer should indicate in the Basis for Opinion section that the engagement was conducted in accordance with
PCAOB standards, and should refer to GAAP in the Opinion on the Financial Statements section.
The auditor’s responsibility paragraph of the unmodified opinion audit report explicitly states that an audit includes
identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement and designing and performing audit procedures responsive to those risks.
When circumstances indicate that a financial presentation in accordance with U.S. GAAP would be misleading, a departure from U.S. GAAP is
permissible. In such cases, the auditor should issue an unmodified opinion because the financial statements are not materially misstated.
Is a basic element of the auditor’s report under U.S. auditing standards
An audit includes evaluating the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management.
“Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.” The statement is
Consistent is implicit in the auditor’s report, and will be explicitly mentioned in an emphasis-of-a-matter paragraph only if there are issues with consistency.
An auditor’s responsibility to express an opinion on the financial statements of a nonissuer under U.S. auditing standards is
Explicitly represented in the Auditor’s Responsibility paragraph.
The auditor obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence and concludes that misstatements are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
best describes when an auditor should express an adverse opinion
The opinion paragraph in an adverse opinion should state that
in the auditor’s opinion, because of the significance of the matters) discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not present fairly…
An adverse opinion is issued when the financial statements are
not presented in accordance with GAAP.
The auditor would explain to the client that in order for the entity’s financial statements to be in conformity with GAAP, there must be
adequate disclosures of all material matters including all financial statements and the supporting footnotes. As a result, the auditor would tell Zag that without adequate disclosure of the entity’s cash flows, the audit report would have to be issued with a qualified or adverse audit opinion.
Inadequate disclosure of a material related party transaction would result in a
qualified or adverse opinion.
“In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion section of our report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not present fairly the financial position…” is an example of
An adverse opinion
The auditor should disclose the substantive reasons for expressing an
adverse opinion in a separate Basis for Adverse Opinion section following the Opinion section.
If management does not provide reasonable justification for a change in accounting principles
the auditor would issue a qualified or adverse opinion, depending on materiality.
An auditor may express a qualified or disclaimer of opinion when
due to a scope limitation, the auditor is unable to perform all the tests necessary to complete an audit. Management’s refusal to permit inquiry of the attorneys generally will result in a disclaimer of opinion or withdrawal from the audit.
If a company issues financial statements that purport to present financial position and results of operations but omits the related statement of cash flows, the auditor will normally conclude that the omission requires
qualification of the opinion. Which is an auditor’s opinion that the financials are fairly presented, with the exception of a specified area.
Inadequate disclosure of material information is a departure from GAAP and may result in either a
qualified or adverse opinion, depending on materiality.
The failure of the financial statements to contain adequate disclosure of related party transactions, or other required disclosures, would result in a
qualified or adverse opinion, not a disclaimer of opinion.
When a qualified opinion results from an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the situation should be described in a
Basis for Qualified Opinion section following the Qualified Opinion section and should be referred to in the Qualified Opinion section. The scope limitation is not mentioned in the Management’s Responsibility paragraph.
Client-imposed restrictions of scope such as those caused by inadequate records would cause the auditor
to choose between issuing a disclaimer of opinion and a qualified opinion.
Since the CPA could not determine whether the suspected illegal bribes were material to the financial statements, or whether senior management was involved in the scheme, Morris should
disclaim an opinion on the financial statements.
When an auditor qualifies his opinion because of a scope limitation, the wording in the opinion paragraph should indicate that
the qualification pertains to the possible effects on the financial statements and not to the scope limitation itself.
1) A disclaimer of opinion means that the auditor was 2) An unjustified change in accounting principle could result in a
1) unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a reasonable basis for an opinion, thus, no opinion is expressed.
2) material misstatement of the financial statements that would result in a qualified or adverse opinion, not a disclaimer of opinion.
Refusal of the client’s attorney to respond to inquiry is an example of
a scope limitation. The auditor must consider the impact of the scope limitation on the audit opinion to be issued.
Due to the significance of the inventory balance, the effects of undetected misstatements could be both
material and pervasive. In this situation, U.S. GAAS allows the auditor to consider whether to withdraw or disclaim an opinion on the financial statements.
Restrictions on the scope of the audit, such as the
timing of the work, the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, or an inadequacy in the accounting records, may require the auditor to qualify or disclaim an opinion. Inability to obtain audited financial statements supporting the entity’s investment in a foreign subsidiary is such a restriction on the scope of the audit.
An auditor may issue a qualified opinion (or a disclaimer, depending on materiality) when
there is a lack of sufficient appropriate audit evidence, or when there are restrictions on the scope of the audit.
When an auditor is not independent with respect to an entity, only a
disclaimer of opinion may be issued.
Management’s refusal to furnish written representations is a significant client imposed restriction on
the scope of an audit, ordinarily warranting a disclaimer of opinion.
The refusal of a client’s attorney to respond to an audit inquiry letter is an example of
a scope limitation. The auditor must use professional judgment in determining whether that scope limitation warrants a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
If a contingent liability is probable, but not estimable, and it is disclosed in the footnotes, the auditor should
issue an unmodified opinion.
An auditor would add an other-matter paragraph when
current period financial statements are audited and presented in comparative form with compiled or reviewed financial statements from the prior period or in comparative form with prior period financial statements that were not audited, reviewed, or compiled.
An unjustified accounting change may cause the auditor to issue a
qualified or adverse opinion. A material weakness must be reported to management and those charged with governance, but would not be disclosed in an emphasis-of-matter paragraph added to an otherwise unmodified opinion.
The auditor’s standard report implies that the auditor is satisfied that the
comparability of financial statements between periods has not been materially affected by changes in accounting principles and that such principles have been consistently applied between or among periods. Since the auditor has gathered sufficient evidence about consistency, no reference need be made in the report.
The title and sentences represent an emphasis-of-matter paragraph. An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is required when the
financial statements are prepared in accordance with an applicable special purpose framework, such as the cash basis of accounting. Note that an emphasis of matter paragraph may use the heading of “Emphasis of Matter” or any other appropriate heading.
Following is an example of an appropriate emphasis-of-matter paragraph: “As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the company changed its method of accounting for income taxes in X2.”
The paragraph should refer to the note in the financial statements that discusses the change in detail.
An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is required to describe a
justified change in accounting principle that is material to the financial statements.
A change in accounting estimate (such as a change in the useful life of a depreciable asset) is accounted for
prospectively and does not affect the comparability of financial statements between periods. Because the auditor’s unmodified opinion implies that consistency exists, no modification to the report is necessary.
A justified lack of consistency caused by a material change in GAAP between periods would be reported in
an emphasis-of-matter paragraph. Under these circumstances, the auditor issues an unmodified opinion.
An other-matter paragraph refers to matters other than those
presented or disclosed in the financial statements that are relevant to the users’ understanding. If the auditor has been engaged to report on more than one set of financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with different report frameworks, the other-matter paragraph may be necessary.
Details concerning the results of audit procedures (such as the results of confirmation of receivables) generally
do not appear in the footnotes.
If a component auditor does not meet the independence requirements that are relevant to a group audit of a nonissuer’s financial statements, then the group engagement team should first attempt to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence relating to the financial information of the component without making reference to or using the work of the component auditor.
“Those statements were audited by other auditors, whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for X Company, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.”
Such a statement is included in the Opinion section of the auditor’s report.
When the group engagement auditor accepts responsibility for the work performed by a component auditor, the group engagement partner must contact
the component auditor and review the audit program and working papers pertaining to the component.
Under U.S. GAAS, if, among other requirements, the group engagement partner is satisfied as to the
independence and the professional reputation of the component auditor, the group engagement partner may express an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole without making reference to the audit of the component auditor.
When the group auditor decides not to make reference to the audit of a component auditor, the group auditor assumes responsibility for the
work of the component auditor and should determine the type of work to be performed on the financial information of the component. If the component is significant, the component should be audited by the group engagement team or the component auditor.2
If the auditor discovers a material inconsistency in other information accompanying the audited financial statements, the financial statements do not require revision, and the client refuses to eliminate or revise the inconsistency, the auditor should communicate the matter with those charged with governance and then consider
1) revising the report to include a separate “Other Information” section describing the material inconsistency,
2) withholding the use of the report, or
3) withdrawing from the engagement and consulting with legal counsel.
If the quarterly data required by SEC Regulation S-K have been omitted, the auditor’s report must include a
statement indicating that the company has not presented such data.
The auditor should read the “other information” in a client’s document containing audited financial statements to
determine that it is consistent with the audited financial statements.
The auditor would not perform a review or express negative assurance on
supplementary information required by GAAP.
The auditor should perform limited procedures on required
supplementary information accompanying the financial statements. In addition, the auditor’s report on the financial statements should include a separate section with the heading, “Supplementary Information.”
The audit report for nonissuers should include a
separate section with the heading “Required Supplementary Information” when reporting on required supplementary information that is presented with the basic financial statements.
The auditor should inquire of management regarding
the purpose of the supplementary information and the criteria used to prepare the information. This is done in addition to the procedures performed during the audit of the financial statements.
For additional supplementary information required by the FASB, the auditor should apply certain
limited procedures to the information and add a separate section with the heading “Required Supplementary Information” to the financial statement audit report.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support an opinion on the supplemental information, the auditor should
disclaim an opinion on the supplemental information. In those situations, the auditor’s report on the supplemental information should describe the reason for the disclaimer and state that the auditor is unable to and does not express an opinion on the supplemental information.
A report on other comprehensive basis of accounting (“OCBOA”) financial statements should include an
emphasis-of-matter paragraph stating the basis, referring to the footnote that describes it, and indicating that it is a non-
GAAP basis.
If information accompanying the basic financial statements has been subjected to auditing procedures, the auditor may include in the auditor’s report on the financial statements an opinion that the accompanying information is fairly stated
All material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
When reporting on financial statements prepared in conformity with a basis of accounting other than GAAP, the auditor should include an
emphasis-of-matter paragraph that states that the special purpose framework is a basis of accounting other than GAAP.
When reporting on financial statements prepared on the same basis of accounting used for income tax purposes, the auditor should include in the report a
paragraph that states that the income tax basis of accounting is a basis of accounting other than GAAP. Examples of an appropriate title for this paragraph are “Emphasis of Matter” or “Basis of Accounting.”
Other comprehensive basis of accounting financial statements include financial statements prepared in accordance with a
regulatory basis of accounting. An income statement prepared in accordance with a regulatory basis of accounting could be entitled “Statement of income-regulatory basis.”
Non-GAAP statements should be suitably titled. For example, instead of an income statement, an appropriate cash basis financial statement title might be
“statement of revenues collected and expenses paid.”
IFRS (the standards promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board) and GAAP (the standards promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board) are general purpose frameworks. Special purpose frameworks include:
- Cash basis and modified cash basis
- Tax basis
- Regulatory basis
- Contractual basis
- Other basis
A description of how the income tax basis differs from GAAP should be included in the
notes to the financial statements.
The auditor would not indicate in his/her report an opinion as to whether the
method of accounting used is appropriate.
Financial statements prepared in accordance with a comprehensive basis of accounting other than GAAP that are not suitably titled require a
qualified opinion with a basis for modification paragraph.
PCAOB standards surrounding internal control apply only to
audits of issuers.
In an audit of an issuer, the auditor must provide an opinion on
1) Financial Statements
2) The effectiveness of internal control
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the chief executive officer is required to
certify (or sign off) on all the other items, but is not required to certify the financial expertise of the audit committee. The expected financial expertise of the audit committee is typically verified by the entity’s board.
In order for an auditor to audit and report on a nonissuer’s internal control, management must
present its written assessment about the effectiveness of internal control.
If a service auditor is unable to obtain a written assertion from the service organization’s management regarding its system and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of controls, it would be most appropriate for the auditor to
withdraw from the engagement unless prohibited by law.
When planning an audit of the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control in an integrated audit of a nonissuer, a practitioner would be least likely to
consider the evaluation of the operating effectiveness of the controls. The evaluation of the operating effectiveness of controls occurs after the planning stage.
The auditor’s conclusion on the operating effectiveness of a given control is not a role of
the risk assessment process. The auditor’s conclusion on the operating effectiveness of internal control occurs after the risk assessment process.
1) Entity level controls include
2) Controls regarding the company’s annual stockholder meeting are controls related to
1) controls related to the control environment, the risk assessment process, and the policies over risk management practices.
2) a specific event, rather than the entity as a whole.
Controls over the completeness of deposited cash relates to controls
at the account level.
An auditor that is testing controls at a company with multiple business units should test controls over
specific risks at business units that are material to the company’s consolidated financial statements.
In an audit of an issuer, the auditor is required to communicate both
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses to management and the audit committee, but only material weaknesses result in an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control.
The auditor is required to communicate all
deficiencies in internal control to management, and deficiencies that constitute a significant deficiency or a material weakness to management and the audit committee.
The auditor is not required to communicate all
control deficiencies to those charged in governance.
However, control deficiencies that are determined to be significant deficiencies and material weaknesses are required to be communicated to those charged with governance.
A scope limitation requires the auditor to
disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement, and a material weakness in internal control requires the auditor to issue an adverse opinion. Neither situation would result in a qualified opinion.
Negative assurance may be expressed when an accountant is requested
to report on the results of performing a review of management’s assertion.
Management of Eva Industries, an issuer as defined under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, believes it has eliminated a material weakness previously noted in its assessment of internal control, and has hired Henna and Company, CPAs, to attest to the improvements in internal control.
Eva’s management must provide a written report to accompany Henna and Company’s report.
A CPA should refer to Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) for a
review of pro forma financial information.
The consistency assertion in an MD&A presentation addresses whether
nonfinancial data has been accurately derived from related records.
A CPA is required to comply with the provisions of Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) when
engaged to provide assurance on investment performance statistics prepared by an investment company on established criteria. SSAE provide guidance on engagements other than reporting on historical financial statements.
The practitioner should refer to Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements for an attestation engagement. In an attest service, the practitioner is engaged to issue
a report on subject matter or on an assertion about the subject matter (in this case, the square footage of the warehouse), that is the responsibility of a party other than the practitioner (in this case, management).
Attest engagements covered under Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) specifically exclude services performed
in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS). Since a review of a nonpublic company’s financial statements is conducted under SSARS, it is not subject to attestation standards.
There is no requirement that the accountant’s report be restricted to
specified parties when reporting on an assertion about the subject matter instead of reporting directly on the subject matter.
A report on agreed-upon procedures should include
a list of the procedures performed (or reference thereto) and the related findings.
1) Financial projections are
2) Financial projections are
1) hypothetical, “what if” prospective financial statements. Because the user may need to ask the responsible party questions about the underlying assumptions
2) “restricted use” reports, whose use is restricted to the responsible party and those third parties with whom the responsible party is negotiating directly.
When a CPA examines projected financial statements, the standard report should include
a statement that the examination “… included such procedures as we considered necessary to evaluate both the assumptions used by management and the preparation and presentation of the projection.”