Article - Catching the Wave (Bower & Christensen) Flashcards
Why do leading companies often fail to stay at the top of their industries when technologies or markets change?
They fail to meet future demand from current and/or future.
–> They stay too close to their customer
In what way do customers have a lot of power regarding a companies’ investment?
- Before launching new technologies, market analysis into their current customers is done;
- They often reject ideas if those do not address their current needs as effectively as the current solution already on the market;
- > companies then often don’t pursue that technology while competitors do;
What are most well-managed good at in terms of innovations?
New innovations and incremental changes to current products if those innovations address the next-generation performance needs of their customers.
- > Their processes focus on identify customer needs, tech trends and the allocation of resources for current market and customers.
- > No focus on new technologies in emergent markets;
What are two characteristics of technology changes that damage established companies
- They present a different package of performance attributes (that are not valued by existing customers);
- The performance attributes that existing customers do value improve at such a rapid rate that the new technology can later invade those established markets. Only then the mainstream customer wants it, but it is too late for the established company and pioneers dominate the market.
What is a performance trajectory?
The rate at which the performance of a product has improved and is expected to improve over time.
This can be helpful to explain the differences of impact certain technological innovations have on given markets.
Example: In disk drives it is storage capacity.
What are sustaining technologies?
Technologies that tend to maintain a rate of improvement.
What are disruptive technologies?
Technologies that introduce a very different package of attributes compared to what mainstream customer historically value. These often perform worse on a few dimensions compared to current products.
What is an example of a disruptive technology?
Hard disks =
Frontiers made HDD smaller and smaller –> they were lighter, required less power etc. ; but had less storage (so perform worse) –> computer makers rejected them –> HDD suppliers rejected the disruptive technology –> the benefits did enable the frontiers to develop new markets (mini-computers etc.) –> innovation to increase storage –> original HDD suppliers are outplayed.
How can disruptive technology take over original markets as well?
If disruptive technologies become established in their new markets they can sustain innovation and increase the performance of their products.
What are the two reasons established companies steer away from disruptive technologies?
- Potential revenues look small;
2. It is difficult to project the market size over time;
What are two choices managers have regarding to pursue disruptive technologies?
- Go down-market
Accept lower profit margins of the emerging markets that disruptive technologies will initially serve. - Go up-market
Sustain your existing technologies and enter market segments with high profit margins (more immediate ROI –> but often companies do not see the threat from below)
Why do companies not break out of the pattern of not investing in disruptive technologies?
- Managers keep doing what they did in the past: serving the rapidly growing needs of their current customers;
- They have processes to allocate resources among proposed investments –> these do not allocate resources to programs that current customers do not want and that have low profit margins. (managers have to place their bets on safer investments to reduce risk and to safeguard their careers)
What are the five steps to spot and cultivate disruptive technologies?
- Determine whether the technology is disruptive or sustaining.
- Define the strategic significance of the disruptive technology
- Locate the initial market for the disruptive technology
- Place responsibility for building a disruptive technology business in an independent organization
- Keep the disruptive organization independent
How can a company determine if a technology is disruptive or sustaining?
By examining internal disagreements over the development of new products/technologies. Often marketing/finance is against, but if the best technical personnel insists it might be worth looking into it by top management.
What goes wrong when companies try to define the strategic significance of a disruptive technology?
They aks their important accounts, as they use their products to stay ahead of their own competition.
Those companies are however not interested in disruptive technologies as they initially have a lower performance than demanded by current customers.