Audit Section 3 Flashcards
An example of an entity being expected to accrue a loss contingency for the period under audit is
Legal counsel communicated that an unfavorable judgment from current litigation was reasonably possible. (Example of a recognized subsequent event)
When there is a material loss affects the audit report and there are creditors relying on the financial statements, the client properly should adjust the financial statements. Since they are refusing to do so, the auditor would most likely
notify the board of directors of the situation in an attempt to encourage the adjustment.
When an auditor issues a report that is dual dated for a subsequent event occurring after the original date of the auditor’s report, but before issuance of the related financial statements, the auditor’s responsibility for events occurring subsequent to the original report date is
limited to the specific event referenced.
When facts are discovered after issuing an auditor’s report that would have caused the auditor to revise the report, the auditor should discuss the matter with
management and, if it is determined that the financial statements need revision, ask how management intends to address the matter in the financial statements.
When subsequently discovered information is found both to be reliable and to have existed at the date of the auditor’s report, the auditor should
determine whether there are persons relying or likely to rely on the financial statements who would attach importance to the information.
Long-term debt that matures within one year is reported as a
current liability on the balance sheet. An auditor reviews changes in long-term debt occurring after year-end to evaluate whether such debt is appropriately classified on the balance sheet.
What would an auditor most likely perform in obtaining evidence about subsequent events
Investigate changes in long-term debt occurring after year-end
Since the auditor’s report was newly dated as of April 11, Year 4, the auditor is responsible for subsequent events until that date. The period between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report is the subsequent period, during which the auditor is responsible for
investigating certain subsequent events
DUAL DATE is
when a major event comes to the auditor’s attention between the report date and issuance of the report; the financial statements may include the event as an adjustment or disclosure.
An auditor tests accounting records by using
analytical procedures and substantive procedures.
Accounting records consist of records of initial
journal entries and any supporting records.
Internal consistency among a client’s accounting records provides
limited evidence that the financial statements are fairly presented.
A client’s accounting records are
not sufficient support for an audit opinion. The auditor must test the accuracy of the accounting records by performing analytical procedures and substantive procedures.
When confirmations are sent out by the auditor and received back directly, this represents a form of
external evidence. While external evidence is considered the second most reliable evidence, an auditor’s direct personal knowledge (obtained through examination, re-computation, inspection, and observation) is the most reliable form of evidence.
PCAOB standards state that the relevance of audit evidences depends on
A. Whether the audit procedure is designed to directly test an assertion.
B. Whether the audit procedure is designed to test for an understatement or overstatement.
C. The timing of the audit procedure.
The auditor’s risk assessment affects
the nature, extent, and timing of audit procedures, but does not determine the relevance of audit evidence.
In order to obtain a reasonable basis for an audit opinion regarding the fairness of the client’s financial statements, the auditor should usually obtain and rely on evidence that is:
Persuasive because it is usually not possible or practical to obtain assurance beyond all doubt (100% of accounting data tested), the auditor should usually rely on audit evidence that is persuasive. Persuasiveness is a subjective concept, and is unique to each audit.
An auditor is in the process of gathering evidence during the current audit. Which of the following would not be considered corroborating evidence?
Sales invoices if an auditor reviews a client’s invoices, he or she would be examining the underlying accounting records of the client. Other underlying accounting records the auditor may review include contracts, ledgers, worksheets, checks, and journal entries.
An advantage of using statistical over nonstatistical sampling methods in tests of controls is that the statistical methods
Provide an objective basis for quantitatively evaluating sample risk. By using statistical sampling, the auditor can quantify sampling risk to assist in limiting it to a level considered acceptable.
The auditor decided to increase the level of the preliminary assessment of control risk because
the 7% tolerable rate (maximum rate of deviations that an auditor would be willing to accept without altering his/her planned reliance on the control) was less than the 8% upper deviation rate.
The risk of incorrect acceptance is an aspect of sampling risk that the auditor considers when
designing an audit procedure where sampling is used. This is considered before any potential misstatement is identified.
Qualitative factor that an auditor of a nonissuer may consider relevant when evaluating whether misstatements are material
A. The potential effect of the misstatement on the entity’s compliance with a contractual agreement.
B. The significance of the financial statement element affected by the misstatement.
C. The masking effect of the misstatement on a change in earnings in the context of industry conditions.
If the actual deviation rate in the population exceeds the maximum deviation rate based on the sample, control risk will be
understated, because the control will be less effective than sample results would indicate.
The missing invoice should be counted as a deviation, resulting in a 2% sample deviation rate.
However, this information alone is not sufficient to determine whether the control can be relied upon. The auditor would also need to know the
upper deviation rate or the allowance for sampling risk, which would allow the auditor to calculate the upper deviation rate). It is the upper deviation rate that needs to be compared to the tolerable rate in making decisions.
An auditor who uses statistical sampling for attributes in testing controls should reduce the planned reliance on a prescribed control when the:
Sample rate of deviation plus the allowance for sampling risk exceeds the tolerable rate.
Nonsampling risk includes all aspects of audit risk that are not due to sampling. Examples of nonsampling risk include
The auditor selecting inappropriate auditing procedures, using inappropriate audit evidence, and failure by the auditor to recognize misstatements in documents examined.
Stratified mean per unit (MPU) sampling is statical technique that mat be more efficient than unstratified MPU because it usually
produces an estimate having a desired level of precision with a smaller sample size
Probability Proportional Size (PPS) sampling, also known as dollar unit sampling is
The auditor controls the risk of incorrect acceptance by specifying that risk level for the sampling plan bc the inputs can be tolerable misstatements
The expected rate of deviation of the population to be tested is
one of the items the auditor considers when planning an audit sample for tests of controls.
When an auditor of a nonissuer uses statistical sampling techniques to perform a test of controls related to an assertion, factors that influence the sample size include
The expected rate of deviation of the population to be tested.
When testing a sample of an audit clients bank reconciliations during the year under audit, an auditor notices that several immaterial deposits in transit did not clear the bank in a timely manner
The auditor should consider the implications for the integrity of management or employees and the possible effect on the other aspects of the audit
The asset can not be tolerated if the projected error is
higher than the tolerable misstatement
The auditor selected a sample of every twentieth item. The overstatement is $3,700 and the understatement is $200.
- (1/20) = .05
- 3,700 - 200 =3,500
- 3,500 / .05 = 70,000
After identification of misstatements in the sample, the next step is to
be project the detected error to the entire population
An auditor randomly samples 50 out of 1,000 items and discovers an overstatement of $3,000. What is the projected misstatement for the entire population?
- (50 / 1,000) = 5%
- (3,000 / .05) = 60,000
An inner join uses only the records that
both data sets have in common. Therefore is there is any matching records in two data sets thats the answer.
Scatter plot allows
for the auditor to graphically show the relationship among variables. They allow for the regression lines to be added to show the direction and strength of correlation
Descriptive Analytics
describes what happened within the data. Aging the accounts receivable data would summarize and describe the data.
Diagnostic Analytics
explained why something happened.
Predictive Analytics
provide expected or predicted outcomes based on historical data.
Prescriptive Analytics
prescribe or recommend actions to be taken based on advanced analytics to reach a desired goal
Verifying assertions of accuracy and occurrence for all material transactions
are tested as part of substantive procedures
An auditor may apply audit data analytics (ADAs) when concluding an audit if
1) The auditor will have a deeper knowledge of the entity being audited and may reperform tests done in the risk assessment process
2) To gain comfort that no material misstatements went unidentified during the audit
3) To update existing analytics with numbers that were revised during the audit
Unstructured data is
social media posts because it is not organized and has a variety of data formats and types including texts, numbers, images, audio and video
When utilizing a graph
scaling is an appropriate consideration to avoid misinterpretation of differences
Data obtained through verbal interviews with fixed asset manager is considered
more reliable than data provided by client because data obtained directly by auditor is more reliable
An auditor is confirming accounts receivable using positive confirmations. The auditor decides to leave the accounts receivable amount blank rather than stating the amount owed. The auditor should be aware that the blank form may be less efficient because
Blank forms may result in lower response rates because a greater effort is required for response.
Sales personnel will have a tendency to maximize sales volume by selling to customers that may not be creditworthy, thereby resulting in
high bad debt write-offs. To prevent sales to customers that may not be creditworthy, employees involved in the credit-granting function are separated from the sales function.
Controls most likely would help ensure that all credit sales transactions of an entity are recorded
The billing department supervisor matches prenumbered shipping documents with entries in the sales journal.
Shipping documents provide evidence that
a sale occurred, and therefore selecting from a population of shipping documents allows the auditor to test whether corresponding invoices exist for each sale.
Preparing invoices and recording the related receivables are both recordkeeping functions that
would not be inconsistent with each other.
An accounting clerk receives customer payments and records the resulting reduction in accounts receivable.
This would allow the clerk to misappropriate cash while still reducing the receivable, such as in a lapping scheme.
The cashier performs the monthly bank reconciliation.
The purpose of a bank reconciliation is to uncover unexplained discrepancies between the bank balance and the cash on hand. If the reconciliation is not performed by someone independent, the cashier may be able to misappropriate cash and conceal the theft.
The purchasing manager approves vendor invoices for payment.
This would allow the purchasing manager to purchase and pay for unauthorized goods with little oversight from others.
The cash receipts clerk should not have both
record keeping responsibilities and custody of assets.
Preparing payroll checks and preparing the payroll register are both
recordkeeping responsibilities, so there is no violation of the concept of segregation of duties. Remember, until the checks are actually signed, they do not represent assets.
The accounts payable clerk should have access to the
purchase order, the receiving report, and the vendor invoice, in order to compare the three and determine whether the invoice is appropriate for payment.
Detecting a possible understatement in sales is tantamount to testing completeness (i.e., if an understatement is found, sales are not complete). To test completeness, one needs to start with
supporting documentation, such as shipping documents, and trace forward to recording in the accounting records, such as the sales invoices and sales journal. Should the auditor find a shipping document for which there is no entry in the sales journal, an understatement error (or a completeness problem) will have been discovered.
Sound internal control dictates that, immediately upon receiving checks from customers by mail, a responsible employee should:
Prepare a duplicate listing of checks received. Upon receipt of cash, a remittance listing should be prepared.
In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, an auditor most likely reviews the entity’s aging of receivables to support the assertion of
valuation and allocation (i.e., to determine whether the allowance for doubtful accounts properly adjusts the receivables balance to net realizable value).
Evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts does not pertain to existence. To support the assertion of existence, an auditor would most likely
confirm accounts receivable
completeness assertion
An auditor would trace from shipping records to the sales journal and the accounts receivable ledger to determine if all shipments were properly recorded as sales
The assertion of rights and obligations relating to accounts receivable would be supported by examining appropriate
supporting documentation, not by evaluating the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The completeness assertion is most closely related
to the completeness audit objective that verifies all sales have been recorded.
The occurrence assertion is most closely related to
the occurrence audit objective that verifies sales are valid
The accuracy assertion is most closely related to the
accuracy audit objective that verifies sales are properly valued.
The cutoff assertion is most closely related to the
timing audit objective that verifies sales are recorded in the correct accounting period.
Assertions about valuation and allocation deal with
whether asset, liability, revenue, and expense components have been included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts, and any resulting valuation adjustments are appropriately recorded. For example, management asserts that trade accounts receivable included in the balance sheet are stated at net realizable value.
Assertions about understandability of presentation and classification deal with whether
financial information is appropriately presented and described, and disclosures are clearly expressed. Reviewing credit ratings of delinquent customers does not provide evidence about this type of assertion.
Assertions about existence deal with whether
assets, liabilities, and equity interest of the entity exist at a given date. Reviewing credit ratings of delinquent customers does not provide evidence about this type of assertion.
Assertions about rights and obligations deal with
whether assets are the rights of the entity and liabilities are the obligations of the entity at a given date. Reviewing credit ratings of delinquent customers does not provide evidence about this type of assertion.
Cutoff tests are designed to determine whether transactions have
been recorded in the proper period.
Tests to detect credit sales made before the end of the year that have been (improperly) recorded in the subsequent year provide assurance about both cutoff and completeness (i.e., whether all current year sales have been properly included).
In recording fictitious sales, the client will likely have created
phony sales invoices, but no related shipment will have occurred.
A purchase order number is
unlikely to be used in an audit data analytic procedure related to the revenue cycle. A purchase order number is more likely to be used in an audit data analytic procedure related to the expenditure cycle.
Sending confirmations to customers is the most appropriate audit procedure to test
the existence of accounts receivable.
E-mail responses to requests for confirmations of accounts receivable present a problem to the auditor, since the
sender might not be as requested and the content might be altered. To reduce these risks, the auditor should request the senders to mail the original forms to the auditor.
Could improve the response rate of the confirmations of accounts receivable
Include a list of items or invoices that constitute the customers’ account balances. (Trying to make it easier for them to respond)
Confirmation responses received electronically should be
verified by calling the sender. It is possible for such responses to look like they came from the respondent when in fact they were actually generated by another party, such as the client.
Confirmations are not required if
the balance of receivables is immaterial.
What would be an appropriate alternative procedure when responses are not received.
Verification of subsequent cash receipts provides excellent evidence about year-end receivables
Negative confirmations only request a response when
the amount stated is incorrect, so there would be no need to perform additional procedures in this case.
In auditing accounts receivable the negative form of confirmation request most likely would be used when
The combined assessed level of inherent and control risk relative to accounts receivable is low.
Negative confirmation of accounts receivable is less effective than positive confirmation of accounts receivable because
The auditor cannot infer that all nonrespondents have verified their account information.
Two assertions for which confirmation of accounts receivable balances provides primary evidence are
Rights and obligations (does the client have a right to the receivable) and existence (does the receivable really exist)
Because of the significant discrepancies on past confirmations, the auditor would most likely choose to use
individual invoices there should be fewer discrepancies than confirmations sent out to customers in years past.
The auditor should perform alternative procedures on the confirmation selected since the client has a valid reason for requesting that the confirmation not be confirmed. An acceptable alternative procedure for accounts receivable confirmations is
verifying account balance by inspecting the client’s bank statements and cash receipt records.
The auditor would only increase detection risk in response to
a decrease in inherent and/or control risks, which is not the case here. Additionally, confirmation relates to the existence assertion, not the valuation assertion.
Confirmation of accounts receivable confirm the existence of the receivable. A lower than expected response rate could be indicative
of fictitious customer accounts.