Approaches in Psychology Flashcards
Biological Approach and Assumptions
thinks that behaviour is determined by our physiology and our biology
Assumptions
Believes that genes affect our behaviour
Brain is the main focus of explaining behaviour
Hormones secreted by glands in the body influence reactions to the environment
Genotype
Genetic makeup
Phenotype
Psychological Characteristic that someone displays due to their genotype and their environment
Evaluation of Biological Approach
+ supports nature side of nature/nuture debate
+ leads to application in biopsychology
- does not consider the role of the environment in behaviour
Behaviourism and Assumptions
thinks that behaviour is learned through the environment
Assumptions
behaviour is learned through experience
observable behaviour is measured scientifically
valid to study behaviour of animals
born a blank slate so no genetic influence on behaviour
Classical Conditioning
when a response becomes associated with a neutral stimulus
Operant Conditioning
learning through punishment and reward
Pavlov Dogs
Ivan Pavlov 1890s - early 1900s
he decided to ring a bell whenever the dogs received food. At first, the dogs did not salivate when they heard the bell but after time, the dogs started to salivate when they heard the bell. This happened because the dogs were conditioned to salivate when they heard the bell
skinner box - what is it? what’s it show? Eval?
B F Skinner
He had rats put into cages with a lever that when pushed would give the rat a food pellet. The rat quickly learnt that pushing the lever would lead to a food pellet
shows
positive reinforcement- get reward
negative reinforcement- stop something unpleasant
punishment - unpleasant consequence
eval:
- animals not humans
+ operant conditioing leads to learning by association
+ practical - used for systematic desensitsation
- sees people as passive
Social Learning Theory and Assumptions
type of behaviourism which sees us learning from observable behaviour
Assumptions
behaviour is learned from the environment so no genetic influence on behaviour
behaviour is learned from observing others
Bandura bobo doll experiment
Bandura, Ross and Ross 1961
lab
Aim: examine the effect of continual influence of the model and to examine if the sex of the model influence same-sex and opposite-sex participants to a different degree
Procedure: Participants were children who watched an adult being either violent towards a bobo doll or not being violent towards the bobo doll.
Conclusion: behavioural effect from observing aggressive behaviour
supports slt
Evaluation: - effects are only short-term
+ showed that children do copy aggressive behaviour
diff between cultures
-not explain why boys aggressive
+ more complete explanation than conditioning
Evaluation of Behaviourism
+ supports nurture side of nature/nurture debate
- does not consider the influence of thought and cognitive processes
- spontaneous behaviour is not easily explained
+ scientific methods are used
Evaluation of Social Learning Theory
+ takes thought processes into account
- does not explain all behaviour
+ explains the initiation of some behaviours
- research methods are unscientific
Cognitive Approach and Assumptions
Prefer to use lab experiments to study thought processes because it is highly controlled and are looking for objective evidence
Assumptions
thought processes can be studied scientifically
mind work like a computer
stimulus and response is fine only when the thought processes between the stimulus and response is acknowledged
abnormality is faulty thinking
Invisible Gorilla Experiment
Daniel J Simons and Christopher F Chabris 1999
Aim: to see how much individuals can be unaware of their visual field
Procedure: participants watched a video where people in white t shirts and people in black t shirts passed a basketball. There were two types of video: transparent and opaque. Half of the observers watched a video where a woman in an umbrella walked in and the other half watched a video where a man in a gorilla suit walked in. The participants were asked to record how many times the ball was passed and they were also asked if they saw anything unusual in the video.
Findings: 54% of the participants noticed the unusual event and less people noticed the unusual event in the transparent condition
Conclusions: we can miss what we see in our visual field due to inattention