Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Attachment definition

A

Attachment = emotional bond between two individuals in which they see eachother as essential for their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Behaviours involved with attachment

A

Behaviours involved with attachment:
-Proximity - people are distressed when an attachment figure leaves
-Seperation distress - people distressed when attachment figure leaves
-Secure base behaviour = explore the environment, but return to attachment figure for comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are human babies ‘atricial’?

A

Atricial - they are born at a relatively early stage of their development - they form bonds with adults who will protect an dnurture them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why are animals ‘precocial’

A

Precocial animals - animals born at an advanced stage of development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Short term and long term benefits of attachment

A

Short term benefits of attachment: survival
Long term benefits of attachment: emotional relationships - it is believed that this first relationship between baby and parents act as a template for later relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reciprocity of attachment

A

Reciprocity of attachment:
-Alert phases: signals that they are ready for interaction, mothers typically pick up on these alerts, however it is dependent on skill of mother and external factors eg stress
-Active involvement - babies are more active than passive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Brazelton et al (1975) state about reciprocity?

A

Interactions between mother and child are like a dance - where they respond to eachother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Interactional synchrony = ‘the temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviours’ (Feldman 2007) - when two people interact and tend to mirror each other in terms of facial expressions, body movements, imitating emotions and behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Meltzoff and Moore (1977) experiment

A

Meltzoff and Moore (1977) experiment:
-Conducted the first systematic study of interactional synchrony - found that infants as young as two to three weeks old imitated specific hand gestures
-Study was conducted using an adult model who displayed one of three facial expressions or hand movement where the fingers moved in a sequence
-A dummy was placed in the infant’s mouth during the initial display to prevent any response
-Following the display, the dummy was removed and the child’s expression was filmed
-They found that there was an association between the infant behaviour and that of the adult model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is it difficult to test infant behaviour in attachment experiments?

A

It is difficult to test infant behaviour in experiments eg Meltzoff and Moore experiment -> as infants mouth constantly moving therefore difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours -> low internal validity due to uncertainty wether what is being recorded is interactional synchrony or just natural movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AO3 evaluation of involvement of reciprocity and interactional synchrony

A

AO3 evaluation of involvement of reciprocity and interactional synchrony:
- = Observations don’t tell us the purpose of synchrony and reciprocity
- = It is difficult to test infant behaviour
- = Caregiver-infant interactions is not found in all cultures
-/+ = Research into care-giver interaection is usually conducted within a labatory setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stage 1 (of attachment) - Asocial stage

A

Stage 1 (of attachment) - Asocial stage :
-First few weeks of birth
-Baby recognises and forms bonds with carers
-Baby’s behavior towards non-human objects and humans is quite similar
-Babies show preference for familiar adults in that those individuals find it easier to calm them
-Babies happier when in the presence of other humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who proposed the stages of attachment?

A

Shaffer and Merson proposed the 4 stages of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stage 2 of attachment - indiscriminate attachment

A

Stage 2 of attachment - indiscriminate attachment:
-2-7 months
-Preference for people than inanimate objects
-Recognise and prefer familiar adults
-Usually accepts cuddles and comfort from any adult
-Don’t show separation anxiety or stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stage 3 of attachment - specific attachment

A

Stage 3 of attachment - specific attachment:
-From 7 months
-Anxiety towards strangers
-Separation anxiety when separated from specific attachment
-Specific attachment = primary attachment figure
-This is the person who offers the most interaction and responds to the signals the most

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stage 4 of attachment - multiple attachments

A

Stage 4 of attachment - multiple attachments:
-Babies soon start to show attachment to more than one adult
-Adults who they regularly spend time with
-These are secondary attachments
-These form quite quickly after specific attachment (29% had one within one month)
-By the age of 1, most infants had multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

AO3 of the 4 stages of attachment

A

AO3 of the 4 stages of attachment:
- = Problems studying the asocial stage - as babies are difficult to study at this stage as they don’t move/talk
- = Conflicting evidence on multiple attachments - Bowlby believed in monotropy wheras Van Ijzendoorn believed babies have multiple attachments
- = Measuring multiple attachments - baby gSetting distressed may not be due to absence of person they are attached to
- = Measurement issues - stranger and separation anxiety are crude measures of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Difference between caregiver and attachment figure

A

-Primary caregiver: person who spends most time with a baby
-Primary attachment figure - the person to whom the baby has the strongest attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Shafferson and Merson (1964) attachment experiment procedure

A

Shafferson and Merson (1964) attachment experiment procedure:
-60 babies from Glasgow, from working-class families
-Researches visited the babies and mothers at home every month for a year and again at 18 months
-Seperation anxiety: measured by asking mothers about their children’s behaviour during everyday seperations eg mother leaving the room
-Stranger anxiety also measured by asking mothers questions about their children’s anxiety response to unfamiliar adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Findings and conclusions of Shafferson and Emerson (1964) attachment experiment

A

Findings and conclusions of Shafferson and Emerson (1964) attachment experiment:
-Babies developed attachments through a sequence of stages, from asocial through to a specific attachment to multiple attachments
-The specific attachment tended to be the person who was most interactive and sensitive to babies’ signals and facial expressions - not necessarily who the baby spent the most time with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s study into attachment

A

Strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s study into attachment:
+ = Has external validity -> most observations (not serperation anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to researchers -> alternative would’ve been for reasearchers to oberserve in the homes which may have changed the babies behaviour -> means it is highly likely they behaved how they normally would

+ = Real-world application to day care -> in early stages (Asocial and indiscriminate attachments) babies can be comforted by any skilled adult -> but if child starts day care at later stage, unfamiliar adults may cause distress -> means Schaffer and Emerson’s stages can help parents making day care decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Two limitations of Schaffer and Emmerson’s attachment experiment

A

Two limitations of Schaffer and Emmerson’s attachment experiment:
- = Poor evidence for asocial stage -> because of eraly stage of physical development babies have poor co-ordination and mobility -> makes it difficult for mothers to accurately report signs of anxiety and attachment for this age group -> means babies might actually be quite social but appear asocial due to flawed methods

  • = Based stages on a single but large-scale study of babies development in glasgow -> however child-rearing practises depend on cultural and historical context -> means observations madecannot be generalised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Positives of using behavioural categories in observational studies

A

Positives of using behavioural categories in observational studies:
-Categories provide clear focus to the researcher
-Categories enables proposal of a testable hypothesis
-Categories allow for more objective recording
-Use of categories should result in greater reliability
-Categories provide data that is easier to quantify/analyse
-Tallies or ticks and crosses can be used to mark when a behaviour is displayed which can then be compared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who conducted the 1935 gosling animal study into attachment?

A

Lorenz conducted the 1935 gosling animal study into attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Conclusions of Harlow’s monkey attachment experiment

A

Conclusions of Harlow’s monkey attachment experiment:
Importance of contact comfort- infant monkeys
prefer a soft toy mother to a wire one, regardless
of which produces milk

Maternal deprivation- Monkeys brought up
without a mother were dysfunctional as adults

Critical period- monkeys has around 90 days to
attach to a mother figure or they could not form
an attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Aim of 1958 Harlow monkey experiment

A

To investigate which of the two alternatives would have more attachment behaviours directed towards it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Harlow 1958 monkey experiment procedure

A

Harlow 1958 monkey experiment procedure:
Harlow conducted research with 8 rhesus monkeys which were caged from infancy with wire mesh food dispensing and cloth-covered surrogate mothers
-Harlow measured the amount time that monkeys spent with each surrogate mother and the amount time that they cried for their biological mother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Harlow 1958 monkey experiment findings

A

Harlow 1958 monkey experiment findings:
-Harlow’s findings revealed that separated infant monkeys would show attachment behaviours towards a cloth-covered surrogate mother when frightened, rather than a food-dispensing surrogate mother.
-Monkeys were willing to explore a room full of novel toys when the cloth-covered monkey was present but displayed phobic responses when only the food-dispensing surrogate was present.
-Furthermore, Harlow reviewed infant monkeys that were reared in a social (non-isolated) environment and observed that these monkeys went on to develop into healthy adults, while the monkeys in isolation with the surrogate mothers all displayed dysfunctional adult behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

EEvaluation of Harlow’s 1958 monkey experiment

A

Evaluation of Harlow’s 1958 monkey experiment:
+ = The fact that isolated monkeys displayed long-term dysfunctional behaviour illustrates, once more, that early attachment experiences predict long-term social development.
+ = Human and monkeys are similar(on a biological level)
+ = Important practical application -> found implications of childcare
- = Unethical research -> animals have a right not to be researched/harmed
- = Results cannot be fully generalised to humans as not reflective of emotional connections and interactions that characterises human attachment

30
Q

What is the learning theory?

A

The learning theory suggests that people behave in certain ways because they have learned to do so

31
Q

“Cupboard love” idea

A

This proposes that attachments are formed when an infant receives food - they learn to ‘love’ the person who feeds them- this is the ‘cupboard love’ idea.

32
Q

2 forms of learning (conditioning) as part of the learning theory of attachment

A

2 forms of learning attachments:
-Classical conditioning (learning through association)
-Operant conditioning (learning through rewards/punishment)

33
Q

Operant conditioning + attachments

A

Operant conditioning - learning through rewards and punishment -> behaviour is hard-wired and repeated when we do something that results in a pleasant consequence (reinforcement

34
Q

Positive reinforcer

A

Positive reinforcer = something that rewards behaviour

35
Q

Negative reinforcer

A

Negative reinforcer = when a response switches off something unpleasant

36
Q

Learning theory evaluation

A

Learning theory evaluation:
- = Harlow contradicts learning theory -> because it demonstrates that attachments are based on affection and comfort rather than just food
- = Schaffer and Emerson’s research -> showed that babies did not necessarily become attached to whoever fed them the most, rather, who spent time sensitively responding to them. This weakens the assumption of learning theory.
- = Learning theory only considers food as the driving force behind attachment formation and quality, not considering other factors such as sensitive responding and developing reciprocity. This makes the explanation over-simplistic.
- = the learning theory is highly reductionist in only looking at food as the main drive behind attachment
- = It could be said to be over-simplistic in ignoring reciprocity, sensitivity and innate qualities that may also be factors

37
Q

Primary drive definition in attachment

A

Primary drive - something the infant needs, biologically, to survive, such as food

38
Q

Secondary drive definition in attachment

A

A secondary drive is a stimulus that reinforces behaviour after it has been associated with the primary drive

39
Q

Maternal deprivation definition as stated by Bowlby

A

Maternal deprivation: emotional and intellectual consequences of seperation between a child and their mother/mother subsitution
-He proposed that continuous care from a mother is essential for normal psychological development - prolonged seperation causes serious damage to development

40
Q

Maternal deprivation effect on emotional development

A

Maternal deprivation effect on emotional development: ‘Affectionless psychopathy’ - inability to experience guilt or strong emotion for others - prevents the individual from forming normal relationships and is associated with criminality as they fail to empathise with victims and lack remorse

41
Q

Effects of maternal deprivation

A

Effects of maternal deprivation =
-Emotional development decrease
-Intellectual development decrease
-Anaclictic depression (appetite loss, sleeplessness, impaired social and intellectual development
-Dwarfism - physical underdevelopment

42
Q

Aim of Bowlby’s 44 thieves case study on maternal deprivation

A

Aim: to investigate the relationship between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy

43
Q

Procedure of Bowlby’s 44 thieves case study on maternal deprivation

A

Procedure: Opportunistic sample of 88 children, on group of 44 juvenile thieves and other group who are not juveniles but had emotional problems, were interviewed to asses their social conscience and family history, control group not interviewed but history was examined

44
Q

Findings of Bowlby’s 44 thieves case study on maternal deprivation

A

Findings: 14 of the 44 thieves identified as affectionless psychopaths (none from the control group), 12 of the 14 had experienced prolonged maternal separate before 5 years old, only 2 of the 44 in the control group had experienced prolonged early separation from their mother

45
Q

Conclusion of Bowlby’s 44 thieves case study on maternal deprivation

A

Conclusion: early prolonged separation leads to a lack of emotional development leading to affectionless psychopathy, where individuals display a lack of concern for others, cannot admit guilt and are unable to form meaningful relationships

46
Q

Bowlby’s 44 thieves case study on maternal deprivation evaluation

A

Bowlby evaluation:
+ = Practical application in real life -> greater stability in childcare practise, hospital visiting hours reviewed so children maintain contact with parents etc
- = Retrospective recall may be inaccurate -> responses may have been inaccurate as it would have been experienced years earlier
- = investigator effects as Bowlby self-reported -> researcher confirmation bias
- = Oversimplified concept

47
Q

How do early relationships affect later development?

A

The quality of a child’s first attachment is crucial because it forms a template that affects the nature of future relationships

48
Q

Hazen and Shaver (1987) aim and procedure

A

Aim: to investigate impact of early attachment on later life adult behaviour
Procedure: Posted in American newspaper with 620 replies, first assessed respondent current or most important relationship, second assessed general love experience, third assessment looked at attachment type, by choosing three statements that describe them

49
Q

Hazen and Shaver (1987) Findings

A

Findings: 50% identified as secure, 25% insecure avoidant, 19% insecure resistant, secure had good longer lasting relationships, avoidant tend to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy

50
Q

Hazen and Shaver (1987) / internal working model of attachment evaluation

A

Hazen and Shaver (1987) / internal working model of attachment evaluation:
+ = securely attached infants were found to have positive, long lasting relationships whereas insecurely attached infants had higher divorce rates
- = cannot account for causality, environmental factors such as parenting styles need to be taken into account
- = retrospective data – data used for the studies relies on participants memories, high chance of inaccuracy
- = ethnocentric -> only americans
- = self reported so answers may have been changed to sound socially desirable

51
Q

Who studied romanian orphans to see the effect of insitutionalism?

A

Rutter investigated in Romanian Orphanages (1998)

52
Q

Rutter’s romanian orphan study procedure (1998)

A

Rutter’s romanian orphan study procedure (1998):
-Studied Romanian orphans aged 1-2 weeks old
-Longitudinal study using 100+ orphans – all adopted at different ages (58 before 6 months, 59 between 6-24 months, 48 adopted between 2-4 years)

53
Q

Rutter’s romanian orphan study findings (1998)

A

Rutter’s romanian orphan study findings (1998):
-Those adopted by British families before 6 months showed normal emotional development compared to UK children adopted at the same age
-Majority adopted after 6 months showed a disinhibited attachment eg attention seeking, lack of stranger anxiety, inappropriate physical contact
-Mental retardation also present in the children upon entering England

54
Q

Effects of insitutionalisation

A

Effects of institutionalisation:
-Disinhibited attachment – having multiple caregivers in an orphanage means they cannot form a secure attachment
-Mental retardation – significantly low intellectual capabilities

55
Q

Rutter’s romanian orphan study evaluation

A

Rutter’s romanian orphan study evaluation:
+ = Real life application -> orphanages and children’s homes now avoid having large numbers of caregivers per child
+ = fever extraneous variables -> Romanian orphanages there from birth -> internal validity
- = Generalisability -> low -> as these particular orphans suffered severe poor emotional and intellectual stimulation that other orphanages may not have
- = potential long-term effects on the children

56
Q

Mary Ainsworth strange situation study aim

A

Mary Ainsworth strange situation study aim:
To see how infants aged 9-18 months behave under coniditions of mild stress and also novelty

57
Q

Mary Ainsworth strange situation study procedure

A

Mary Ainsworth strange situation study procedure:
-Controlled observation
–8 pre-determined stages:
Stage 1: mother and child enter the playroom
Stage 2: the child is encouraged to explore
Stage 3: stranger enters and attempts to interact
Stage 4: Mothers leave while the stranger is present
Stage 5: Mother enters and the stranger leaves
Stage 6: Mothers leaves
Stage 7: Stranger returns
Stage 8: Mother returns to interact with child and stranger leaves

58
Q

Main behaviours observed in the Mary Ainsworth strange situation study

A

Main behaviours were observed: exploration behaviour, proximity seeking, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, reunion behaviour

59
Q

Behaviours displayed that affects security of attachments

A

Behaviours displayed that affects security of attachments:
-Proximity and contacting seeking
-Contact maintaining
-Avoidance of proximity and contact
-Resistance to contact and comforting

60
Q

Mary Ainsworth strange situation findings

A

Mary Ainsworth strange situation findings:
-Identified three main attachment styles = secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant

61
Q

Conclusion of Mary Ainsworth strange situation study

A

Conclusion of Mary Ainsworth strange situation study :
-Suggested the ‘caregiver sensitivity hypothesis’ to explain different attachment types -> depends on mother’s behaviour eg sensitivity levels

62
Q

Mary Ainsworth strange study positive evaluations

A

Mary Ainsworth strange study positive evaluations:
+ = Other researchers around the world have found very similar to Ainsworth in terms of attachment types
+ = There is strong evidence for the impact attachment types have on later relationships: Bowlby’s Continuity Theory, Hazan and Shaver’s Love Quiz, and Sroufe’s study of institutionalised women are just a few

63
Q

Mary Ainsworth Strange Situation study negative evaluation

A

Mary Ainsworth Strange Situation study negative evaluation:
- = Is it too reductionist to assume that the whole population fits into one of the three attachment styles
- = These infants often froze in the strange situation or displayed completely random behaviours that the existing categories from Ainsworth did not cover
- = Main categorised them as Type D: Disorganised and it was found that these were children who had suffered some form of abuse in early infancy - The fact that a 4th category was found some 16 years after the original raises issues about what else may have been missed

64
Q

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg’s (1988) study

A

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg’s (1988) study:
-Meta-analysis of 8 countries, cultural variations of Ainsworth’s strange situation study - findings were consistent with Ainsworth
+ = Standardised methodology
- = Misleading findings as most were conducted in USA
- = Ethnocentric = behaviour is judged against an American Standard

65
Q

What is an internal working model?

A

An internal working model is a mental representation of our relationship with our primary caregiver that becomes a template for future relationships

66
Q

Proximity-seeking behaviour

A

Bowlby suggested that attachment is a vital adaptive quality that has evolved to increase the chance of survival through proximity-seeking behaviour

67
Q

Bowlby monotropic theory evaluation

A

+ = monotropy universal -> supporting evidence -> Ainsworth Uganda study - infants from one primary attachment even when surrounded by multiple carers
- = monotropy importance overemphasised -> eg Van Ijzendoorn argued network of adults can provide better care than a single parent to meet all a child’s needs

68
Q

Secure attachment

A

Secure attachment: infants happy to explore surroundings, distressed when PCG leaves, avoided stranger (stranger anxiety), happy on reunion with PCG

69
Q

Insecure resistant attachment

A

Insecure resistant attachment:
-Did not explore surroundings
-Reluctant to leave PCG’s side
-Stranger anxiety
-Ignores PCG’s comfort when upset

70
Q

Insecure avoidant attachment

A

Insecure avoidant attachment:
-Happy to explore but did not refer to PCG
-No signs of distress when PCG leaves
-No stranger anxiety
-Ignores PCG upon reunion to continue with what they are doing

71
Q

What has research found about the role of the father?

A

What has research found about the role of the father? :
→ Grossman → fathers playstyle was based on his internal working model
→ Field → fathers tended to play more and hold the baby less based on videotapes, but it depended on wether they were primary or secondary caregiver