ap seminar eoc Flashcards
Evitably
Everything the author uses to develop their text goes here
Question #1: Identify claim, main argument, or thesis
D. U. E. E. E:
Da Universe Exists Entirely Evitably
Da
Demonstrate understanding of the argument as a whole
universe
Understand and Analyze Context
Mnemonic: Work In Progress
exists
Each new bit of information introduced in the text goes here
entirely
everything that contributes to the claim
work
well-defined research question/claim that implies engagement with other perspectives
in
implications and limitations of the argument
progress
Pitfalls (gaps) in the argument
Question #2: Explain line of reasoning
Unconforming Women Are Really Radical
Unconforming
Understand and Analyze Context (W.I.P)
women
what contributes to the argument
are
anything that the author uses evidence to support
really
relevant claims and connections
radical
relationships between claims
Question #3: Evaluate the effectiveness of the evidence
S. I. R. E:
Stuck In Reverse Ecstasy
stuck
strengths and weaknesses of the evidence
in
Include all evidence (!!)
reverse
relevance of evidence and credibility of sources
ecstasy
Evaluate sources and evidence
M.C.H: Macbeth Hurts Cordelia
macbeth
multiple sources and why the author uses the evidence from those sources
hurts
how the evidence ties back to the claim
cordelia
credibility tags and how they strengthen the argument
Question #4: Long answer question
W. O. O. S. H. I. W. S. R. T. P. C. D.
Woah, Oh, Oh, Serial Heartbreaker, I Want Sweet Revenge, Think Positive, Calm Down
Woah
Well-defined research question (answered with debatable claim that implies engagement with other perspectives)
oh #1
other relevant issues
oh #2
Opposition
serial
synthesize multiple perspectives into one argument
heartbreakerrr
how it relates to stimulus material
i
implications and limitations of an argument
want
why pick one over the other
sweet
show evidence from multiple sources + why i’m using the evidence (body)
revenge
reference the importance of the overall topic
think
tie it back to the claim
positive
pitfalls in the arguments
calm
credibility tags
down
dinner table!