Archy 329 Midterm 1 review Flashcards

1
Q

epistemology

A

branch of philosphy concerned with the nature, scope, and limitations of knowledge (“awareness of facts”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

assumptions of science

A

there is a real and knowable universe

the universe operates according to laws

the law are immutable (stay constant usually no matter where or when)

the laws can be studied, revealed, and understood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what questions does epistemology adress

A
  1. what is knowledge
  2. how is knowledge acquired
  3. how do we know what we know, in archy or any other field of science
  4. how does anyybody know anything to be actual truthful or real
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the scientific process

A

observation

induction

deduction

testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is observation

A

process of receiving knowledge of the natural world using our senses or recording information via scientifc tools or instruments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is induction

A

arguing from specific observations to generalities to form probable conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is deduction

A

arguing from generalities to specifics to form certain conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is testing

A

use of scientific methods to form inferences (hypotheses) about phenomena and deduce and predict more observable facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what two things are hypotheses

A

falsifiable and testable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

science vs pseudoscience

A

science hypotheses are testable and falsifiable

science follows rules of logic and rules of evidence

pseudoscience doesnt do either of those things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

scientific debate: controversies within science

A

scientists do not always agree on the quality, relevance and interpretation of evidence used to support an assertion of fact

accumulated of informaiton to arrive at the best or most likely conclusion

aplways open to scrutiny, continued research

hypothesis

theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hypothesis

A

an assertion about the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

theory

A

a hypothesis that has been extensively tested and has yet to be proven false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ignaz Semmelweis, what did he do

A

the two hospitals in vienna, fixed childbed fever issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were ignaz semmelweis’ hypotheses for the problems and what was the results

A

overcrowding, no change

position while giving birth, no change

women upset by priest giving last rites, no change

student doctors rough than experienced ones, no change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was ignaz semmelweis’ final discovery and solution

A

his friend died from similar symptons to the childbed fever while he was accidentally cut during an autopsy, he discovered that something in the dead bodies was being transmitted to the mothers because doctors werent washing their hands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

psuedoscience checklist

A

does the source cite “experts” who make polit innocuous, but otherwise meaningless statmeents about the artifact in question

does the source cite “experts” but exagerate their credentials (PhD’s from uncredited institutions

does the source cite experts whose credentials are unrelated to the claims being made (einstein was science not geologist)

does the source cite experts whose previous extreme claims/ unethical behavior are not mentioned or cited

does the source make definitive statements about age of artificant without any supporting data

does the source make what appear to be definitve stateents about the culture of the artifact without any supporting data

does the source make arguments about the artifact that that make little or no sense but sound authoritative

does the source make assertions about appearance of an artifact that has very little relationship to what’s there (pareidolia)

does the source preface most claims with phrases like “maybe” “if” or “image” “could be” or perhaps” and then present detailed scenarious about antiquity, all of which require acceptance of the original speculation which is never tested or proven

does the source make demands such as “if i am wrong let the scientists prove it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

pareidolia

A

tendency to perceive a specific, often meaningful image in a random or ambiguous visual pattern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what do extraordinary claims require

A

extraordinary evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

popular claims of ancient giants

A

nine ten feet tall, maybe even 20-30 feet

these giants might be the philim referred to in the old testament as the offspring between fallen angels and humans

or maybe the watchers, talking about in the Book of Enoch, written about 2,300 years ago

20
Q

setting of cardiff giant

A

Several years after the American Civil Ware, a Hamlet call Cardiff in Onondaga County, Upstate New York

this portion of Upstate New York was known for its share of strange encounters and tales, including joseph smith’s golden plates given to him by the angel moroni

the onondaga people were part of the iroquois confederacy, considered this area their traditional homeland, had a tradition involving a mythological rock giant known as stone coat, twice as tall as normal humans and with skin as hard as stone

21
Q

the find of the cardiff

A

William “stub” newell came across it after digging a well with his workers, found it 3 ft deep

claims the body appeared to be petrified or turned to stone in his eternal slumber

22
Q

who were the ones who visited cardiff considered him an ancient statue or a hoax who were the three who called it out

A

professional scientists, geologists, paleontologists, and artists all visited. J.F. Boyton, geologist from U of Pennsylvania, Othniel C. Marsh, paleontologist at yale, and James Hall and Henry A. Ward

23
Q

who was behind the cardiff giant

A

george hull, a devout atheist

24
Q

why did george hull do the hoax

A

either money or to mock a man he had a heated conversation with. the man was a methodist minister centred on biblical stories concerning an ancient race of giant men

25
Q

what role did biblical accounts of giants play in the public response to cardiff

A

nephilim: mysterious race of people referenced in the hebrew bible, loosely translated a giants in some versions of the work, and subsequent translations of christina old testament

may be a mistranslation because other hebrew texts refer to the nephilim as the offspring of fallen angels and humans

most common reference in genesis 6:4: when nephilim were on earth in those day and also afterward when the sons of God came into the daughters of man, and they bore children to them

other famous biblical references include the defeat of Goliath by young david in the book of samuel, this is also in the quran but under the arabic name jalut

for christian fundamentalists the find of the cardiff giant reaffirmed the authenticity of the naritives in genesis and other portions of old testament

26
Q

gigantism

A

very rare condition that causes abnormal growth in children and adolescents manifested in increased height. caused by high levels of growth harmone usually as a result of a tumor on the pituitary gland

27
Q

acromegaly

A

similar to gigantism but diagnosed in adults aged 30-50, commonly leads to abnormal growth of the hands feet and face, tends to progress slowly and early signs not obvious

28
Q

rules for a successful archaeological hoax

A

give the people what they want to see

dont be too succesfull, let other people get credit too

learn from your mistakes

29
Q

Darwin’s theory

A

Lampponed by the press and considered controversial for its challenge to Genisis in the Bible but broadly embrace by educators and intellectuals, it sparked enthusiastic searches for remains of ancestral species

30
Q

What did Dubois find

A

Java Man, the braincase of a fossil human, discovered in 1891, 700,000 years old

31
Q

what type of specimen is java man

A

homo erectus

32
Q

Charles Dawson, who was he

A

Amateur sceintist, antiquarian and fossil collector during 19th and 20th century

co founder of several museum associations with Great Britian including Hastings and St. Leonards

named fellow at the geological society and soceity of antiquaries of london

33
Q

charles dawson what did he do

A

discovered the first piltdown fossils in 1908, the four more skull pieces in 1911, almost always responsible for the finds related to piltdown

34
Q

what was discovered about Dawson

A

his find was a human skull and ape mandible

35
Q

who exposed the truth behind dawsons discovery

A

David Waterson, then Marcellin Boule, then Gerrit Smith Miller Jr

36
Q

who helped Dawson hunt for fossils

A

Woodward

37
Q

who supported woodward and what was he known for

A

Grafton Elliot Smith, the champion of the big brain, high domed brain case, primitive jaw paradigm for human evolution

38
Q

piltdown skull because the new paradigm because of its:

A

people were looking for a large brain and primitive ape like jaw

39
Q

the Taung Baby

A

skull of a child found in South Africa, supported the primitve skull paradigm

40
Q

who exposed Dawson

A

Kenneth Oakley, dated the bones by fluorine testing, the jaw and teeth were not the same age as the skull and were not even fossils, just bones

41
Q

key questions of Who discovered America

A

when was the Bering land bridge available

when was there an ice free corridor

how old are the oldest sites in serbia

how old are the oldest sites in the new world

what makes an archaeological hypothesis or site controversial or dubious in terms of the first americans

42
Q

the bering land bridge

A

connected eastern Siberia to the North American plate during the much of last Ice Age

new evidence indicates that the land bridge only formed 35,700 years ago

the land bridge was passable between approximately 10-28000 years ago

greatest extended, measured up to 1500 kms and supported numerous megafauna

end of the last ice age, rising sea levels due to glacial melt slowly submerged the connection, forming the bering seat between the arctic and pacific oceans

43
Q

paleoindian finds

A

clovis: 12,700-13,400 years ago, named for distincetive stone and bone toold industry, used to hunt now extinct pleistocene megafaunce, thought these were the first people in america until…

Preclovis 13,400-24,000 years ago. Small but growing body of evidence for earlier populations that predate clovis. Different lithic industry. mainly pacific coast of the americas,others in northern alaska and yukon

44
Q

tracing people by their DNA

A

Molecular Archaeology: involves the metaphorical excavation of information hidden deep within the genes of living people

to connect modern groups of humasn to its initial population source, these archaeologists of our chromosomes sift through the genetic map of living people to determine which groups share unique codes

so many possible clusters and variants, virtual certainty that those living groups who share the same clusters of minor differences must share biological ancestors whom they inherited it

45
Q

the solutrean hypothesis

A

suggests that the earliest humans entered the americas not from beringia but from europe, traveling in skin or wooden boats along pack ice in atlantic ocean

first put forward in the 1970s and gained support by 2010s by archaeologists dennis stanford and bruce bradley

almost exclusively based on similarities in lithic technology between the solutrean and clovis cultures

46
Q

critiques of solutrean hypothesis

A

solutrean 5000 years older than clovis

lack of archeological evidence

technological difficulty of open ocean travel

similarities between solutrean and north american technologies overstated

all genetic evidence, include paleoindian remains from eastern parts of America, do not show any links to solutrean populations

neo-nazis and other racist groups were quick to adopt the hypothesis to assert claims of early european development in americas over that of indigenous americans

47
Q

three basic themes of peopling of the new world

A

evolutionary: first nations evolved from earlier species of hominins in the western hemisphere

religious: how revelations of the pre columbian colonization of the new world by people of the biblical tradition advances understand god’s historical mission among people

historical: how why and when ancient civilized explorers colonized the new world before 1492 and how amazing facts in the archaeological record, particularly artifacts with fantastic inscriptions on them explain pre columbian arrivals

48
Q
A