Association and Causation Flashcards

1
Q

If we find an association does that mean the exposure caused the outcome?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is cause and effect not that simple?

A
  • outcomes often have multiple causes
  • sometimes certain things have to happen together and/or in a certain order for an outcome to occur

Exposure 1 + Exposure 2 + Exposure 3 = Outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define a cause

A

an event, condition or characteristic [or a combination of these factors] that plays an essential role in producing an occurrence of the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the components of the causal pie model

A

This model is a concept that can help to explain te different types of causes, and helps with thinking about preventions
Whole ‘pie’ = sufficient cause
- Together, these exposures are sufficient to cause the outcome
- So we call the whole pie a sufficient cause of the outcome
- Each exposure is a component of the sufficient cause
- So we call each of the exposures a component cause

Shows the components of a sufficient cause for an outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For many health conditions there are multiple sufficient causes, how do pie models help here?

A

Can look at the sufficient causes separately and see what makes them up.
- if there is the same component cause in multiple of the sufficient cause pie things then by eliminating that component cause you can get rid of a percentage of the cases of that disease
- the component cause that is in the most sufficient causes should be the one you eliminate first because it will get rid of more of the cases of disease
- the totals of the component causes together will make up more than 100% most of the time because they can be part of more than one sufficient cause

eg. Suf. cause 1 = 50% of the cases of disease
Suf. cause 2 = 30% of the cases of disease
Suf. cause 3 = 20% of the cases of disease
If the same component cause is in Suf cause 1 and 2 and you eliminate it, then you get rid of 80% of the cases of disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe a necessary cause: the prevention ideal

A
  • a component cause which is necessary for the disease to occur
  • it must be part of every sufficient cause
  • if you eliminate it, then you eliminate all cases of disease (because you get rid of all the sufficient causes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe the complexity of causes

A
  • reality is often complex
  • different combination of exposures may lea to the same outcome
  • the cause of a disease may not be the last thing that preceded it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how do we determine causation?

A
  • needs to be an association
  • but that doesn’t necessarily mean it is casual, still need to consider is the association a valid association (or is it sure to chance, bias or confounding?)
  • how do we determine if something is causal? judgement is required (using the guidelines - which are used to make a judgement based on the TOTALITY of evidence, they are not absolute requirements to be met)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe guideline 1. Biological plausibility

A

Is there a plausible mechanism for the association (doesn’t necessarily mean on the cellular level)?
- (but epidemiological knowledge may precede knowledge on biological mechanisms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe guideline 2. experimental evidence

A

Is there evidence from human RCTs or animal experiments?
- however animal studies might not apply to humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe guideline 3. Specificity

A

Is the exposure specifically association with a particular outcome but not others>
- however, it is quite common for exposures to be related to many outcomes (and vice versa)

**don’t confuse this with specificity in screening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe guideline 4. temporal sequencing

A

for something to be causal, the exposure must come BEFORE the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe guideline 5. consistency

A

are the findings consistent with findings from other studies?
- however, there can be a number of reasons why studies might have different findings (so up to your judgement but must explain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe guideline 6. dose-response relationship

A

Does the risk of the outcome change with increasing or decreasing amounts of the exposure?
- but not all relationships are linear (so sometimes can’t do this depending on what you are measuring)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe guideline 7. strength of association

A

The stronger the association, the less likely it is to be due to confounding or bias
- however, this is not always the case eg. if confounding is very strong

According to textbook:
RR of 2 could be considered moderately strong
RR of 5 could be considered as strong
- but even a relationship that is not strong could be important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the acronym for remembering the guidelines?

A

BEST CDS

17
Q

describe the use of guidelines

A

Consider them all and then make a judgement based on the totality of evidence
- is there any other way of explaining the set of facts before us, is there any other answer equally, or more likely than cause and effect?