Association and Causation Flashcards
If we find an association does that mean the exposure caused the outcome?
No
Why is cause and effect not that simple?
- outcomes often have multiple causes
- sometimes certain things have to happen together and/or in a certain order for an outcome to occur
Exposure 1 + Exposure 2 + Exposure 3 = Outcome
define a cause
an event, condition or characteristic [or a combination of these factors] that plays an essential role in producing an occurrence of the disease
Describe the components of the causal pie model
This model is a concept that can help to explain te different types of causes, and helps with thinking about preventions
Whole ‘pie’ = sufficient cause
- Together, these exposures are sufficient to cause the outcome
- So we call the whole pie a sufficient cause of the outcome
- Each exposure is a component of the sufficient cause
- So we call each of the exposures a component cause
Shows the components of a sufficient cause for an outcome
For many health conditions there are multiple sufficient causes, how do pie models help here?
Can look at the sufficient causes separately and see what makes them up.
- if there is the same component cause in multiple of the sufficient cause pie things then by eliminating that component cause you can get rid of a percentage of the cases of that disease
- the component cause that is in the most sufficient causes should be the one you eliminate first because it will get rid of more of the cases of disease
- the totals of the component causes together will make up more than 100% most of the time because they can be part of more than one sufficient cause
eg. Suf. cause 1 = 50% of the cases of disease
Suf. cause 2 = 30% of the cases of disease
Suf. cause 3 = 20% of the cases of disease
If the same component cause is in Suf cause 1 and 2 and you eliminate it, then you get rid of 80% of the cases of disease
describe a necessary cause: the prevention ideal
- a component cause which is necessary for the disease to occur
- it must be part of every sufficient cause
- if you eliminate it, then you eliminate all cases of disease (because you get rid of all the sufficient causes)
describe the complexity of causes
- reality is often complex
- different combination of exposures may lea to the same outcome
- the cause of a disease may not be the last thing that preceded it
how do we determine causation?
- needs to be an association
- but that doesn’t necessarily mean it is casual, still need to consider is the association a valid association (or is it sure to chance, bias or confounding?)
- how do we determine if something is causal? judgement is required (using the guidelines - which are used to make a judgement based on the TOTALITY of evidence, they are not absolute requirements to be met)
Describe guideline 1. Biological plausibility
Is there a plausible mechanism for the association (doesn’t necessarily mean on the cellular level)?
- (but epidemiological knowledge may precede knowledge on biological mechanisms)
Describe guideline 2. experimental evidence
Is there evidence from human RCTs or animal experiments?
- however animal studies might not apply to humans
Describe guideline 3. Specificity
Is the exposure specifically association with a particular outcome but not others>
- however, it is quite common for exposures to be related to many outcomes (and vice versa)
**don’t confuse this with specificity in screening
Describe guideline 4. temporal sequencing
for something to be causal, the exposure must come BEFORE the outcome
Describe guideline 5. consistency
are the findings consistent with findings from other studies?
- however, there can be a number of reasons why studies might have different findings (so up to your judgement but must explain)
Describe guideline 6. dose-response relationship
Does the risk of the outcome change with increasing or decreasing amounts of the exposure?
- but not all relationships are linear (so sometimes can’t do this depending on what you are measuring)
Describe guideline 7. strength of association
The stronger the association, the less likely it is to be due to confounding or bias
- however, this is not always the case eg. if confounding is very strong
According to textbook:
RR of 2 could be considered moderately strong
RR of 5 could be considered as strong
- but even a relationship that is not strong could be important