Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Reciprocity

A

Caregiver–infant interaction is reciprocal, i.e. each person’s interactions affect the other. Turn-taking, e.g. caregiver does an action, baby responds, then caregiver etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Internal Synchrony

A

Caregiver and infant signals synchronise, i.e. they occur together (‘mirroring’).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 4 stages of attatchment

A

Asocial
Indiscriminate Attachments
Descriminate (specific) attachments
Multiple Attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does a child enter / leave the asocial stage of attatchment

A

From birth to two months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens in the asocial stage of attatchment

A

An infant views people and objects as the same, although shows a preference for faces / eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When does the indiscriminate attchment stage of attatchemnt occur / end

A

From two to six months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens in the indiscriminate stage of attachment

A

Infant shows preference for humans over non-humans. They can tell differences between humans, but can be comforted by anyone. Stranger anxiety isn’t present yet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does the discriminate stage of attachment occur / end

A

From seven to twelve months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens in the discriminate stage of attachment

A

An infant shows preference for one caregiver, displaying stranger and separation anxiety. The infant looks to one person for security and protection. The infant shows joy upon reunion and are comforted by their primary caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When does the multiple attachments stage of attachment begin

A

One year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens in the multiple attachments stage of attachment

A

Attachment behaviours are now displayed toward several different people (e.g. siblings, grandparents) and are often referred to as secondary attachment. These attachments typically form in the first month after the primary attachment is formed. The number of these attachments and how they develop is dependant on the social circle the children are exposed to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What key study examines the formation of early attachments

A

Schaffer and Emerson (1964)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give a brief overview of the Schaffer and Emerson study

A

Sample of 60 babies (29F. 31M) from Glasgow working class. Checked up on the children every months for 12 months and observed. about separation and stranger anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the results of the Schaffer and Emerson study

A

At 25-32 weeks, 50% of children showed seperation anxiety.
By 40 weeks, 80% of children had a specific attachment, and 30% had formed multiple attachments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate the Schaffer and Emerson study

A

+ High external validity
- Low population validity
- Social bias, mums were interviewed so may have made things up to seem like better parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Geiger (1996) say about the role of the father

A

That children see the father as a playmate, and the mother is seen as more nuturing and sensitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Belsky et al. (2009) say about the role of the father

A

Fathers with higher levels of marital intimacy also displayed a secure father-infant attachment. Fathers can have positive relationships with their children, but only if their relationship with the mother is positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Lorenz study

A

Imprinting in non-human animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe Lorenz’s study

A

Randomly divided geese eggs into two groups - one was hatched naturally by the mother, and the other were incubated making sure Lorenz was the first thing they saw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe the results of Lorenz’s study

A

The naturally hatched geese followed the mum, but the incubated ones followed Lorenz. Even when mixed together, the geese followed the parent they imprinted on, showing no attachment to biological mother in case of the incubated.

21
Q

Describe the conclusion of Lorenz’s study

A

Imprinting only occurs within a critical period of 4-25 hours after hatching, this is irreversible

22
Q

Evaluate Lorenz’s study

A
  • Only studied non-human animals, can’t be generalised to us
  • Later research disproves this. Guiton et al. imprinted chickens on yellow gloves, but later reversed this change. Said that this was not irreversible
23
Q

What did Harlow study

A

To see whether baby monkeys would choose food over comfort

24
Q

Describe Harlow’s study

A

Sixteen baby rhesus monkeys, 4 conditions.
1. wire mother dispensing milk, cloth mother no milk
2. wire mother no milk, cloth mother dispensing milk
3. wire mother dispensing milk
4. cloth mother dispensing milk

25
Q

Describe the results of Harlow’s study

A

Harlow discovered that babies always chose the comfort of the mother over milk from the wire mother.

26
Q

What was the conclusion of Harlow’s study

A

Attachment is formed through an emotional need for security rather than food.

27
Q

Evalulate Harlow’s study

A

+ Provided useful insight into attachment for the real world
- Heavily unethical study
- not easily applicable to humans as animals, although monkeys aren’t that unrelated to humans

28
Q

Describe the Learning Theory

A

Children attach through classical or operant conditioning. Says that we only attach for food.

29
Q

Describe Classical Conditioning

A
  1. Before conditioning, food is an unconditioned stimulus with produces an unconditioned response (relief from hunger)
  2. Before conditioning, the caregiver is a neutral stimulus who provides no response.
  3. During conditioning, the child associates the caregiver who feeds them with the food
  4. After conditioning, the baby now associates the caregiver (conditioned stimulus) with the pleasure from being fed (conditioned response), and now there is an attachment between them.
30
Q

Describe Operant Conditioning

A

People or animals learn through consequences (either rewards or punishment)

31
Q

What is Bowlby’s theory of attachment

A

Argues that children are born with an innate tendency to form attachments with their parents in order to increase chances of survival

32
Q

What are the 5 key terms of Bowlby’s theory of attachment

A

Adapative
Social Releasers
Critical Period
Monotropy
Internal Working Model

33
Q

What does the Adaptive in Bowlby’s Theory of attachment mean

A

Attachments are adaptive, as they give humans an advantage to survive

34
Q

What does the Social Releasers point in Bowlby’s Theory of attachment mean

A

Infants have innate social releasers, which causes caregivers to take care of them. There are two types:
1. physical - cute face to get attention
2. behavioural - crying to get attention

35
Q

What does the Critical period point in Bowlby’s Theory of attachment mean

A

Infants must form an attachment with their caregiver during the critical period (between 3 and 6 months). If this isn’t done, the child will suffer irreversible physical and mental damage.

36
Q

What does the Monotropy point in Bowlby’s Theory of attachment mean

A

Infants form one very special attachment (usually with their mother)

37
Q

What does the Internal Working Model point in Bowlby’s Theory of attachment mean

A

Through the monotropic attachment the child will form an internal working model. This is a template for future relationship expectations. The better attachment with the primary figure, the better relationships will be later in life

38
Q

Evaluate Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment

A

+ Lorenz’s study supports the critical period
+ Hazan and Shaver’s work supported the Internal working model
- Schaffer and Emerson disagreed with monotropy

39
Q

What did Ainsworth’s strange situation study examine

A

Separation and stranger anxiety, reunion behaviour

40
Q

What happens in Ainsworth’s strange situation experiment

A

Mother and baby in room, there are various stages which consist of a stranger entering the room, the mother then leaving, the baby being on its own and the mother reuniting with the baby.

41
Q

Evaluate Ainsowrth’s strange situation

A
  • Low ecological validity, done in a highly controlled and artificial setting
  • Low internal validity, parents knew they were being observed
42
Q

What are the 3 types of attachment

A

Secure
Insecure-Resistant
Insecure-Avoidant

43
Q

What does a secure attachment look like

A

Explores but often returns to mother as safe base
Moderate seperation / stranger anxiety
Shows joy on reunion

44
Q

What does an Insecure-Resistant attachment look like

A

Doesn’t explore environment, clingy
High separation / stranger anxiety
Seeks but rejects mother’s comfort on reunion

45
Q

What does an Insecure-Avoidant attachment

A

Explores environment but doesn’t return to mother
Low stranger / separation anxiety
Shows little reaction upon reunion, avoid intimacy

46
Q

What did van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) study

A

Cultural variations in attachment

47
Q

cultural variations in attachment

What happened in van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) study

A

Meta-Analysis of 32 studies from eight countries which uses Ainsworth’s strange situation

48
Q

Cultural variations

What did the results of van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) study show

A

Secure attachments are the most common
Japan showed higher levels of insecure-resistant attachments
Germany showed higher levels of insecure-avoidant attachments

49
Q

cultural variations

Evauluate van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)

A