Attatchment Flashcards

1
Q

interactional synchrony

A

caregiver + infant reflect both actions/emotions of each other in a coordinated way
‘mirroring’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reciprocity

A

2 way process
adult + infant respond to eachothers signals (verbal, facial, behaviours), taking it in turns
like a conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

attatchment

A

2 way emotional bond between 2 individuals, in which each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

schaffer’s stages of attatchment

A

asocial
indiscrimiante attatchments
specific attatchments
multiple attatchments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cuboard love theory

A

we learn attachments to the person providing us with food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AMSCI

A

adaptive, monotropic, social releasers, critical period, IWM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how long did bowlbys maternal deprivation theory say the critical period was

A

first 30 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happens if there’s a lack of monotropy attachment

A

permanent negative social, intellectual & intellectual consequences for development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

attatchment types

A

secure, insecure resistant, insecure avoidant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strange situation findings

A

secure most common
insecure least common
avoidant more common in individualistic western cultures resistant in collectivist non-western
more variation within countries than between

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

insecure avoidant

A

keep distance
exploring freely
low stranger and seperation anxiety
when mum returns, don’t look for comfort
mum shows little sensitive responsiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

secure

A

use mum as safe base as exploring
moderate stranger/seperation axniety
happy reunion/settle quick
mum shows SRi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

insecure resistant

A

clingy/don’t explore
seeking closeness to mum
high stranger/seperation anxiety
mum returns=ambivalent
mum shows inconsistent SR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

maternal deprivation consequences

A

deliquency, low IQ, affectionate psychopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Rutter suggest about the effects of privation?

A

adoption within first 6 months is important, rate of recovery depends of age of adoption. The effects of privation are severe/long-lasting but many show recovery after adoption at 2, suggesting CP is sensitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hazen & Shaver (influence of early attachment)

A

argue adults relationship type is a continuation of their infants attachment style. argues if secure= more socially capable in childhood/adulthood than insecure due to an effective IWM

17
Q

continuity hypothesis

A

suggests an individuals future will follow a pattern based on IWM

18
Q

schaffer/emerson stages of attachment findings

A

-seperation anxiety occured most by 25-35weeks
-stranger anxiety month later
-in 18 month follow up 87% had multiple attachments
suggesting development occurs in 4 stages, quality of caregiver infant interactions matters to strength of attachment

19
Q

schaffer/emerson stages of attachment aim

A

to identify stages of attachment

20
Q

schaffer/emerson procedure for formation of early attachments

A

-anaylysed CI interactions
-mothers kept a diary tracking infants behaviours of seperation/stranger anxiety & social referencing
-visited infants once a month then at the end

21
Q

schaffer role of father findings

A

75% attached to father by 18m
-29% within a month of primary attachment demonstrated by seperation anxiety
-suggesting father role is important but unlikely to be first attachment

22
Q

what did the grossman 2002 study role of father suggest about primary and secondary parental attachments?

A

-longitudinal study
-mothers were primary attachment bc they took physical&emotional care of child
-father’s secondary bc they played with child

23
Q

classical conditioning explanation

A

-association between mum (NS) & pleasure, bc of food (innate UCR)
-associated mum w/ pleasure of being fed
-mum becomes CS, also causing pleasure
-baby feels happy near mum
-formation of attachment

24
Q

skinner’s operant conditioning explanation

A

-baby cries, triggering a response e.g mother feeding/comforting
-more frequent= more reinforced
-child associated mother w/ rewards
-being rewarded encourages baby to cry to recieve more reward
-food primary reinforcer, mother seconday

25
what was bowlby's theory of monptropy
-evolutionary explanation -argues infants have an innate drive to form an especially strong monotropic attachment to their mother and stay close in proximity -says it's instinctual, vital to survive
26
lorenz goose study procedure
-goose eggs randomly divided, half to hatch w biological mother, half to hatch w/ lorenz & incubator
27
lorenz goose study findings
-goslings he hatched followed him, not bio-mum -those that hatched naturally followed bio-mum (imprinted on mum/lorenz) -critical period of 32hrs- if hadn't imprinted then, they'd have lost the ability
28
harlows monkey procedure
-placed in cage w fake mums -1 mum provided milk, other was comfort
29
harlows monkey findings
-spent most of time with comfort cloth, only seeing food mum quickly to eat -returned to comfort when frightened -monkeys w/o comfort mum had stress related illnesses
30
what did maternal deprivation cause harlows monkeys
-permanent social disorders as adults -difficulty mating/raising offspring
31
van ijzendoorn procedure
-large scale meta analysis -200 infants -32 studies -8 countries -studied attachment using strange situation
32
van ijzendoorn findings
-secure most common in all countries -avoidant most common in individualistic countries -resistant in collectivist non-western -more variation
33
van ijzendoorn country percentages for attachment types
germany IA= 35% japan IR= 27% china least secure= 50% UK most secure= 75%
34
strange situation procedure
-106 infants 48-67 weeks old -structured observation, controlled lab -each stage 3 min -assessed proximity, secure base, stranger&seperation anxiety, reunion response & SR
35
strange situation findings
65% secure 21% ia 14% ir
36
what did the strange situation findings suggest about forming a secure attachment
a secure attachment develops due to the attention of a consistently SR mum
37
what does an infant need during CP for secure attachment
consistent, monotropic, warm care