Attributions Flashcards
What are attributions
The process of assigning a cause to our behaviour or that of others
What is Naïve psychologist as an explanation for attribution theories
Heider 1958 : people act like ‘common sense’ scientist, forming intuitive reasons for people’s behaviour. Based his ideas on three principles.
What are Heiders three principles for Naive scientist as an explanation for attributions
As we feel our own behaviour is motivated we look for the causes for other people’s behaviour (heider-simmel illusion experiment). We tend to look for stable and enduring properties that cause behaviour (easier to predict).when attributing behaviour we distinguish between internal / dispositional and external/ situational
Internal vs external attribution
Internal (dispositional) process of assigning the cause of our and others behaviour to personal factors.
External (or situational ) assigning the cause of our own or others behaviour to environmental factors
Do we rely more on dispositional or situational factors
Dispositional
Correspondence inference
Attributing behaviour primarily to underlying disposition, because it is stable makes behaviour more predictable and increase our sense of control.
What are jones and Davies five cues for correspondence inference.
The behaviour is freely chosen
The behaviour produces a non - common effect
The behaviour was not socially desirable
The behaviour has an important outcome for us
The behaviour is directed towards us ( positively or negatively)
If no = it’s situational
What is meant by non common effect
Effects of behaviour that are relativity exclusive to that behaviour rather than other behaviours.
Freely chosen
More indicative of disposition than behaviour that is clearly under control of external threats
Why does behaviour with non-common effect tell us more about dispositions
People assume others are aware of non- common effects and that specific behaviour was performed intentionally to produce a non-common effect (outcome bias)
Not Socially desirable behaviours…
Not controlled by societal norms so better basis for making a correspondent inference
Hedonic relevance
Refers to Behaviour that has important direct consequences for self.
Personalism
Behaviour that appears to be directly intended to benefit or harm oneself rather than others
What is jones and Davis 1967 experiment
Gave rps essay about Castro and told essay was written freely or enforced (pro or anti castro ) and asked to attribute how the authors true feeing about castro. However for forced pro attitude rps inferred this behaviour to be true. Theory predicts this should be ignored.
What are some other criticism of the correspondence inference
Highlights importance intentions in making causal attributions but isn’t unintentional also a source of validity.
For non-common effects to work have to consider the behaviours that did not occur