Arguments for the existence of God based on OBSERVATION Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Cosmological argument?

A

Aims to prove God’s existence by saying God is the explanation for the origin of the universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which philosopher presented the five ways?

A

Aquinas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which book contains Aquinas’s five ways?

A

-Summa Theologica
-Attempted to harmonise the ideas from Aristotle with Christianity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name the first 3 ways.

A

-motion
-causation
-contingency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Aquinas’s first way?

A

-things being acted on and being changed
-things change because of this
-Infinite Regress is rejected
(‘but this cannot go on for infinity’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which way concludes:
There must be a unmoved mover which started the process of motus, God.

A

First Way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which Part of Aristotle’s Theory did Aquinas take influence from for his first way?

A

Everything is in a state from potentiality to actuality.
e.g Kettle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a difference between Aquinas and Aristotle (first way)?

A

AQUINAS=God’s deliberate act of will
ARISTOTLE=PM unknowingly acts by attraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Aquinas’s second way about?

A

-Things acting and bringing about change
-Structured in a similar manner to the first way
-suggests all effects come from cause this cannot be infinite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which way concludes:
Therefore there must be a uncaused causer,God.

A

The second way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Aquinas’s third way about?

A

-if all things are contingent then that means at some point nothing would have existed
-Something necessary must have existed
(‘There must exist something who’s is necessary’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which way concludes:
Must be a being which itself is necessary.

A

The third way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Teleological Argument?

A

Using observations of certain features in the universe such as its ordered and purposefulness nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Aquinas’s Fifth way about?

A

-Things which lack knowledge act for a purpose
-All natural things have telos and this comes from god
-God guides all these things to achieve it’s purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Aquinas propose for his Fifth way?

A

The analogy of the Archer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Analogy of the Archer?

A

-Nature is like a arrow shot from it’s archer’s bow.
-Has direction and purpose and moves towards it goal
-Everything has a purposefulness nature

17
Q

What example can be used to help Aquinas for ‘everything has a purposefulness nature?

A

ACORN has the goal of being a oak tree
It will behave in a certain way to fulfil it purpose

18
Q

How did Aristotle influence Aquinas’s Fifth way?

A

-Teleological nature
-Take us of final cause
HOWEVER, he rejects that purpose comes naturally and argues there must be a intelligent designer.

19
Q

Aside from Aquinas who also proposed a Teleological Argument?

A

Paley

20
Q

Why did Paley Write his own?

A

-During the time Paley was writing teleological arguments were at the height of there popularity due to scientific advancements
-mechanical analogies were also being made due to the industrial revolution

21
Q

What analogy did Paley put forwards to show complexity in the universe?

A

The analogy of the watchmaker

22
Q

Explain Paley’s Watchmaker analogy.-

A

-There are things which do not seek purpose,
-however sometimes we create explanation in terms of design we don’t imagine they come naturally.
-He uses the watch’s complexity to suggests there is purpose.
-for example we are aware that it has been constructed intentionally to carry out purpose.

23
Q

What does Paley propose for the nature of God?

A

Analogy of the eye.

24
Q

Explain the analogy of the eye?

A

-The eye is safely tucked away in the sockets of a skull
-He uses this to show that not only god makes intricate thins but also cares for them
-He made this to conclude that it is a theistic God,ombnibenevolance

25
Q

What goes against his eye analogy?

A

The Disteleological argument.
Eye Problems

26
Q

What is Design Qua Purpose

A

-The watch is complex and ordered
-without the features it wouldn’t be able to function
-The watch didnt come from chance e.g stone
-Assume that it has a designer which is a watchmaker

27
Q

What is Design Qua Regularity?

A

-Was inspired by Newtons law of motion and Gravity
-Universe is like clockwork it is in a predictable pattern
-Orbit of planets is so regular
-Therefore there must be a higher power GOD

28
Q

Who studies Paley’s work and challenges using chance?

A

Charles Darwin

29
Q

What did Charles Darwin say?

A

-Evolution creates a illusion of design
-Natural selection of Finches on Galapagos Islands
-beaks were all shaped differently depending on food course on island
-Those finches with less successful beaks would die out to leave the successful ones to adapt

30
Q

Why does Charles Darwin’s use of natural selection challenge the teleological Argument?

A

It is nature against nature so therefore survival is creating the change.