Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions- AO1

A
  • Reciprocity=when caregiver and baby respond to each others signals and elicit a response back
    Alert phases:
    Baby signals when ready for interaction- mother picks up on this 2/3 of time- from 3 months=increasingly frequent
    Active involvement:
    Both caregiver and baby initiate interactions and take turns doing so- Brazelton=dance
  • Interactional synchrony=temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour
    Synchrony begins:
    Meltzoff+Moore=as young as two weeks- adult=one of three facial expressions and baby response mirrored them more than chance predicted
    Importance for attachment:
    Isabella=high levels synchrony=better quality attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions- AO3

A
  • Filmed observations +
    Extraneous variables controlled
    Recorded and analysed later
    Inter-rater reliability
    Behaviour will not change
    Good reliability and validity
  • Difficulty observing babies -
    Movements observed=small and subtle
    Cannot determine what has caused the movement or what is occurring from babies perspective
    Cannot be certain has special meaning
  • Developmental importance -
    Feldman- synchrony and reciprocity can be reliably observed but not useful in understanding child development
    Do not know purpose of behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Schaffer’s Stages Of Attachment- AO1

A
  • Schaffer+Emerson=different infant behaviours linked to specific ages, all babies going through them in same order
  • Stage 1: Asocial (first few weeks)
    Behaviour toward human and objects=similar
    Prefer to be with (familiar) people
  • Stage 2: Indiscriminate (2-7months)
    More obvious/observable behaviours
    Preference humans over objects
    Accept comfort from anyone
    No separation/stranger anxiety
  • Stage 3: Specific (7months)
    Primary attachment figure to person who offers most interaction- mother in 65% of cases
    Stranger and separation anxiety
  • Stage 4: Multiple (by age 1)
    Secondary attachment figures
    Schaffer+Emerson=29% form secondary attachments within month of primary attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Schaffer’s Stages Of Attachment- AO3

A
  • Good external validity +
    Observations made by parents and reported to researchers
    No researchers present which would have distracted babies
    Participants behaved naturally
  • Poor evidence for asocial stage -
    Poor co-ordination and immobile=hard to observe anxiety
    Cannot observe and report back accurate information
    Might be social but appeared asocial
  • Real-world application +
    Asocial and indiscriminate=day care straightforward as can be comforted by anyone
    Starting day care with unfamiliar adult=problematic in specific stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Role Of The Father- AO1

A
  • Father=anyone who takes on role of main male caregiver
  • Attachment to fathers:
    Schaffer+Emerson=3% cases was father primary attachment- 27% cases was father joint primary with mother
    75% attachment with father by 18 months
  • Distinctive role for fathers:
    Grossmann=longitudinal study- attachment quality with mother related to attachment in adolescence=attachment to fathers less important
    Quality of fathers play related quality of attachment=fathers have role of stimulation over emotion
  • Fathers as primary attachment figures:
    Fathers able take on emotional role for primary attachment
    Field=primary caregiver father=more time holding baby than secondary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Role Of The Father- AO3

A
  • Confusion over research questions -
    Some concerned with role of father as primary (distinct role) and others as secondary (maternal role) attachment figure
    Depends what role being discussed
  • Conflicting evidence -
    Grossmann=father have stimulation role
    Expect single-mother children to be different from those who have father
    These children do not develop differently
  • Real-world application +
    Mothers pressured stay at home and fathers pressured go to work
    Reassuring advice as any parent can be primary attachment figure
    Parental anxiety can be reduced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Animal Studies Of Attachment- Lorenz- AO1

A
  • Imprinting=bird species mobile from birth attach to and follow first moving thing they see
  • Experiment=half goose eggs hatched with mother and half in incubator when first moving thing saw=Lorenz
  • Findings=incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere and control group followed mother
    Critical period=brief as few hours after hatching
    If imprinting does not occur=no attachment to mother figure
  • Sexual imprinting
    Lorenz- peacock reared in reptile house where first moving object=giant tortoise
    Peacock only courtship behaviour toward giant tortoises
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Animal Studies Of Attachment- Lorenz- AO3

A
  • Research support +
    Regolin+Vallortigara=chicks exposed simple moving shape combinations
    Would follow original most closely
    Young animals=innate mechanism imprint on moving object present in critical window development
  • Generalisability to humans -
    Mammalian attachment system=different and more complex to birds
    Two-way process=mothers also show emotional attachment to young
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Animal Studies Of Attachment- Harlow- AO1

A
  • Experiment=reared 16 rhesus monkeys with two wire model mothers
    Milk dispensed by plain wire mother/by cloth-covered mother
  • Findings=cuddled cloth mother and sought comfort from them regardless of who dispensed milk
    Contact comfort more important than food
  • Maternally deprived monkeys as adults
    Plain wire mothers=most dysfunctional
    Aggressive / unsociable / bred less often / neglected young and even killed some
  • Critical period=within 90 days
    Attachment impossible after this and maternal deprivation irreversible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Animal Studies Of Attachment- Harlow- AO3

A
  • Real-world value +
    Helped social workers/clinal psychologists understand lack of bonding=risk factor in development
    Importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys
  • Generalisability to humans -
    More similar to humans than Lorenz’s geese
    Human brain and behaviour more complex than that of monkeys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explanations Of Attachment- Learning Theory- AO1

A
  • Dollard+Miller= behaviourism / ‘cupboard love’=importance of attachment figure as provider of food
  • Classical conditioning (association)
    UCS(food) -> UCR(pleasure)
    UCS(food) + NS(caregiver) -> UCR(pleasure)
    CS(caregiver) -> CR(pleasure)
  • Operant conditioning (consequences)
    Comforting a child when crying=positive reinforcement
    When baby stops crying after comforting=negative reinforcement
    Interplay of mutual reinforcement strengthens attachment
  • Attachment as secondary drive
    Hunger=primary drive- innate motivator
    Sears- attachment=secondary drive- association between caregiver and satisfaction of primary drive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explanations Of Attachment- Learning Theory- AO3

A
  • Counter-evidence from animal studies -
    Lorenz’s geese imprinted on first moving object, regardless whether associated with food
    Harlow’s monkeys attached due to contact comfort and not who provided milk
  • Counter-evidence from studies on humans -
    Schaffer+Emerson=babies main attachment is mother regardless of whether she fed them
    Isabella=high synchrony=high quality of attachment
    Food not main factor in attachment
  • Some conditioning may be involved +
    Baby may associate warmth and comfort with presence of specific adult=determine choice of main attachment figure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explanations Of Attachment- Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory- AO1

A
  • Evolutionary explanation- attachment=innate system gives survival advantage
  • Monotropy=one particular attachment(mother) different to others and of central importance to child’s development
    Law of continuity:
    More constant and predictable child’s care=better quality attachment
    Law of accumulated separation:
    Effects of every separation add up and safest dose=zero dose(Bowlby)
  • Social releases and critical period
    Social releasers=innate cute behaviours encourage attention from adults=social interaction
    Critical period=six months
    Sensitive period=6months-2 years
    If not formed in this time, becomes much harder
  • Internal working model=mental representation of relationships that serve as model for future relationships
    Affects child’s later ability to parent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explanations Of Attachment- Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory- AO3

A
  • Validity of monotropy challenged -
    Schaffer+Emerson=most attached to one person first, minority=multiple attachments at same time
    First attachment may be stronger not different in quality
  • Support for social releasers +
    Brazelton=babies trigger interactions using social releasers
    Encouraged to ignore social releasers=babies distressed/lay motionless
    Important in process of attachment
  • Support for internal working model +
    Bailey=attachment relationships in 99 mothers and 1 year olds
    Mothers with poor attachment to own primary attachments=poorly attached babies
    Influenced by internal working models
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types Of Attachment- AO1

A
  • Ainsworth’s strange situation
  • Controlled observation with two way mirrors- 7 stages, 3 minutes each=21 minutes total
    1. Baby explores=exploration/secure base
    2. Stranger enters=stranger anxiety
    3. Caregiver leaves=separation and stranger anxiety
    4. Caregiver returns/stranger leaves=reunion behaviour and exploration/secure base
    5. Caregiver leaves=separation anxiety
    6. Stranger returns=stranger anxiety
    7. Caregiver returns=reunion behaviour
  • Secure (type B)
    Mod proximity/secure base / mod separation/stranger anxiety / require/accept comfort
  • Insecure-avoidant (type A)
    Low proximity/secure base / low separation/stranger anxiety / avoid contact
  • Insecure-resistant (type C)
    High proximity / low exploration / high separation/stranger anxiety / resist comfort
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types Of Attachment- AO3

A
  • Good predictive validity +
    Type B=better outcomes than others
    Childhood=better achievement
    Adulthood=better mental health
    Type A/not any=worst outcomes
    Real and meaningful
  • Good (inter-rater)reliability +
    Bick=agreement on 94% cases
    Controlled conditions and behaviours easy to observe
    Attachment type does not depend on subjective judgements
  • The test may be culture-bound -
    Developed in Britain and USA (westernised)
    Different experiences and different cultures
    Takahashi=high separation anxiety=more type A=mother-baby separation very rare
17
Q

Cultural Variations In Attachment- AO1

A
  • van Ijzendoorn+Kroonenberg:
    32 strange situation studies
    15 in USA, overall 1990 children
    Meta-analysis
    Secure most common in all countries
    Individualist=I-R similar to Ainsworth but greater in collectivist
    Variations within country=150% greater than between countries
  • Italian study- Simonelli:
    76 babies strange situation
    50% secure (lower than Ainsworth)/ 36% I-A (higher)
    Mothers working long hours and use professional care
  • Korean study- Jin:
    87 babies strange situation
    Insecure and secure similar to other countries
    One I-A and others resistant=similar Japan
    Child-rearing style explains similarities
  • Conclusions:
    Secure=norm in wide range cultures=Bowlby- attachment=innate
    Cultural practices have influence on attachment type
18
Q

Cultural Variations In Attachment- AO3

A
  • Indigenous researchers +
    Same cultural background as participants
    Problems in cross-cultural research avoided=culture bias/language/communication
    Increases validity
  • Confounding variables -
    Not matched methodology when meta-analysed
    Age/social class/poverty/environmental variables
    Size of room/availability of toys
    May be classified as different attachment type
  • Imposed etic -
    Impose idea that works in one cultural context, to another
    Britain/USA-lack of affection on reunion=I-A
    Germany-independence rather than insecurity
    Comparing across cultures is meaningless
19
Q

Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation- AO1

A
  • Maternal deprivation=emotional and intellectual consequences of separation from mother- continuous care essential for normal development
  • Separation=not in presence
    Deprivation=of emotional care
  • Critical period=two and a half years old
    Sensitive period=five
  • Effects on development:
    =Intellectual- low IQ
    =Emotional- affectionless psychopathy=no guilt and remorse
  • Bowlby’s 44 thieves:
    14/44 affectionless psychopaths 12/14 prolonged separation in critical period
20
Q

Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation- AO3

A
  • Flawed evidence -
    Interviewer bias as knew which thieves expected signs psychopathy
    Goldfarb had confounding variables
  • Deprivation and privation -
    Rutter=deprivation is loss of PAF=privation is failure to form attachment in first place
    Long-term damage=privation
  • Critical vs sensitive period -
    Good quality aftercare can prevent most of damage after critical period
    Koluchova=twins severe abuse up until 7, excellent care and recovered by teens
21
Q

Romanian Orphan Studies: Institutionalisation- AO1

A
  • Rutter’s research:
    English and Romanian Adoptee Study- 165 orphans adopted by UK families / 52 UK adoptees control = development assessed longitudinally
    =mean IQ decreased along with age at which adopted
    =adopted after 6 months- disinhibited attachment
  • Zeanah’s research:
    Bucharest Early Intervention Project- 95 Romanian institutionalised children / 50 control = attachment type SS
    =74% control- secure
    =19% institutional- secure
    =44% institutional- disinhibited
    =20% control- disinhibited
  • Effects of institutionalisation:
    =disinhibited attachment- attention-seeking/clinginess = adaptation multiple caregivers in sensitive period
    =intellectual disability- most adopted before 6 months caught up by age 4
22
Q

Romanian Orphan Studies: Institutionalisation- AO3

A
  • Real-world application +
    Langton=understanding of institutional care and how to prevent effects
    Led to improvement in conditions- having one/two keyworkers
    Now considered undesirable option
  • Fewer confounding variables +
    Children from Romanian orphanages been handed over by loving parents who could not afford to keep them
    Higher internal validity
  • Lack of adult data -
    ERA study=children in their 20’s- do not know of long-term effects= mental health problems and maintaining relationships
    Long time to gather due to longitudinal nature
23
Q

Influence of Early Attachment on Later Relationships- AO1

A
  • Internal working model:
    =mental representations of relationships based on PAF affects future relationships
    =initial loving relationship leads to these in the future
  • Relationships in childhood:
    =securely attached babies form best quality childhood friendships- insecure form worst
    =Myron-Wilson+Smith: secure unlikely involved in bullying / I-A victims / I-R bullies
  • Relationships in adulthood:
    =McCarthy- 40 women securely attached babies=best friendships and romances- I-R cannot maintain friendships / I-A struggled with intimacy
    =Bailey- most women have same attachment types to their mothers and babies
24
Q

Influence of Early Attachment on Later Relationships- AO3

A
  • Research support +
    Fearon+Roisman=early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well-being and attachment to children
    Disorganised linked with later mental order
  • Validity issues with retrospective studies -
    Not longitudinal- ask participants about own attachments and types
    =relies on honesty and accurate perception
    =hard to know what is actually being assessed
  • Confounding variables -
    Studies have validity problems as associations affected by other variables
    Parenting style/genetically-influenced personality