Archy 329 Midterm 1 review Flashcards
epistemology
branch of philosphy concerned with the nature, scope, and limitations of knowledge (“awareness of facts”)
assumptions of science
there is a real and knowable universe
the universe operates according to laws
the law are immutable (stay constant usually no matter where or when)
the laws can be studied, revealed, and understood
what questions does epistemology adress
- what is knowledge
- how is knowledge acquired
- how do we know what we know, in archy or any other field of science
- how does anyybody know anything to be actual truthful or real
the scientific process
observation
induction
deduction
testing
what is observation
process of receiving knowledge of the natural world using our senses or recording information via scientifc tools or instruments
what is induction
arguing from specific observations to generalities to form probable conclusions
what is deduction
arguing from generalities to specifics to form certain conclusions
what is testing
use of scientific methods to form inferences (hypotheses) about phenomena and deduce and predict more observable facts
what two things are hypotheses
falsifiable and testable
science vs pseudoscience
science hypotheses are testable and falsifiable
science follows rules of logic and rules of evidence
pseudoscience doesnt do either of those things
scientific debate: controversies within science
scientists do not always agree on the quality, relevance and interpretation of evidence used to support an assertion of fact
accumulated of informaiton to arrive at the best or most likely conclusion
aplways open to scrutiny, continued research
hypothesis
theory
hypothesis
an assertion about the world
theory
a hypothesis that has been extensively tested and has yet to be proven false
Ignaz Semmelweis, what did he do
the two hospitals in vienna, fixed childbed fever issue
what were ignaz semmelweis’ hypotheses for the problems and what was the results
overcrowding, no change
position while giving birth, no change
women upset by priest giving last rites, no change
student doctors rough than experienced ones, no change
what was ignaz semmelweis’ final discovery and solution
his friend died from similar symptons to the childbed fever while he was accidentally cut during an autopsy, he discovered that something in the dead bodies was being transmitted to the mothers because doctors werent washing their hands
psuedoscience checklist
does the source cite “experts” who make polit innocuous, but otherwise meaningless statmeents about the artifact in question
does the source cite “experts” but exagerate their credentials (PhD’s from uncredited institutions
does the source cite experts whose credentials are unrelated to the claims being made (einstein was science not geologist)
does the source cite experts whose previous extreme claims/ unethical behavior are not mentioned or cited
does the source make definitive statements about age of artificant without any supporting data
does the source make what appear to be definitve stateents about the culture of the artifact without any supporting data
does the source make arguments about the artifact that that make little or no sense but sound authoritative
does the source make assertions about appearance of an artifact that has very little relationship to what’s there (pareidolia)
does the source preface most claims with phrases like “maybe” “if” or “image” “could be” or perhaps” and then present detailed scenarious about antiquity, all of which require acceptance of the original speculation which is never tested or proven
does the source make demands such as “if i am wrong let the scientists prove it”
pareidolia
tendency to perceive a specific, often meaningful image in a random or ambiguous visual pattern
what do extraordinary claims require
extraordinary evidence