Attachment Theories Flashcards

1
Q

What is attachment?

A

A strong enduring emotional bond between a child and their primary caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Harlow aim to find with his study?

A

Aimed to look at how attachment is developedin infant monkeys by offering options of fake mothers providing food or comfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were Harlows methods?

A

Rhesus monkey babies were separated from their mothers and “reared” by fake surrogates. One covered in cloth (provided warmth/ comfort). The other only wire mesh with a baby bottle (provided food).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were Harlows findings?

A

The monkeys would cling to the cloth mothers, only moving to the wire mesh mothers for feeding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were Harlows conclusions?

A

Harlow concluded that ‘contact comfort’, provided by the cloth mother, was more important than feeding in the formation of an infant’s attachment to its mother. Harlow generalised his findings to suggest that ‘contact comfort’ was most likely a crucial factor in human infant-parent attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were criticisms of Harlows study?

A

The study was unethical and inhumane and would not stand up to modern scrutiny as it resulted in life long issues for the monkeys involved. The monkeys never fully developed social skills to bond with other monkeys.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the evolutionary perspective?

A

Mothers have a biological need to be close to their child. Children who are close to their mothers would have avoided predators/stayed safe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a monotropy?

A

The primary bond (usually formed with the mother) is the most important bond.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the sensitive peroid and when does it occur?

A

The optimum time when an infant becomes imprinted by early contact with a mother.
Critical period of bond is within the babies first 12 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis.

A

Maternal deprivation is the failure to develop attachment to a primary caregiver – possibly due to the loss, separation, or neglect of a mother. If the early attachment bond of a child is broken (during sensitive period), serious long term consequences can result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could happen in result of maternal deprivation?

A

Creates intellectual, social, and emotional issues, affectionless psychopathy (the inability to show affection or concern for others), increased aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Bowlbys theory include?

A

Combined biological (innate drive for attachment) and cognitive (mental representations of attachment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an internal working model and which theorist suggested it?

A

We develop a model of what relationships should look like in the future based off our primary caregivers as a child. (Bowlby)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 internal models?

A
  1. Model of others
  2. Model of self being valuable to others
  3. Model of self being effective when interacting with others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are streangth of Bowlby’s theory?

A
  • Bowlby was the first to consider the pair and not just the infant.
  • It is considered the dominant explanation of how and why attachment develops.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are criticisms of Bowlby’s theory?

A
  • Many argue the idea of a “primary” caregiver, as it is common that a child feels attachment to multiple people.
  • Evolutionary perspective has good face validity, but are very difficult to test and therefore, difficult to prove or disprove.
17
Q

Who is Ainsworth and what did she do?

A

Experimented on Blowby’s work, challenged the theory that attachment is an all or nothing concept. She developed an experimental procedure to observe types of attachments between infants and mothers.

18
Q

What was the aim of the strange situation?

A

Aimed to look at how infants reacted to a mothers presence and absence, with a stranger present in order to determine their attachment.

19
Q

What was the method of the stange situation?

A
  • Parent and infant alone.
  • Stranger joins parent and infant.
  • Parent leaves infant and stranger alone.
  • Parent returns and stranger leaves.
  • Parent leaves; infant left completely alone.
  • Stranger returns.
  • Parent returns and stranger leaves.
20
Q

What did researches observe from the infant during the stragnge situation?

A

Exploration: to what extent does the child explore his/her environment?

Reaction to departure: what is the child’s response when the caregiver leaves?

The stranger anxiety: how does the child respond when alone with the stranger?

Reunion: how does the child respond when the caregiver returns?

21
Q

What were the findings of Ainsworth’s strange situation?

A

Ainsworth considered that the type of attachment formed between mother and child depended on how sensitive and responsive the mother was to her child’s signals, shown through the infant’s responses to the stresses of the Strange Situation.

22
Q

What are Ainsworth’s types of attachment?

A

Type A: Insecure avoidant attachment
Type B: Secure attachment
Type C: Insecure resistant attachment

23
Q

Explain insecure avoidant attachment in relation to the strange situation

A
  • 25% of infants
  • React to strangers similar to their caregiver, rarely becomes upset when stranger enters
  • Show little apparent distress when separated from their mothers
  • Only becomes upset when left alone.
  • Avoid contact, ignore or seem indifferent when their mothers return
24
Q

What are 3 characteristics in adults in the result of insecure avoidant attachment?

A
  • May have problems with intimacy
  • Invest little emotion in social and romantic relationships
  • Unable or unwilling to share thoughts and feelings with others
25
Q

Explain secure attachment in relation to the stange situation

A
  • 65% of infants
  • Infant actively explores the room when alone with their mother, touching base with caregiver periodically for security as they serve as a secure base.
  • When his mother is present, the securely attached child is outgoing with a stranger.
  • May or may not cry when separated, but when caregiver returns, crying ceases quickly.
26
Q

What are 4 characteristics in adults in the result of secure attachment?

A
  • Have trusting long lasting relationships
  • Have good self esteem
  • Comfortable sharing feelings with friens and partners
  • Seek out social support
27
Q

Explain insecure resistant attachment in relation to the stange situation

A

-Clings to caregiver, probably because she is not a secure base for exploration.

  • Likely does not venture off to play even when his mother is present.
  • Wary of strangers
  • After caregiver returns, they first seek them, but does not calm down or show joy at return, they may resists or rejects offers of comfort by pushing or kicking them away.
28
Q

What are 3 characteristics in adults in the result of insecure resistant attachment?

A
  • Reluctant to become close with others
  • Worry their partner doesn’t love them
  • Become distraught when a relationship ends
29
Q

What are strengths of Ainsworth’s experiment?

A

Proposed the association between mother’s behaviour & infants attachment type, suggesting the mother’s behaviour may help to determine attachment type. Controlled observation (laboratory setting) thus easily replicated increasing reliability.

30
Q

What are criticisms of Ainsworth’s experiment?

A

Critics of the strange situation question whether this method is really measuring attachment or is it measuring the “strangeness” of the situation. And the variation in cultral backgrounds.