Asset Allocation Flashcards
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Asset Allocation Approaches: Investment Objective
1. Asset Only:
- Use MVO,
- max port’s sharpe,
- diversification, correlations with other assets you hold and liquidity are also relevant
2. Liability Relative:
- duration, inflation and credit-risk should be closely monitored.
- Fund status impacts the risk profile b/w liability-hedging and return seeking (why increase risk if you are overfunded?).
3. Goal-based asset allocation:
- built into behavioral finance (mental accounting bias).
- Adds riskier assets that are accepted by the investor due to its context in the portfolio
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Super asset classes
as defined by Greer (1997)
1. Capital Assets - generates dividends, CF or interest - value determined by NPV (eg. stocks, bonds, etc)
2. Consumable/transformable assets - commodities that are transformed into something else (eg. petroleum)
3. Store of value assets - no income or economic value (eg. art, currencies, precious metals except in industrial application)
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criteria for specifying an Asset Class
Greer (1997)
1. Homogeneous - similar attributes
2. Mutually Exclusive - Overlapping is a problem (eg. Emerging mkt are a diff class)
3. Diversifying - ρ w/ other class > 0.95 = undesirable.
4. Must be representable
5. Capacity for allocation / Liquidity
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Expected Utility (MVO)
Um = E(Rm) − 0.005 * λ * σ2m
Certainty-equivalent return (comparable to the risk-free**)
where
λ = the investor’s risk aversion coefficient - investor’s risk-return trade-off (how much inv will forgo return for lowering risk). 0 = risk neutral 4 = risk moderate
DEIXAR O RESTANTE EM % MESMO > 14%² = 196
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
SFRatio vs Sortino Ratio
RSF = (RP – MinimumAcceptableReturn) / σP
Sortino = (RP – MinimumAcceptableReturn) / Downside Deviation
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
SFRatio
RSF = (RP – MinimumAcceptableReturn) / σP
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criticisms of MVO
- Highly concentrated / Too sensitive (large shifts w/ small changes)
- Assumes a normal distribution of returns.
- Diversification by asset class ≠ diversification by risk source
- Single-period model = ignores taxes, transaction costs, inflation or liabilities.
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criticisms of MVO
X Highly concentrated / Too sensitive (large shifts w/ small changes)
-
Reverse optimization - less dependent on estimates of return.
- Start with ρ, σ, and benchmark weights (or another optimal target).
- Then use MVO to solve for expected return by asset class.
-
Black-Litterman - less dependent on estimates of return and tends to include more classes
- Reverse optimization + Manager views to adjust MVO
-
Monte Carlo (Resampling) - deals directly with the uncertainty of estimating returns.
- It starts with MVO and the manager’s best estimates of return and other inputs.
- Then the return data is varied up and down (Monte Carlo). The avg EF of each allocation is selected.
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criticisms of MVO
Diversification by asset class ≠ diversification by risk source
- Factor-based allocation (i.e. mkt risk premium, mkt cap, value vs. growth, mkt momentum vs. mean reversion, duration, etc)
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criticisms of MVO
Assumes a normal distribution of returns.
Non-normal optimization
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Criticisms of MVO
Single-period model
- Goals based approach – suited to individuals w/ multiple goals (sub-portfolios)
- Liability-relative Asset Allocation – model liabilities as part of MVO and use Monte Carlo on how portfolio performs over time
- Surplus optimization: surplus efficient frontier (min Vol & max Er)
- “two-portfolio”: Hedging / Return seeking portfolio (for the surplus)
- Asset-liability approach (ALM): simultaneously alter charact. of assets and liabilities. Multi-period, more complex.
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
- *Risk Budgeting**
- “use risk efficiently in the* persuit of return”
Marginal Contribution to Risk (MCTR)
Absolute Contribution Total Risk (ACTR)
% Contribution to Total Risk
Ratio of Excess Return to MCTR
- *MCTR =** βAsset x σPortfolio
- Excess Return to MCTR = (Er - Rf) / MCTR*
- *ACTR =** WeightAsset x MCTR
- total sum is equal to the portfolio’s risk*
% Contribution to Total Risk = ACTR / Portfolio σ
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Optimal corridor size
(+) related to the optimal corridor size:
Risk Tolerance
Correlation of asset classes
Transaction Costs
(-) related to the optimal corridor size:
Volatile asset class
Volatile portfolio
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Heuristic asset allocation
5 strategies that simplify allocation
- 120 - age (exposure to equity)
- 60/40 stock/bond
- Endowment Model - large allocation to non-traditonal assets
- Risk Parity - distributes equally the risk b/w assets in a port
- The 1/N rule - equally weighted asset allocation (regret aversion)
•••••••Asset Allocation•••••••
Behavioral Biases in Asset Allocation
FILMAR
- Framing
- Illusion of Control
- Loss Aversion
- Mental Accounting
- Availability
- Representativeness