Assessing And Improving Validity Flashcards
What is validity
Whether a measuring instrument or study measures what it claims to (is it true / legit)
What is internal validity
A measure of whether results obtained are solely affected by changes in the variable being manipulated in a cause and effect relationship (e.g by the IV)
What is external validity
A measure of whether data can be generalised to other situations outside of the research environment
What are the 3 types of external validity
Ecological
Temporal
Population
What’s ecological validity
Extent to which psychologists can apply their findings to other settings e.g real life
Low = Usually a weakness of lab studies due to artificial stimuli and setting
What’s temporal validity
Extent to which research findings can be applied across time
What’s population validity
Extent to which research can be applied to diff groups of people
How can the validity of an experiment / test be assessed
Considering
Face validity
Concurrent validity
What’s face validity
‘Eyeballing’
Does the test appear to measure what it says it measures?
E.g, if a questionnaire measuring depression asks appropriate questions, have appropriate items that rep what it’s like to have depression
What is concurrent validity
Where the performance of the test in question is compared to a test that is already recognised and trusted in the same field
As both measures are looking to do the same thing, participants should score similar on each
How to improve validity in experiments
- Introduce single and double blind (gets rid of ppts or investigator effects)
- Using a control group to check if the IV acc affects the DV
- Use standardised instructions to minimise investigator effects
How to improve validity of questionnaires
- use a lie scale to check the consistency of the participants responses
Lie scale = 2 questions asking the same thing but in a diff way e.g. sleep is bad disagree to agree versus I sleep well disagree to agree
- ensure ppts know their answers r gonna be anonymous to reduce social desirability bias
How to improve the validity of observations
- covert observations
- using behavioural categories
- using qualitative methodology like case studies bc that has more ecological validity
Ez way to Inc validity
Guarantee anonymity so people give honest answers & not feel embarrassed
Make conditions less obvious