Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is reciprocity?

A

A description of how people interact. A mother-infant interaction is reciprocal in that both infant and mother respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

Mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions of the other in a co ordinated or synchronised way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe some research into interactional synchrony.

A

Meltzoff and Moore observed interactional synchrony in children as young as two weeks old. Where an association was seen between the facial expression of an adult and that of the infant.
Isabella et al. Also found that IS was important for the quality of attachment. 30 mother infant diads were assessed on the quality of IS and found that the better the quality of synchrony the better the attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evaluate reciprocity and interactional synchrony.

A
  • it is incredibly hard to accurately observe infants. For example it’s hard to know whether they are imitating adults or the movement occurred by chance.
  • observations done have good internal validity as mother and infant are both filmed from different angles. Babies behaviour also isn’t effected by being watched.
  • observations do not tell us the purpose of interactional synchrony, just that it exists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What percentage of children attached to their father by 18 months old?

A

Schaffer and Emerson found that 75% of infants protested when their father walked away by the age of 18 months - a sign of attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the role of the father in attachment?

A

Grossman carried out a longitudinal study looking at parents behaviour and attachment. He found that the quality of fathers play with an infant affected the infants later attachment in their teenage years. In infants the attachment of both parents was equally important. This seems to say that a fathers role in attachment is one of playmate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens if a father becomes the primary caregiver?

A

Tiffany Field found that primary caregiver fathers spend more time smiling, imitating and holding infants than secondary caregiver fathers. This shows that primary caregiver fathers are capable of taking on a more maternal role in attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate findings on the role of fathers in attachment.

A
  • there are inconsistent findings, depending on what the research focuses on fathers are either just as important as mothers or not so, and more linked to play.
  • children growing up in single sex or single parent families develop no differently to other children, showing that research may be flawed.
  • biological factors such as oestrogen could show why mothers are generally primary carers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe Schaffer and Emersons study and their findings.

A
  • 60 babies from Glasgow, from skilled, working class families
  • families visited once a month in the first year then again at 18 months
  • mothers interviewed and wrote diaries about babies separation behaviour and stranger anxiety
  • between 25 and 30 weeks 50% of babies showed attachment to primary attachment figure
  • by 40 weeks 80% of babies had one attachment and 30% had multiple attachments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name and describe the stages of attachment.

A
  1. Asocial stage (first few weeks) babies begin to distinguish between people and inanimate objects. show little preference of people.
  2. Indiscriminate attachment (from 2-7 months) prefer people over objects and prefer familiar adults. no separation or stranger anxiety.
  3. Specific attachment (from 7 months) babies begin to show stranger anxiety and separation anxiety from the primary attachment figure
  4. Multiple attachments (by the age of 1) babies form secondary attachments to other familiar adults.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate Schaffer and Emerson’s study into attachment.

A
  • good external validity as it was done in the babies own homes - not affected by being observed or in a strange place.
  • it’s a longitudinal study so has good internal validity and eliminates participant variables/individual differences.
  • it had a limited sample, a good number but all from the same place and social class. may not necessarily generalise to other areas of society and may also lack temporal validity as parenting has changed in the last 50 years.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluate the stages of attachment.

A
  • the asocial stage is difficult to observe as the babies have limited mobility etc so we can only make an inference that they are asocial.
  • evidence from collectivist cultures (Van Ijzendoorn’s study etc) contradicts the stages and shows babies forming multiple attachments first
  • there is evidence to suggest that a baby may get distressed when a playmate leaves the room, making it hard to tell whether an individual is a primary attachment figure or a playmate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe Lorenz’s research and findings.

A

in his experiment he randomly divided goose eggs - one group was hatched to a mother goose and he hatched the other half in an incubator.
he found that the experimental group that he hatched himself followed him around like they would the mother goose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is imprinting and the critical period?

A

imprinting is an innate readiness to acquire certain behaviours during a critical period of time. Lorenz identified that the critical period could be as short as a few hours in some species.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Lorenz find about sexual imprinting?

A

he found that birds who had bee reared by humans later displayed courting behaviours towards humans. he used the case study of a peacock raised with giant tortoises who later displayed mating behaviour towards them. he called this sexual imprinting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evaluate Lorenz’s research.

A
  • birds are not similar to humans so it may be difficult to generalise his findings in geese to human attachment behaviour.
  • lorenz believed that sexual imprinting was permanent but Guiton et al. found that chickens eventually learnt to mate with other chickens - showing it was not permanent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

describe Harloew’s research and findings.

A
  • Harlow took 16 baby monkeys and raised them with two mothers. a wire mother that produced food and a cloth mother without food
  • Harlow proved the importance of contact comfort as the monkeys preferred the cloth mother regardless of which dispensed milk - they spent 23/24 hours attached to cloth mother.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what did Harlow find about maternally deprived monkeys as adults?

A

the monkeys raised without real mothers did not develop normally. the monkeys raised only with the wire mother were the worst effected - they were more aggressive and less social than normal monkeys. they mated less often. as parents they neglected or even killed their young.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what did Harlow find about the critical period?

A

a mother had to be introduced to an infant monkey within 90 days for an attachment to form. after this maternal deprivation became inevitable and irreversible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

evaluate Harlow’s research.

A
  • Harlow influenced the change in parenting in the 1950’s , showing the importance of contact comfort and relationships on later development.
  • the findings have been used to help look after and understand neglected or abused children. not to mention monkeys in zoos.
  • Harlow’s research was ethically questionable - the monkeys suffered greatly and their suffering could be generalised to humans. however the information it provided may have made it worthwhile.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

how does the learning theory use classical conditioning to explain attachment?

A

food serves as the UCS and the mother as simply a NS. as the mother/primary attachment figure feeds the baby the baby associates food and the UCR of happiness with the mother. so the mother becomes the CS which produces the CR of happiness in the infant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how does the learning theory use operant conditioning to explain attachment?

A

the baby performs behaviours linked to attachment that the caregiver will reinorce. for example when a baby cries it receives comfort, so is positively reinforced. on the flip side the caregiver is negatively reinforced when the crying stops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

explain the theory of attachment as a secondary drive (SLT)

A

learning theory focuses on drive reduction. hunger is a primary drive, biological and innate. Sears et al. suggested that the babies primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to the caregiver who provides the food. so the caregiver becomes a secondary drive by association.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

evaluate the social learning theory of attachment.

A
  • in both Lorenz and Harlows experiments they proved that the animal does not attach to the mother that feeds them. Harlow stressed the importance of contact comfort over food. and the geese imprinted on Lorenz before he fed them.
  • Schaffer and Emerson showed that babies attach to people who respond and interact with them most rather than the person who fed them most.
  • there would be no purpose in complex interactions such as interactional synchrony if babies simply experienced cupboard love.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Describe Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment.

A

It is a theory that involves one important and fundamentally different attachment to one person (monotropic). Featuring social releasers to trigger attachment in the adult. This relationship affects the infants internal working model of relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Define the term monotropic

A

Bowlby placed great significance on the relationship between the primary caregiver and the infant. He said this relationship was different to others and more important. The law of continuity stated that the more constant and predictable this care the better the attachment. The law of accumulated separation stated that every absence of the caregiver accumulated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are social releasers?

A

Innate cute behaviours that babies are born with such as smiling or making noises. These behaviours trigger the attachment response in adults, which is also innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the critical period of attachment, according to Bowlby?

A

Bowlby defined the critical period as the first two years of a child’s life. Where if an attachment is to form at all it must form then. He later changed this to the sensitive period, a slightly longer period where it is possible for an attachment to form but is more difficult.

29
Q

What is the internal working model?

A

A mental representation on what relationships and attachments should be like. It affects the quality of relationships they later have and also their own ability to parent.

30
Q

Evaluate Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attchment.

A
  • there is mixed evidence for monotropy as Schaffer and Emerson found that a significant minority of infants formed multiple attachments at once.
  • Brazelton et Al. Did an experiment where parents were asked to ignore their babies social releasers. The babies responded with distress, some even lay motionless.
  • Bailey at al. Did a study on 99 mothers. They found that mothers had a very similar type of relationship with their own mother as they now had with their child. Showing how the internal working model affects your ability to parent your own children.
31
Q

Describe the procedure of Ainsworth’s strange situation experiment.

A

It was a controlled observation in which psychologists watched the interaction between mother and child through a two way mirror.
The procedure included 7 steps each lasting three minutes.
The stages tested things such as proximity seeking, secure base behaviour, stranger and separation anxiety and response to reunion.

32
Q

Describe the findings of Ainsworth’s strange situation observation.

A

She identified three main types of attachment:

  • type A (insecure avoidant) explore freely, no secure base attachment, little stranger anxiety and do not require comfort on reunion.
  • type B (secure attachment) explore happily but show secure base behaviour, moderate separation and stranger anxiety. Require and accept comfort on reunion.
  • type C (insecure resistant) seek greater proximity and explore less. Show huge separation and stranger anxiety but resist comfort when reunited with the carer
33
Q

What percentage of British toddlers are in each class of attachment?

A

Type A - 20-25%
Type B - 60-75%
Type C - 3%

34
Q

Evaluate the strange situation (Mary Ainsworth)

A
  • it is very valid as it has been shown to accurately predict later outcomes’ I.e. Ward found that securely attached infants later had more friends and did better in school.
  • it has good reliability as it is a controlled observation in which the behavioural categories are very easy to identify. It doesn’t just depend on who’s watching the babies.
  • the strange situation may only work in Western cultures. There would be obvious and expected differences in countries like Japan where infants are so rarely left alone.
35
Q

Describe Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenbergs study (procedure)

A

Meta analysis of 32 studies that used the strange situation to measure the proportions of attachment types. The studies were conducted in 8 countries. 18 studies from America. Overall the meta analysis included 1,990 children.

36
Q

Describe Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenbergs findings.

A
  • in all countries secure attachment was most common.
  • insecure resistant was least common but data ranged from 3% in Britain to 30% in Israel.
  • variation of results within the same country was found to be 150% greater than variation between countries.
37
Q

Describe some studies into cultural variations of attachment.

A

Italian study: found a much lower proportion of secure attachment. They suggested this was due to mothers working increasingly long hours.
Korean study: found similarly low proportions of insecure avoidant as Japanese studies. Parenting styles in the two countries are very similar.

38
Q

What conclusion can be drawn from the fact that internationally secure attachment is still the most common type?

A

That Bowlby was right and attachment is an innate thing that all humans are born with.

39
Q

Evaluate research into cultural variations of attachment.

A
  • high internal validity, meta analysis especially as it uses a huge sample size (nearly 2000 infants)
  • samples can be unrepresentative of the culture. For example some samples overrepresent urban culture over rural culture, or wealthy families over those living in impoverished areas.
  • the strange situation may be biased towards western/ or even British and American cultures. Within a cultural context separation anxiety may be seen as weakness not attachment. And independence more encouraged.
40
Q

What is Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation?

A

He theorised that separation from the mother figure or non continuous care from this figure is called maternal deprivation. This causes abnormal psychological, emotional and intellectual development

41
Q

What is the difference between separation and deprivation?

A

Separation is just a brief period where the infant isn’t with the caregiver, it is normal and does not cause psychological impairment. Deprivation is caused by extended separation.

42
Q

What did Bowlby say was the critical period for maternal deprivation?

A

The first 30 months of the child’s life.

43
Q

What effect does maternal deprivation have on intellectual development?

A

Maternal deprivation is thought to possibly lead to a lower IQ. this has been demonstrated in studies of institutionalisation

44
Q

What are the effects of maternal deprivation on emotional development?

A

Bowlby believed that maternal deprivation could lead to affectionless psychopathy - an inability to feel guilt or remorse and are unlikely to form strong connections with others. Ties to criminal behaviours.

45
Q

Explain the procedure of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study.

A

44 teenage thieves.
Interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy
Families interviews to determine maternal deprivation or not.
Control group of non criminal but emotionally disturbed young people.

46
Q

Explain the findings of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study.

A

14/44 thieves had affectionless psychopathy. Of these 14 12 had maternal deprivation. 5 of the 30 thieves without AP had maternal deprivation.
In the control group 2/44 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers.

47
Q

Evaluate the theory of maternal deprivation.

A
  • the time when Bowlby performed his research may lead to poor evidence. War orphans etc. experienced trauma as well as maternal deprivation.
  • there’s counter evidence such as Lewis’s findings of 500 young people - she found no link between early separation and criminality
  • it may be more of a sensitive period. Some case studies show children who had experienced extreme separation have fully recovered under the care of new loving families
48
Q

Describe Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment.

A

It is a theory that involves one important and fundamentally different attachment to one person (monotropic). Featuring social releasers to trigger attachment in the adult. This relationship affects the infants internal working model of relationships.

49
Q

Define the term monotropic

A

Bowlby placed great significance on the relationship between the primary caregiver and the infant. He said this relationship was different to others and more important. The law of continuity stated that the more constant and predictable this care the better the attachment. The law of accumulated separation stated that every absence of the caregiver accumulated.

50
Q

What are social releasers?

A

Innate cute behaviours that babies are born with such as smiling or making noises. These behaviours trigger the attachment response in adults, which is also innate

51
Q

What is the critical period of attachment, according to Bowlby?

A

Bowlby defined the critical period as the first two years of a child’s life. Where if an attachment is to form at all it must form then. He later changed this to the sensitive period, a slightly longer period where it is possible for an attachment to form but is more difficult.

52
Q

What is the internal working model?

A

A mental representation on what relationships and attachments should be like. It affects the quality of relationships they later have and also their own ability to parent.

53
Q

Evaluate Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attchment.

A
  • there is mixed evidence for monotropy as Schaffer and Emerson found that a significant minority of infants formed multiple attachments at once.
  • Brazelton et Al. Did an experiment where parents were asked to ignore their babies social releasers. The babies responded with distress, some even lay motionless.
  • Bailey at al. Did a study on 99 mothers. They found that mothers had a very similar type of relationship with their own mother as they now had with their child. Showing how the internal working model affects your ability to parent your own children.
54
Q

Describe the procedure of Ainsworth’s strange situation experiment.

A

It was a controlled observation in which psychologists watched the interaction between mother and child through a two way mirror.
The procedure included 7 steps each lasting three minutes.
The stages tested things such as proximity seeking, secure base behaviour, stranger and separation anxiety and response to reunion.

55
Q

Describe the findings of Ainsworth’s strange situation observation.

A

She identified three main types of attachment:

  • type A (insecure avoidant) explore freely, no secure base attachment, little stranger anxiety and do not require comfort on reunion.
  • type B (secure attachment) explore happily but show secure base behaviour, moderate separation and stranger anxiety. Require and accept comfort on reunion.
  • type C (insecure resistant) seek greater proximity and explore less. Show huge separation and stranger anxiety but resist comfort when reunited with the carer
56
Q

What percentage of British toddlers are in each class of attachment?

A

Type A - 20-25%
Type B - 60-75%
Type C - 3%

57
Q

Evaluate the strange situation (Mary Ainsworth)

A
  • it is very valid as it has been shown to accurately predict later outcomes’ I.e. Ward found that securely attached infants later had more friends and did better in school.
  • it has good reliability as it is a controlled observation in which the behavioural categories are very easy to identify. It doesn’t just depend on who’s watching the babies.
  • the strange situation may only work in Western cultures. There would be obvious and expected differences in countries like Japan where infants are so rarely left alone.
58
Q

Describe Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenbergs study (procedure)

A

Meta analysis of 32 studies that used the strange situation to measure the proportions of attachment types. The studies were conducted in 8 countries. 18 studies from America. Overall the meta analysis included 1,990 children.

59
Q

Describe Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenbergs findings.

A
  • in all countries secure attachment was most common.
  • insecure resistant was least common but data ranged from 3% in Britain to 30% in Israel.
  • variation of results within the same country was found to be 150% greater than variation between countries.
60
Q

Describe some studies into cultural variations of attachment.

A

Italian study: found a much lower proportion of secure attachment. They suggested this was due to mothers working increasingly long hours.
Korean study: found similarly low proportions of insecure avoidant as Japanese studies. Parenting styles in the two countries are very similar.

61
Q

What conclusion can be drawn from the fact that internationally secure attachment is still the most common type?

A

That Bowlby was right and attachment is an innate thing that all humans are born with.

62
Q

Evaluate research into cultural variations of attachment.

A
  • high internal validity, meta analysis especially as it uses a huge sample size (nearly 2000 infants)
  • samples can be unrepresentative of the culture. For example some samples overrepresent urban culture over rural culture, or wealthy families over those living in impoverished areas.
  • the strange situation may be biased towards western/ or even British and American cultures. Within a cultural context separation anxiety may be seen as weakness not attachment. And independence more encouraged.
63
Q

How does the internal working model affect later relationships?

A

If a child’s internal working model is of a functional relationship later on they are more likely to seek out functional relationships.

64
Q

How does attachment type affect relationships in later childhood?

A

Securely attached infants are more likely to have the best peer relationships. Questionnaires were sent to 196 children aged 7-11 in London and it was found that insecure avoidant children were more likely to be victims of bullying and insecure avoidant were more likely to be bullies.

65
Q

Describe Hazan and Shaver’s study into romantic attachment.

A

They analysed 620 replies to the love quiz printed in a local American newspaper. There were three sections of the quiz asking about infant attachment and current attachment

66
Q

Describe Hazan and Shavers results.

A

56% were securely attached
25% were insecure avoidant
19% were insecure resistant
Securely attached were most likely to have good and longer lasting romantic relationships
Avoidant were jealous with a fear of intimacy

67
Q

How does attachment affect the persons ability to parent?

A

As we see from Bailey et al. Attachment type is carried down through generations as we use our internal working model to base our own parenting style off.

68
Q

Evaluate the influence of early attachment on later relationships.

A
  • there is mixed evidence in that some studies show that attachment type affects later relationships and some studies show little relationship between the two.
  • studies have validity issues as they are often retrospective so people may have issues with memory
  • association does not mean causality. It could be the child’s temperament or other factors that could affect a child’s ability to parent etc.